isn't most of that a by-product of using trident/trident+?
i know that trident ii fixes some of that -- but i think that comes down to the
(some say unwise) decision of using ots components, no?
q.
--
quinn snyder
snyd...@gmail.com
On 12-Sep-13, at 20:15 , Pete Templin wrote:
> On 9/12/13 11
On 9/12/13 11:30 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
To be fair, one would need to compare software features - so what does
the N3K do? L2 only? L3, with how many routes? IPv6, MPLS?
Gert, you don't want to explore the N3K, you'll have 6500 heartburn all
over again. URPF halves the route table size,
Working with a vendor who is saying that when we "upgrade" from 12.2.25 to
15.1.4 on a couple of 2800 series routers holding about 15 IPSec vpn's and
tunnel interfaces with EIGRP across them we are going to have to rewrite all of
the config due to completely new command syntax on 15.1.4 compared
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 15:28 -0400, Chris Evans wrote:
> Have you guys ever looked at the HP 5900 series??
We're evaluating some 5900AF now. Hardware wise we have nothing to
criticise them for, but we have mostly tested software for now. HP
Comware 7 (the OS) is IMHO quite "special" even compared t
Hi,
On 13 September 2013 03:10, Eric Van Tol wrote:
>
> Thanks for the insight. I've confirmed in the lab that explicit paths allow
> LSP setup across areas.
>
> And just to confirm, if our switches have no routed ports on the core-facing
> side, where MPLS and EFPs are configured, enabling FR
On 12/09/2013 20:28, Chris Evans wrote:
> Have you guys ever looked at the HP 5900 series??
>
> HP's 5900, Arista and Cisco 3K's all use the same broadcom trident+
no. The N3064 series uses either trident or trident+; the N3500 series
uses cisco's own silicon.
Nick
All,
Working on 871 router at a customer site. Unknown ARP flood
coming from customer LAN was crushing router CPU, guessing about 2800
pkt/sec. A service policy applied to control plane just matching ARP does
what expected, but when I tried to limit it to just customer-side ARP b
On 12/09/2013 20:31, Phil Mayers wrote:
> Oh yes... the x670 really is a phenomenally cheap box. It has a few caveats
> - tiny tiny tiny buffers, for one - and it's L3 capabilites (neighbour
> table & route table size) are very small, but at layer2, it's very cost
> effective.
buffer table, mac ad
Have you guys ever looked at the HP 5900 series??
HP's 5900, Arista and Cisco 3K's all use the same broadcom trident+
chipsets. HP 5900 comes in a few models, one which is a 48 port SFP+ with
4xQSFP+ that is 21K list. They also have a 48 port Copper 10gig version
with 4QSFP+ that lists at 21K too.
Well, when I said I thought the switches were equal, I wasn't referring to
the price!
Cisco, always "reassuringly expensive" :-)
Aled
On 12 September 2013 17:57, Mark Mason wrote:
> Yea, the Nexus 6k lineup is quite a bit more expensive than the 3k
> lineup. The pricing and builds for the 3k
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:50:41PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 18:30, Mark Mason wrote:
> > I think the ticket is the N3K-C3064TQ-10GT [Nexus 3064-T, 48 10GBase-T and
> > 4 QSFP+ ports]. Looks like it's still new and isn't quite available to be
> > configured in the system an
o48 SFP ports support 1 and 10 Gigabit Ethernet
That is the killer...GLC-T required out for any copper connectivity.
From: aled.w.mor...@googlemail.com [mailto:aled.w.mor...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Aled Morris
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:30 AM
To: Mark Mason
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.
N3K's can do L3. No MPLS. Not sure about IPv6 or table sizes. They can
do VPC though and have low latency.
The price someone listed above might be the older price. The price I see
on CCW is much more "delicious". :)
Oliver
-
Oliver Garraux
Check out my b
If you are brand-loyal to Cisco you might want to look at the Nexus 3000 or
Nexus 6000 ranges.
Aled
On 12 September 2013 15:56, Mark Mason wrote:
> The Cisco product line seems to be missing an equivalent of the Arista
> 7050 100Mb/1Gb/10GBase-T. Maybe taking the 4500x platform converting the
I don't have hands-on experience with them but I assumed that Cisco 6001T =
Arista 7050T and Cisco 6001P = Arista 7050S
Aled
On 12 September 2013 17:46, Mark Mason wrote:
> Yea, actually just seeing that now! Might have a winner!
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Oliver Garraux [mailto:oli.
How is the Arista 7050 different than the Nexus 3064? Cisco recently
slashed the pricing on several of the 3064 models by quite a bit. I'm not
intimately familiar with Arista pricing, but the 3064's current list price
isn't widely different than what I see for the Arista 7050 on a few sites.
Oli
Yea, the Nexus 6k lineup is quite a bit more expensive than the 3k lineup. The
pricing and builds for the 3k's aren't too bad. Great input guys!
From: aled.w.mor...@googlemail.com [mailto:aled.w.mor...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Aled Morris
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:49 AM
To: Mark
On 09/12/2013 07:30 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
Bought a couple of Extreme X670 recently. *That* is a delicious price
for 48 10GbaseT (or SFP+, depending on model) + 4 QSFP+...
Oh yes... the x670 really is a phenomenally cheap box. It has a few
caveats - tiny tiny tiny buffers, for one - and it'
mike --
the vlan mapping configuration will exist on all ports in the port group --
much like port-based qos bits on a per linecard basis.
int gi 1/1
vlan 1 map 11
vlan 2 map 12
int gi 1/2
vlan 1 map 11
vlan 2 map 12
if you activate vlan mapping on an interface, it inherits all maps
All,
Working on 871 router at a customer site. Unknown ARP flood
coming from customer LAN was crushing router CPU, guessing about 2800
pkt/sec. A service policy applied to control plane just matching ARP does
what expected, but when I tried to limit it to just customer-side AR
On 12/09/2013 18:30, Mark Mason wrote:
> I think the ticket is the N3K-C3064TQ-10GT [Nexus 3064-T, 48 10GBase-T and 4
> QSFP+ ports]. Looks like it's still new and isn't quite available to be
> configured in the system and the price is pretty delicious.
$53,400 GPL, according to teh interwebs.
Yea, actually just seeing that now! Might have a winner!
From: Oliver Garraux [mailto:oli...@g.garraux.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:46 AM
To: Aled Morris
Cc: Mark Mason; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Portfolio Miss
How is the Arista 7050 different than
I think the ticket is the N3K-C3064TQ-10GT [Nexus 3064-T, 48 10GBase-T and 4
QSFP+ ports]. Looks like it's still new and isn't quite available to be
configured in the system and the price is pretty delicious.
From: aled.w.mor...@googlemail.com [mailto:aled.w.mor...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of
The Cisco product line seems to be missing an equivalent of the Arista 7050
100Mb/1Gb/10GBase-T. Maybe taking the 4500x platform converting the 32 SFP
ports to copper, and then expansion slot 4x40Gb ports then drop the price 10k+
we might have a match. Thoughts NSP community?
NOTICE: This electr
> -Original Message-
> From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:36 PM
> To: Eric Van Tol
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS-TE on ME3600
>
> Hi,
>
> We use ME3600x with MPLS TE. I can't comment on the first point (we
On 11/09/2013 14:27, mohamed nagy wrote:
> okay who is working with zabbix for network device ???
I spent a day or two looking at it last year, but gave up. The zabbix
monitoring core (i.e. event dispatch engine, etc) is interesting; the gui
is terrible and the back-end data store layout is bizar
Thank you for the reply Quinn, can I perform unique vlan mappings per
interface as well?
e.g. port 1 ---> map vlan 1 to 11, port 2 ---> map vlan 2 to vlan 12
both ports are on the same port group ASIC.
Mike
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:05 PM, quinn snyder wrote:
> configuration is applie
Hi,
then are all on the same ASIC. As a example output for WS-X6516A-GBIC
and WS-X6724-SFP
Regards,
Armin Kneip
nc#sh int gi 1/1 cap
GigabitEthernet1/1
Model: WS-X6516A-GBIC
Type: 1000BaseSX
Speed: 1000
Duplex:full
Tru
Hi Harry,
show interfaces gi 7/1 capabilities
shows the ASIC.
Regards,
Armin Kneip
On 12.09.2013 12:51, Harry Hambi wrote:
> Hi All,
> Trying to diagnose a problem on a 6509 chasis, port showing input and CRC
> errors on one end of the link. The link is a Tengigabit
> I'me going to try the
Thanks.does anyoane know how I would find the Port?Asics mappings?.
Rgds
Harry
Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb
-Original Message-
From: a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk [mailto:a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk]
Sent: 12 September 2013 11:57
To: Harry Hambi
Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject:
Hi,
> Trying to diagnose a problem on a 6509 chasis, port showing input and CRC
> errors on one end of the link. The link is a Tengigabit
> I'me going to try the follwing:
> Change fibre
clean/check fibre first. ensure its the right type of fibre for the link
length and media converter type
>
Hi All,
Trying to diagnose a problem on a 6509 chasis, port showing input and CRC
errors on one end of the link. The link is a Tengigabit
I'me going to try the follwing:
Change fibre
Change Gbic, if errors are still showing try changing port.
Change to a different port on the switch…..how do I mak
Hi allCan i block the below two from a Cisco router ?UDP Constant IP
Identification Field Fingerprintingntp information disclosure
vulnerabilityThanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
http
Hi.
I'd suggest(it is try and fail method) to use a wider range of IP(just for
testing a /29 range will be OK at the end roll back to desired IP) and use a
laptop in each SW to see communication with each Router from SW to SW.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun..
34 matches
Mail list logo
