[c-nsp] ip rsvp bandwidth different values in show run and config

When an incident has been configurat, the variance was totally different. me360x ver.15.3(3)S2. 3600-testI(config)#int tenGigabitEthernet 0/1 3600-testI(config-if)#*ip rsvp bandwidth 900 900 * 3600-testI(config-if)# 3600-testI(config-if)#do sh run int te0/1 Building configuration...

Re: [c-nsp] Event Manager Script

Thanks all for the kind replies , I will make another test and feed you back BR, Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:05:17 -0800 From: monito...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Event Manager Script To: oboeh...@cisco.com; gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net HiTry with 120 seconds delay. Also use

[c-nsp] Private Vlans

Hi allI have configured private vlans on one switch and all is working as expectedNow , I have connected another switch and placed one of the community Vlan hosts to the second switchMy question is from the second switch the promiscuous port will be the trunk port or there is additional

Re: [c-nsp] Private Vlans

You need to replicate the private vlan to the second switch. Jey S. Network Engineer CCIE #41608 Sent from my iPhone On 12 Mar 2014, at 15:16, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote: Hi allI have configured private vlans on one switch and all is working as expectedNow , I have connected another

Re: [c-nsp] Private Vlans

The private Vlans configuration is replicated , but when I tried to ping between the community clients it was not successfulThe issue for me is where to place the promiscuous port? knowing that it's configured on SW1 in the first manner From: sjeyamur...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014

Re: [c-nsp] Private Vlans

Hi, The private Vlans configuration is replicated , but when I tried to ping between the community clients it was not successful The issue for me is where to place the promiscuous port? Nowhere, in your configuration. The trunk between your switches must not have any pvlan config and must

Re: [c-nsp] ip rsvp bandwidth different values in show run and config

This is a problem with any value greater than 4294966. I don't have any peers to actually check signaling, but it looks like this only impact the show run output (which would impact startup if written and reloaded). === R11.3800.Bottom(config)#int g0/8

[c-nsp] Issue with WLC 2504 and 1242 APs

Hi everyone, I have a small WLC deployment (1 2504 WLC running 7.6.110.0) and 12 APs (8 x 1242 and 4 x 1602). All APs are joining the WLC correctly. The issue that I have is that configuration changes (e.g. activating SSH access on the APs) do not get applied to the 1242 APs. This only affects

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1K software trains

On Mar 8, 2014, at 3:26 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote: Hi, In the world of IOS-XE, is there an equivalent to the old S train for service provider use? In IOS-XE there is no distinction such as S/M/T or GD. What you do have in IOS-XE is Extended-Support releases and Standard-Support

Re: [c-nsp] Issue with WLC 2504 and 1242 APs

Did you try a factory reset of the AP yet? On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Christopher Werny cwe...@ernw.de wrote: Hi everyone, I have a small WLC deployment (1 2504 WLC running 7.6.110.0) and 12 APs (8 x 1242 and 4 x 1602). All APs are joining the WLC correctly. The issue that I have is

Re: [c-nsp] ip rsvp bandwidth different values in show run and config

Thank you very much. On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Pete Lumbis alum...@gmail.com wrote: This is a problem with any value greater than 4294966. I don't have any peers to actually check signaling, but it looks like this only impact the show run output (which would impact startup if

[c-nsp] Traceroute doesn't see ASN

Hi all, Why some device can see the ASN? RP/0/RP0/CPU0:R2-CRS#traceroute Wed Mar 12 14:14:00.237 Protocol [ipv4]: ipv4 Target IP address: www.facebook.com Source address: Numeric display? [no]: Timeout in seconds [3]: Probe count [3]: Minimum Time to Live [1]: