Hi
I have setup where DHCP Server is running on Cisco IOS platform (ISR
router).
I this network I also have bunch of Cisco routers which are DHCP Clients.
My problem is that these routers are visible in DHCP binding database with
very strange MAC:
10.2.2.140 0063.6973.636f.2d30.Dec
On 21/09/14 22:35, Robert Hass wrote:
My problem is that these routers are visible in DHCP binding database with
very strange MAC:
10.2.2.140 0063.6973.636f.2d30.Dec 20 2014 11:44 AM
Automatic
3035.302e.3536.6138.
2e34.6132.622d.4769.
On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 23:35 +0200, Robert Hass wrote:
My problem is that these routers are visible in DHCP binding database with
very strange MAC:
10.2.2.140 0063.6973.636f.2d30.Dec 20 2014 11:44 AM
Automatic
3035.302e.3536.6138.
Thanks Waris (It is for ME3600 + ASR1K)
From: wa...@cisco.com
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com; adam.vitkov...@swan.sk; will.ta...@vocus.com.au;
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] next-hop-self under address-family vpnv4 also?
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 02:27:42 +
BGP PIC Edge
BGP PIC Edge would be recommended but if it is not supported, use different RDs
even for the same VPN. This would allow second best path to be installed for
the same prefix.
Best Regards,
[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]
Waris Sagheer
Technical
Adam,
That’s correct RFC3107 is probably now 13+ years old. However it has provided
the foundation for Unified MPLS resulting in RFC3107 support on access devices.
This architecture also pushed the innovation of BGP PIC, Remote LFA, Prefix
Independent Convergence and now Segment Routing.
Best
Hi Everyone,
Ive configured a simple test to ensure egress shaping is working under a
service instance (As you cannot apply service policy to vlan interface).
policy-map TEST_1MB class class-default shape average 98000 - Actually set
to 98kb for testing
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
...
