Hi Yaswanth
I haven’t made it in real life, but doesn’t seem difficult.
What I would do is publish the default route with a different community in each
hub (i.e. 65000:1 in one hub and 65000:2). In each spoke, depending of what you
want use the community to set a local preference.
i.e.
in
Hi Yaswanth
I haven’t made it in real life, but doesn’t seem difficult.
What I would do is publish the default route with a different community in each
hub (i.e. 65000:1 in one hub and 65000:2). In each spoke, depending of what you
want use the community to set a local preference.
i.e.
in
They will always have a job for you there with that design.
On 25 July 2013 13:04, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk wrote:
I see so the islands are stitched together over the CsC L3VPN, since all
islands have the same AS together they act like a common AS.
And the CsC L3VPN is provided
On 25/07/13 17:31, Phil Mayers wrote:
AFAIK, IOS doesn't do this, even with vlan dot1q tag native set
globally (which we set for avoidance of half-directional tagged links).
For info, some versions of IOS do this, but it was fixed as a bug - see
for example CSCtc20603
I'm guessing this bug
Hi all,
This may be interesting for everybody using MPLS-TE and Loadbalancing with
ES+ LC.
We use Cisco 7600 with IOS 15.3.1-S2 and the following LCs:
Module Part number Series CEF mode
1RSP720-3C-10GEsupervisor CEF
276-ES+T-4TG
However, in order to turn on 250 MDT routes,
we have to drop the IPv4 routes down to 12,000.
A reasonable use-case for a larger FIB in this platform family :-).
We've gone through the same disappointment so I'm waiting for the
mLDP/NG-MVPN support.
Yes however the bigger FIB would be
Regarding the lack of 10GigE ports + 1GigE ports density, my first question
when I saw this platform was: Is it stackable?
It would be great if the new version of X(CX) is stackable.
Yes so far we use 2x CX to redundantly connect a 10GE ring to the city POP.
However we don't really need
interface TenGigE0/1/0/0.22001 l2transport encapsulation dot1q 100-399
exact rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
What the heck. I have just tried to configure this in the lab and it did not
complain.
When the box removes the tag form the incoming frame how does it know what
tag to apply on the
Hello Darin,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:19:13PM -0500, Darin Herteen wrote:
I have been trying to hunt down some definitive answers regarding
interoperability using non-cisco AP's running CAPWAP in conjunction with a
Cisco WLC 5508 running 7.3.101.0.
A TAC case I opened on this issue
Hi,
I would like to put different types of payloads inside a L2VPN (whether p2p
or vpls) and confirm that the terminating router will not process the
payload (i.e: only pass it to the CE/customer). I am wondering how i can do
that? specially if i want to test legacy protocols (AppleTalk,
10 matches
Mail list logo
