Re: [c-nsp] ip tcp adjust-mss

2013-11-03 Thread Methsri Wickramarathna
Thanks Pete!!! We are using ASR 1001 series , can configure but I want to make sure before doing it On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote: > Most platforms can't do this in hardware and have to punt the SYN and/or > SYN/ACK packets. Use caution at scale > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at

Re: [c-nsp] Menu in Cisco

2013-11-03 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Take a look at EMM - Embedded Menu Manager (not to confuse with EEM) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/netmgmt/configuration/guide/nm_emm_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of

[c-nsp] Menu in Cisco

2013-11-03 Thread Ali Sumsam
Hello, I am working on a Cisco 3750X switch and have noticed that the "menu" command isn't available with IOS versions 12.2 as well as 15.2 I am trying to set up a few simple commands as Menu options. Is there any other simple way to do it, with the Menu command not being available? *Ali Sumsam

Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address

2013-11-03 Thread Harold Ritter (hritter)
Hi, There¹s at least two alternatives you can use. You either need to use a route-map under AF ipv4 to change the next-hop explicitly for the ipv4 prefixes or you can run a separate session for v4 ad v6 prefixes respectively. The latter is generally recommended. Regards Harold Le 2013-11-03 08

[c-nsp] DFC bootflash?

2013-11-03 Thread P G
What is DFC bootflash for? #dir dfc#3-bootflash:/ No files in directory on the other card it just reports error when I try to show the DFC bootflash and it's not reporting the size of DFC bootflash When I tried to upgrade the rommon on the WS-X6704-10GE with DFC3BXL, one card reported error b

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-03 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Jeff Kell wrote: Customer support died a decade ago. For the front-end stuff, sure. To be fair, and to give credit where credit is due, I have dealt with some TAC engineers who have been incredibly helpful, professional, and responsive. For the things I generally reach

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-03 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Dobbins, Roland wrote: On Nov 3, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: It would be great if Cisco focus-group tested these 'enhancements' before rolling them out, and knock it off with the Java nonsense. They've been going in this direction for the last 10 years -

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-03 Thread Jeff Kell
On 11/3/2013 7:46 AM, Chuck Church wrote: > It's not just the TAC tool that has been suck-ified. The replacement for > the dynamic configuration tool sucks. Tried it a few days ago, first thing > it asks for is a whole bunch of customer info. I just wanted to verify if > there is a non-EOS OC-3

Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address

2013-11-03 Thread Jared Mauch
This is a bug. Cisco has lots of these and I've seen this many times before. Open a case or email your account team to have it reported and fixed. Jared Mauch > On Nov 3, 2013, at 4:09 AM, M K wrote: > > Hi all I was working on a test LAB on GNS3 , the Lab contains both IPv4 and > IPv6 with

Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address

2013-11-03 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi, > Hi Sander and thanks for the reply > I actually converted the numbers into hexadecimal , and am running dual > stacked network IPv4 and IPv6 > but how am going to block this IP address from appearing in the show ip bgp > output ? Same answer as before: Can you show your config? I don't r

Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address

2013-11-03 Thread M K
Hi Sander and thanks for the replyI actually converted the numbers into hexadecimal , and am running dual stacked network IPv4 and IPv6but how am going to block this IP address from appearing in the show ip bgp output ? Thanks again > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address > From: san...@steffa

Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address

2013-11-03 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi, > Hi all I was working on a test LAB on GNS3 , the Lab contains both IPv4 and > IPv6 with different routing protocolsThe starnge issue is that when I issue > the show ip bgp on one of the routers > I find the IP address 32.1.1.146 as a next-hopdid anyone face this before ? >

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-03 Thread Chuck Church
It's not just the TAC tool that has been suck-ified. The replacement for the dynamic configuration tool sucks. Tried it a few days ago, first thing it asks for is a whole bunch of customer info. I just wanted to verify if there is a non-EOS OC-3 POS that would work with a 6500. Painful. Today

Re: [c-nsp] Configuring Multiple Cisco Devices

2013-11-03 Thread Richard Clayton
Since I didn't read the email properly, it's very good though. On 3 November 2013 11:09, Alan Buxey wrote: > Since when was that free? > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-ns

Re: [c-nsp] Configuring Multiple Cisco Devices

2013-11-03 Thread Alan Buxey
Since when was that free? -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Configuring Multiple Cisco Devices

2013-11-03 Thread Richard Clayton
I use Solarwinds NCM On 31 October 2013 12:02, Ahmet Uncu wrote: > Hello all, > I need to configure about 300 cisco routers/switches same time. Could > you offer me a free software that can do this?IT looks like ciscocmd > can do this, but it has lack of documentation since I am not familiar >

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-03 Thread Guillermo Ruiz
I thought that by clicking each warning it was just a "hidden" way to authorize Obama to spy your network issue LMAO ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-03 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:20:07PM -0600, Alex Presse wrote: > It's the new java update - unsigned code gets user verification windows. > Cisco (and everybody else) will need to update all their java delivered user > interfaces to avoid this annoyance. Why on earth does "enter information f

[c-nsp] Strange IP address

2013-11-03 Thread M K
Hi all I was working on a test LAB on GNS3 , the Lab contains both IPv4 and IPv6 with different routing protocolsThe starnge issue is that when I issue the show ip bgp on one of the routers I find the IP address 32.1.1.146 as a next-hopdid anyone face this before ?

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

2013-11-03 Thread Waris Sagheer (waris)
Hi Adam, Update on the issues reported for LACP, LACP QOS - Planned for July 2014. “multicast ingress to port-channel punted to CPU” - Fixed in 15.3(3)S1 and available on Cisco.com "BFD with ASR9K" - ASR9K BFD over Bundle feature has gone through changes in 4.3.0 or later builds and hence custom