Thank you guys. I was really hoping there is another way because I really did
not want to do Xmodem. I guest Xmodem it is..
> On Jan 20, 2014, at 8:33 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
>
> Also, in the future I suggest using the archive commands, and not manually
> loading code. They have protections ag
Also, in the future I suggest using the archive commands, and not manually
loading code. They have protections against this sort of thing.
-Blake
On Jan 20, 2014 6:05 PM, "Jeremy Bresley" wrote:
> On 1/20/2014 5:58 PM, Renelson Panosky wrote:
>
>> We accidently pushed the wrong IOS in this swit
On 1/20/2014 5:58 PM, Renelson Panosky wrote:
We accidently pushed the wrong IOS in this switch. How can we assign IP
address to it in Rommon mode. from switch:
here is what we see this switch on:
File "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-53.SE1.bin" uncompressed and
installed, entry point: 0x3
We accidently pushed the wrong IOS in this switch. How can we assign IP
address to it in Rommon mode. from switch:
here is what we see this switch on:
File "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-53.SE1.bin" uncompressed and
installed, entry point: 0x3000
executing...
Error: hardware not support
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote:
>
>> There is a warning on boot up that the router might explode and spread its
>> ashes into space (or similar).
>
>
> This is not my experience. The warning seen when booting 15.2M
Hi everyone - Just wanting to confirm a few things with the asr1001.
- Are there 2 versions? - 1 that was released with an RP1 and a second that was
released with an RP2(Not an actual RP2, but close to it?)? Some of the docs
state 512,000 IPv4 and 128,000 IPv6...Or Is this just outdated info, a
Hi
I have configured it on GNS3 0.8.2
c7200-adventerprisek9-mz.152-4.S.image
http://eng-mssk.blogspot.com/2012/10/mpls-l3-vpn-6pe-ospfv3-pe-ce-routing.html
BR,
Mohammad
> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:23:37 -0800
> From: le2...@yahoo.com
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] GNS3 ver
Hi,
We are doing routed SVI connected to a vfi between two ME3600 and a Cat6500
(SUP2T). Like this on one of the ME3600:
l2 vfi VPLS-120 manual
vpn id 120
neighbor 172.16.250.11 encapsulation mpls
neighbor 172.16.250.13 encapsulation mpls
interface Vlan120
ip vrf forwarding VRF-A
ip addre
Hi, all,
Am 20.01.2014 um 12:06 schrieb Rolf Hanßen :
> I found on Ebay:
> CISCO7204VXR + NPE400 + PWR7200-AC + C7200-I/O-2FE - 160 Euro
> PA-A3-OC3SMI ATM Port Adapter (73-2427-04 / PA-A3-OC3SMI) - 40 Euro
If you don’t mind buying equipment that is out of support as far as Cisco
is concerned, yo
Just thought I'd point it out in case there was another issue e.g. with MTU
since both ATM and GE can do jumbo frames, and with encapsulations like
PPPoAoE that might be handy.
Aled
On 20 January 2014 17:31, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes, none of the 6 lines has more than 2 MBit, so 100MB
Hi,
yes, none of the 6 lines has more than 2 MBit, so 100MBit upstream is ok.
kind regards
Rolf
> On 20/01/2014 16:20, Aled Morris wrote:
>> Bear in mind this is dual Fast Ethernet not Gigabit Ethernet, compared
>> to
>> your current GSR.
>
> Traffic levels were ~10Mbit, afair?
>
> Nick
>
>
__
Hello all,
i'm trying to do a lab for L3 VPN with 6VPE on GNS3 ver 0.8.6 using
c7200p-adventeprisek9-mz-124-24.T8.image but it doesn't work.
I would like to know if someone makes it works ? what GNS ver and what cisco
image ver?
thanks
Le Luu
___
On 20/01/2014 16:20, Aled Morris wrote:
> Bear in mind this is dual Fast Ethernet not Gigabit Ethernet, compared to
> your current GSR.
Traffic levels were ~10Mbit, afair?
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.n
On 20 January 2014 16:14, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> My list now contains:
> CISCO7204VXR-CH
> PWR-7200-AC=
> NPE-400 (512 MB Ram)
> C7200-I/O-2FE/E
> PA-A3-OC3SMI
>
Bear in mind this is dual Fast Ethernet not Gigabit Ethernet, compared to
your current GSR.
If you could find a NPE-G1 or G2 that wo
The warning is there in 12.2SR in any case, perhaps they¹ve removed it :/
Kind regards,
Sibbi
On 20.1.2014 16:18, "Mikael Abrahamsson" wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote:
>
>> There is a warning on boot up that the router might explode and spread
>>its
>> ashes into s
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote:
There is a warning on boot up that the router might explode and spread its
ashes into space (or similar).
This is not my experience. The warning seen when booting 15.2M on a
NPE-300 isn't shown when booting it on an NPE-400.
15.2M (late
There is a warning on boot up that the router might explode and spread its
ashes into space (or similar).
Assuming you have enough ram there is no particular reason why the
software wouldn¹t load
Kind regards,
Sibbi
On 20.1.2014 15:52, "Mikael Abrahamsson" wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Gert Doe
Hello,
a version without known security bugs sounds good to me. ;)
(according to http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/selectIOSVersion.x)
My list now contains:
CISCO7204VXR-CH
PWR-7200-AC=
NPE-400 (512 MB Ram)
C7200-I/O-2FE/E
PA-A3-OC3SMI
Anything else I forgot ?
kind regards
Rolf
> On Mon,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Gert Doering wrote:
It is still supported? Oh, thanks for that info. I thought NPE400 was
also EOL already, and end of software support - good to know (and
end-of-life announcements for the NPE-G1 have been sent).
Hm, I dug up the EoL announcement, and indeed it's end-o
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> >It's end of everything, so "current IOS" won't work - but 12.3M will be
> >there, and will do everything you need (and still gets security fixes,
> >if I'm not mistaken). Besides that, it will easily get the job done.
>
>
Hi folks,
Is there a support for bvi or routed interface in bridge-domain or vfi on
me3600.
I'd like to terminate couple of p2p xconnects in a common bridge-domain/vfi
along with a vlan interface with vrf designation and ip address and I can't
get it working.
l2 vfi corporate-inet manual
vpn
HI Rolf,
As other have mentioned a 7200 would be what I would use , but there are also
the nm atm oc3 modules for the 37xx/36xx for dirt cheap if a couple hundred
euros is too much..
On ebay there is a 3725 with an oc3 for 40 GBP sourced from London.
You could even get an old 3640 and relive the
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:06:22PM +0100, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
I found on Ebay:
CISCO7204VXR + NPE400 + PWR7200-AC + C7200-I/O-2FE - 160 Euro
PA-A3-OC3SMI ATM Port Adapter (73-2427-04 / PA-A3-OC3SMI) - 40 Euro
Would that combination be sufficient?
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:06:22PM +0100, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> I found on Ebay:
> CISCO7204VXR + NPE400 + PWR7200-AC + C7200-I/O-2FE - 160 Euro
> PA-A3-OC3SMI ATM Port Adapter (73-2427-04 / PA-A3-OC3SMI) - 40 Euro
>
> Would that combination be sufficient?
It's end of everything, so "curren
Hi Nick,
I found on Ebay:
CISCO7204VXR + NPE400 + PWR7200-AC + C7200-I/O-2FE - 160 Euro
PA-A3-OC3SMI ATM Port Adapter (73-2427-04 / PA-A3-OC3SMI) - 40 Euro
Would that combination be sufficient?
Is there something to take care of (size of RAM, bigger memory card for
new IOS images) related to tha
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:37:03AM +0100, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> One ATM card:
> NAME: "slot 2", DESCR: "4 port ATM OC3 single mode, HwVer#: 1.1, SwVer#: 0.0"
> PID: 800-3873-01 rev K0 dev 994423, VID: V00, SN:
A 7301 with PA-A3-OC3SMI should do that nicely and with enough headroom
in 1RU. (
On 20/01/2014 10:37, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> Can you recommend something that I can use as a small (1 or 2 HU) + cheap
> 1:1 replacement?
Easiest thing would be to get a C7200 + ATM card from ebay. You don't need
a fancy IO card. An NPE200 or NPE300 would be fine. The power draw on a
configurati
Hi,
we have a Stone Age router running here that wastes about 14HU of space
that I need for something else:
12008/GRP
2x 1GBit NICs (upstream)
One ATM card:
NAME: "slot 2", DESCR: "4 port ATM OC3 single mode, HwVer#: 1.1, SwVer#: 0.0"
PID: 800-3873-01 rev K0 dev 994423, VID: V00, SN:
We use only
>> Do test rLFA as well.
>
> Next on the list - already converted to routed interfaces in the lab in
preparation. :-)
Oh and don't forget to enable mpls explicit null labels cause it's required
for rLFA to work properly and as a side effect it's a mitigation for one
tLDP bug.
adam
___
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:47:32AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we upgraded a bunch of ASR9k from 4.1.1 to 4.3.2 and we immediatly saw
> low number of drops on nearly all interfaces.
>
> After some debugging it showed that the culprit is LLDP which works
> flawlessly but shows up as in
Hi,
we upgraded a bunch of ASR9k from 4.1.1 to 4.3.2 and we immediatly saw
low number of drops on nearly all interfaces.
After some debugging it showed that the culprit is LLDP which works
flawlessly but shows up as interface input drops.
Has anyone experienced the same?
Flo
--
Florian Lohof
31 matches
Mail list logo
