[c-nsp] Small Catalysts, small buffers, drop "preference" ?

2013-09-03 Thread Jeff Kell
We have a fairly extensive access layer of smaller and mostly older Catalysts (2950s, 2960s) with building distribution 3550s/3560s as uplinks. We did some overhauls over the summer to get not only gig uplinks to the buildings, but gig uplinks to each access layer switch within the building. Most

[c-nsp] difference between "multicast" and "multicasts" counters in Catalyst "sh int" output?

2013-09-03 Thread Martin T
Hi, interface Fa0/19 on WS-C3550-24 receives various multicast frames like VTP(dst MAC 01:00:0c:cc:cc:cc), CDP(dst MAC 01:00:0c:cc:cc:cc) and PVST(dst MAC 01:00:0c:cc:cc:cd). Switch counts those frames as "multicast" as it should, but besides that, it counts those as "broadcasts" as well: SW3#sh

Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-09-03 Thread Martin T
Andriy, I forgot to update the list, but I already figured out what you explained :) Once I made the class-maps more specific(for example specified that matching protocol is TFTP), the issues described in previous e-mails were resolved. regards, Martin On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Andriy B

Re: [c-nsp] CoPP and WRR

2013-09-03 Thread Antonio Soares
Thanks for the feedback. It seems it's a bit more difficult than I thought. For example, by default, the 6704-10GE uses a combination of Tail Drop and WRED: Router#sh queueing interface tenGigabitEthernet 2/1 <...> queue tail-drop-thresholds -- 1 70[1] 100[2

Re: [c-nsp] BGP memory usage: "holding"

2013-09-03 Thread Chris Hunt
On 8/30/2013 11:15 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2013-08-30 16:08 -0700), Chris Hunt wrote: > >> ASBR01#show ip bgp summ >> BGP using 118439934 total bytes of memory >> ASBR01#show proc memory sorted >> PID TTY Allocated FreedHoldingGetbufsRetbufs Process >> 245 0 1164760780 272

[c-nsp] How to reset/recover password on SUP 2T

2013-09-03 Thread Sai
I cannot find any documentation on how to reset/recover password on Catalyst 6500E with Supervisor 2T. Any pointers? Thanks, Sai ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://p

Re: [c-nsp] CoPP and WRR

2013-09-03 Thread Phil Mayers
On 03/09/13 13:23, Saku Ytti wrote: On (2013-09-03 13:10 +0100), Antonio Soares wrote: wrr-queue bandwidth percent 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 wrr-queue queue-limit 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 wrr-queue cos-map 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 But doing this kind of stuff for hundreds of interfaces doesn't make too much sense

Re: [c-nsp] CoPP and WRR

2013-09-03 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2013-09-03 13:10 +0100), Antonio Soares wrote: > wrr-queue bandwidth percent 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 > wrr-queue queue-limit 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 > wrr-queue cos-map 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > > But doing this kind of stuff for hundreds of interfaces doesn’t make too > much sense. Alas it is what you mus

[c-nsp] CoPP and WRR

2013-09-03 Thread Antonio Soares
Hello group, Due to the implementation of CoPP on a few 6500s, we had to enable QoS. Now we are suffering of outputs drops on many interfaces, mainly due to fact that the majority of the traffic is COS=0. Is there a way to disable WRR and get the previous behavior (no qos) ? I don’t like the id

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 real world (sampled) netflow

2013-09-03 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2013-09-02 22:54 +), Dobbins, Roland wrote: > No, it isn't - he won't be able to detect anomalies reliably nor will he be > able to characterize floods, because the statistics are non-determinstically > skewed. Perfect is enemy of done. Someone might say Arbor is useless because it can'

Re: [c-nsp] Why L2VPN Pseudowire Redundancy not work?

2013-09-03 Thread PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX
Hi, switch that connect with PE1 is ME-C3750-24TE. And PE1 is 7609-S. Thank you very much. -Original Message- From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 9:25 AM To: PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; p.pansa...@gmail.com

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 real world (sampled) netflow

2013-09-03 Thread Jon Lewis
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Dobbins, Roland wrote: On Sep 3, 2013, at 4:34 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: Having used it exactly for that, I disagree and am curious why you say it's useless. Because in any Internet-facing environment with any kind of traffic diversity, it's non-deterministically skewed. So

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 real world (sampled) netflow

2013-09-03 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Sep 3, 2013, at 4:34 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: > Having used it exactly for that, I disagree and am curious why you say > it's useless. Because in any Internet-facing environment with any kind of traffic diversity, it's non-deterministically skewed. So, in a network environment of any scale, y

Re: [c-nsp] qos plan - advice please

2013-09-03 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 12:58 -0500, Aaron wrote: > Why qos? Does it do any good IF links aren't congested? In other > words, if I don't have congestion, is there a reason for it? ...meaning > that if I can simply add fatter pipes (go from 1 gig to 2 gig > etherchannel, or from 10 gig to 20 gig eth

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 real world (sampled) netflow

2013-09-03 Thread Jon Lewis
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Dobbins, Roland wrote: On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Randy wrote: It would only be used for detecting inbound UDP floods and other high PPS anomalies so there is no need for full flows or even much details, just ip src/dst. It's useless for this or any other application be