Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson
I was aware that the FPGA pairs were 1,4, 2,3, 5,7 and 6,8 I just reversed the numbers 3 and 4, sorry about that Kind regards, Sibbi On 9.1.2014 19:33, "Jiri Prochazka" wrote: >Hi, > >mapping of ports on WS-X6708-10GE to ASIC's is quite different. It's >very common mistake. > >First ASIC is map

Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment

2014-01-09 Thread John Elliot
> Hi, > > > So, just to clarify - You can purchase refurb/secondhand Cisco kit and then > > purchase a smartnet contract for software access/updates(And also hardware > > replacement)? > > Maybe, but Cisco is going to charge you a lot of money for that. More money than purchasing new? Sm

Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment

2014-01-09 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi, > So, just to clarify - You can purchase refurb/secondhand Cisco kit and then > purchase a smartnet contract for software access/updates(And also hardware > replacement)? Maybe, but Cisco is going to charge you a lot of money for that. > But you cant purchase (legally) refurb/secondhand ki

Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment

2014-01-09 Thread John Elliot
I assume "license" infers purchasing the IOS you require? (So, if you require adv enterprise, you must purchase the license for it) But you can purchase smartnet on secondhand kit, and you have full access to download whatever software you want? (But this would be deemed illegal?) On Thu,

Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment

2014-01-09 Thread Chris Marget
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:55 PM, John Elliot wrote: > > So, just to clarify - You can purchase refurb/secondhand Cisco kit and > then purchase a smartnet contract for software access/updates(And also > hardware replacement)? > > But you cant purchase (legally) refurb/secondhand kit and use it with

Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment

2014-01-09 Thread John Elliot
So, just to clarify - You can purchase refurb/secondhand Cisco kit and then purchase a smartnet contract for software access/updates(And also hardware replacement)? But you cant purchase (legally) refurb/secondhand kit and use it with the software running on it? > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:

Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread Jiri Prochazka
Hi, mapping of ports on WS-X6708-10GE to ASIC's is quite different. It's very common mistake. First ASIC is mapped to ports ((1,4),(5,7)), second ASIC is mapped to ports ((2,3),(6,8)). Capacity of inner pairs is 16Gbit, quadruples are 20Gbit. You can try to switch module to the performanc

Re: [c-nsp] R: LNS: Cisco ASR1002-X vs ASR9001-S

2014-01-09 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 07:26:58 PM Brian Turnbow wrote: > One thing asr1000 does not do that we really missed was > the shared policy instances that you can attach to > multiple subinterfaces. That is the only thing we would > like that is not there, for the rest it is a great box. I have

[c-nsp] R: LNS: Cisco ASR1002-X vs ASR9001-S

2014-01-09 Thread Brian Turnbow
Hi > On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 11:43:49 PM Richard Hartmann > wrote: > > > https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-23170#L2TP seems to confirm > > that. Yay... > > > > Even if current IOS XR supported that, it would be too new a feature > > to put into production; that's a shame, really..

Re: [c-nsp] 802.1x Issue with authentication open command

2014-01-09 Thread Painting, Stuart
Off the top of my head: 1. Some authentication changes need a port down/up to take effect. 2. Certain other changes (e.g. removal of RADIUS accounting on a Cat3750) can cause MAB to stop working. The port will show "MAB running" but nothing happens when the end device sends traffic. Solution i

Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread John Neiberger
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) wrote: > WS-X6716-10T I presume that this module uses Janus ASICs for replication. If so, keep in mind that this chip doesn't have a huge amount of replication capacity. The ingress Janus chip is responsible for replicating tra

[c-nsp] 802.1x Issue with authentication open command

2014-01-09 Thread Mann, Jason
The issue we are running into is that when we initially deployed 802.1x we had the command "authentication open" on all of our switch ports. We ran a CscoWorks job last week Thursday to remove that command from all of our ports. Since that time we have ran into a couple of weird issues where the

Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson
It¹s a given the load coming from other modules would go through the fabric, whether inter module traffic does depends on which ports you are using and how SPAN is handled with distributed-forwarding, must admit I¹ve never given that much thought. On the 6708 there are two ASICS ,one for port 1,3,

Re: [c-nsp] 7609 clustering (like 6509 vss or IOS-VR nV edge)

2014-01-09 Thread Aaron
I mentioned this to my cisco account se and they said no, 7609 vss is unsupported aaron From: Stefano Sasso [mailto:stesa...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:16 AM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7609 clustering (like 6509 vss or IOS-VR nV edge)

Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread Andrew Miehs
If this is for a permanent monitoring solution look at network taps from someone like gigamon or netoptics. Save your SPAN ports for debugging network issues - you can very easily overload line cards and fabric when using SPAN. Andrew On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi,

Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, > Dears , > > We have two 6509 interconnected via port-channel of two 10Ge port > carrying about 3Gb. the module used is WS-X6716-10T and only the > two mentioned port are used on this module for the moment . We are > now adding a monitoring probe that will be connected on this module, > the e

Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis)
Thanks Phil, The last question is about the effect of the SPAN on fabric load , the monitored traffic from other module will cross the fabric on its way to the replication engine of module WS-X6716-10T and contribute on fabric load right ? Br. BEN HAMMADI Kayssar   NOKIA SOLUTION NETWOR

Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread Phil Mayers
On 09/01/14 14:47, Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) wrote: Dears , We have two 6509 interconnected via port-channel of two 10Ge port carrying about 3Gb. the module used is WS-X6716-10T and only the two mentioned port are used on this module for the moment . We are now adding a monitoring pr

[c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module

2014-01-09 Thread Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis)
Dears , We have two 6509 interconnected via port-channel of two 10Ge port carrying about 3Gb. the module used is WS-X6716-10T and only the two mentioned port are used on this module for the moment . We are now adding a monitoring probe that will be connected on this module , the estimated moni