Re: [c-nsp] NAC/802.1x and multiple users on one port

Hi, Web authentication seems to be the best choice here. It definitely reduces the client NAC checks you can do. Kind regards, Bernard On 14 September 2015 at 03:15, Raymond Lucas (AP) < raymond.lu...@dimensiondata.com> wrote: > Rob, > > I haven’t used it, but Per Session VLAN Assignment

Re: [c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:45:58PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 14/09/2015 22:39, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > We are running all of this over SMF. > > why are you using LRM transceivers then? I am not exactly sure of the design decisions behind the choice to use LRM over SMF to orginally

Re: [c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 14/09/2015 21:03, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > We're obviously looking at getting new optics, but we're wondering > > why what we have works and if it still isn't possible to get > > the Nexus 5548 and Cat 6880X links to behave

Re: [c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

On 14/09/2015 21:03, Crist J. Clark wrote: > We're obviously looking at getting new optics, but we're wondering > why what we have works and if it still isn't possible to get > the Nexus 5548 and Cat 6880X links to behave better. these symptoms sound like electronic dispersion compensation

Re: [c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

The SFP-10G-LR are designed for SMF. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Mike Hale wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the LRM SFPs are designed to go over MMF, > not SMF. Isn't that going to be a problem? > > We're using some LRM SFPs between floors to a 5548, and

Re: [c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the LRM SFPs are designed to go over MMF, not SMF. Isn't that going to be a problem? We're using some LRM SFPs between floors to a 5548, and they function just fine. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14,

Re: [c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

On 14/09/2015 23:15, Crist J. Clark wrote: > I am not exactly sure of the design decisions behind the choice to use LRM > over > SMF to orginally connect the distro to the core when the campus was built. But > given that it was working, and we already had almost enough spare LRMs on hand > to

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 6880-X and GLC-T

Robert, For what it's worth we have some GLC-Ts in a 6807-XL (not a 6880X) but we are able to set the speed to 10/100/1000 and duplex to full/half. Hope that helps. Mitch Dyer -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Hass Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

LRM works on SM. I have used them a lot on cat 4500s but we mainly but not only used them for OM1 cable. Cisco link below: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/transceiver-modules/data_sheet_c78-455693.html Cisco SFP-10G-LRM Module The Cisco 10GBASE-LRM Module

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 6880-X and GLC-T

I think no. I have only found that SFP to do 1Gbps on any platform. On Sep 13, 2015, at 1:27 PM, Robert Hass > wrote: EXTERNAL Hi I have question are speeds 10M and 100M supported on GLC-T SFP (RJ45 10/100/1000) on Catalyst 6880 ? Rob

Re: [c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

On 14/09/2015 22:39, Crist J. Clark wrote: > We are running all of this over SMF. why are you using LRM transceivers then? Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] SFP-10G-LRM in Nexus 5000

On our campus, we have a pair of Nexus 5596 cores connected to 5548s at the distro layer using SFP-10G-LRM optics. We ran into some of the layer 3 limitations inherent in the 5596s and are moving to a Catalyst 6880X core. To be safe, we just copied the existing design and put in SFP-10G-LRM optics