Re: [c-nsp] QSFP to SFP+ over 300 meters: Can it be done out of box?

On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Troy Lucero wrote: Seems there is no option here. The QSFP-40G/E-LR4 doesn't have an MPO connector like its' SR4 counterpart, so there is no MPO break-away option to choose from if I want to go 10gig over singlemode. Correct, LR4 is 4 10G CWDM waves over a single fiber p

[c-nsp] QSFP to SFP+ over 300 meters: Can it be done out of box?

Anyone care to comment on trying to go from a 40gig port to a 10gig port over 300 meters? I seem to have discovered that the QSFP+ standard for 10 gig is not flexible for long-haul applications. I am deploying a couple Nexus 6004's (mixed 40gig and 10gig) for various distances but can't seem t

Re: [c-nsp] Changing ve id doesn't withdraw old prefixes

Hi, It does look like a bug. How often would you change ve id though? I'd expect that to be fairly static once set up. We had a number of issues of that sort (Cisco expected the number/id to be static during the lifetime of a service, but we changed it). Most of those bugs ultimately got fixed, bu

Re: [c-nsp] BITS interface on ME-3600X

Hi, ME3600x can be used for mobile backhaul. If you do E1/T1 or STM emulation - you have to provide correct clocking to both sides. One end would normally take the clocking of some external source (for example using the BITS port) and the other one would relay on something like 1588v2 (or syncE) t

Re: [c-nsp] NetflowAuditor

John Elliot wrote: > Just wondering if anyone has used this product? (http://netflowauditor.com/) > Any comments/experiences are greatly appreciated. I would not touch them with a stick. They have been spamming one of my addresses for the last couple of years and keep doing so despite several co

Re: [c-nsp] BITS interface on ME-3600X

Hi, On Thursday, June 20, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Martin T wrote: > In which scenario would somebody want to use ME-3600X for > providing this clock signal? In addition, why would one want to receive > E1/T1 timing signal on an Ethernet switch? the switch needs a reference clock source to provide SyncE

[c-nsp] Changing ve id doesn't withdraw old prefixes

I've just set up BGP signalled VPLS w/auto discovery between two 15.3(2)S1 ME3600 boxes and I'm seeing something a little odd. I'll admit I'm very new to the BGP VPLS stuff, but I'm sure this is not right in the head... Topology: +- ASR9K RR 1 + trs01.002

Re: [c-nsp] NetflowAuditor

Thanks Paul - How many flows per second were you doing? I'll certainly be trialling it. Cheers. > Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:42:28 -0400 > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NetflowAuditor > From: p...@paulstewart.org > To: johnellio...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Hey thereŠ. > > We used it q

[c-nsp] BITS interface on ME-3600X

Hi, Cisco ME-3600X switches support RJ45 BITS(Building Integrated Timing Source) interface which can be used for sending and receiving the E1 or T1 timing signals. As I understand, timing signals in case of SDH/SONET are needed in each node to keep the transmit and receive rates unified all over t

Re: [c-nsp] NetflowAuditor

Hey thereŠ. We used it quite some time back and it was "ok". Our issue with it was scaling - once we started to do 1:100 sampling across several routers it had a really difficult time keeping up. The hardware we were using was "beefy" Š. Granted this was quite a while back when we were using GSR

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool (Yann Stacy)

Hi, There's also netbrain. Expensive but nice Regards   YS From: "cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net" To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 4:00 PM Subject: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 127, Issue 39 Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions t

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:17 AM, M K wrote: > What other options we have to draw network diagrams other than visio and > edraw max ? > I use Lucidchart . They have a (limited) free plan, but I pay for the pro account. I like how the diagrams l

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool

On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 20/06/2013 14:47, Jared Mauch wrote: >> I would use omnigraffle if you want something predictably laid out. You >> can also use graphviz if you want something to automatically lay out >> hundreds or thousands of nodes. > > omnigraffle uses

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool

On 20/06/2013 14:47, Jared Mauch wrote: > I would use omnigraffle if you want something predictably laid out. You > can also use graphviz if you want something to automatically lay out > hundreds or thousands of nodes. omnigraffle uses graphviz as its layout engine, and can read .dot files directl

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool

I would use omnigraffle if you want something predictably laid out. You can also use graphviz if you want something to automatically lay out hundreds or thousands of nodes. Jared Mauch > On Jun 20, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Massimiliano Stucchi > wrote: > >> On 6/20/13 2:17 PM, M K wrote: >> What o

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool

For Q&D diagrams, there's also gliffy. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Massimiliano Stucchi < stucchi-li...@glevia.com> wrote: > On 6/20/13 2:17 PM, M K wrote: > > What other options we have to draw network diagrams other than visio and > edraw max ? > > Omnigraffle is a nice option. > > -- > >

Re: [c-nsp] PIM BiDir on Nexus

Colin, thx for the feedback. -- Regards, Ge Moua Univ of Minn Alumnus -- On 06/19/2013 06:36 PM, Colin Whittaker wrote: This was all M108 and M132 cards. We were doing both pim bidir and pim-sm. The fib bugs were rare enough but we had enough scale that even at something like 1 in 1000 error

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool

On 6/20/13 2:17 PM, M K wrote: > What other options we have to draw network diagrams other than visio and > edraw max ? Omnigraffle is a nice option. -- Massimiliano Stucchi ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@pu

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, M K wrote: What other options we have to draw network diagrams other than visio and edraw max ? Depends on how fancy you want the diagrams to look. For Linux (free), there's Dia. For OSX (not free), there's Omnigraffle. --

[c-nsp] Drawing Tool

What other options we have to draw network diagrams other than visio and edraw max ? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Ronan Mullally wrote: I think this relates to the power supplies. I noticed 'Version 1' and 'Version 2' power options in the specs a few weeks ago. When I asked our SE he told me V1 has 3 power modules, V2 has 4. The difference is essentially to provide more headroom in

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: > > > Dear List > > > > What is the difference between the chassie versions? > > > > Is the V2 just a hardware revision? > > V2 is probably the uprated FAN array, which means you can have DWDM > optics

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

On 20.06.2013 9:40 AM, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: > What is the difference between the chassie versions? > > Is the V2 just a hardware revision? I haven't found a real difference, but: -> other power supplies. Cheers, Tim ___ cisco-nsp mailing l

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

One more round with google and it seems that it is the PEM that is upgraded. • Power Entry Module and Power Supply Version 2: The new Power Entry Module Version 2 (PEMv2) and Power Supply Version 2 for the Cisco ASR 9010 and ASR 9006 routers provide investment protection by offering increased powe

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: Dear List What is the difference between the chassie versions? Is the V2 just a hardware revision? V2 is probably the uprated FAN array, which means you can have DWDM optics in all slots in a 24x10GE card. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm.

[c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

Dear List What is the difference between the chassie versions? Is the V2 just a hardware revision? -- *Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* Senior Network Architect Obduro Network AB ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.net