Re: [c-nsp] MPLS EXP QOS

2016-01-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On 20/Jan/16 19:32, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > > Now the other issue I am facing is one of the PEs is 7606-S and the other one > is ME3600X , my termination with my neighbor is interface Vlan (SVI) , when I > tried to apply the configuration on the ME3600X box > interface Vlan x >

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

2016-01-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On 21/Jan/16 01:17, Peter Kranz wrote: > > 1 100G port facing an upstream > 1 100G port facing the other chassis > 10 10G or 4 40G ports facing the downstream customer > Full routes The Cisco NCS5000 is an option, but I don't think it supports full tables. What seems most viable to me is the

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Modular Encoding Platform D9036 Software Default Credentials Vulnerability

2016-01-20 Thread Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Cisco Modular Encoding Platform D9036 Software Default Credentials Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160120-d9036 Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2016 January 20 16:00 UTC (GMT

[c-nsp] A9K-RSP440 SFP+ ports

2016-01-20 Thread David Wilkinson
Hi, Can the 2x 10 SFP+ ports on the A9K-RSP440 be used like a normal 10G port you would have on a line card? The datasheet says that they are "Two 10-GE Small Form-Factor Pluggable Plus (SFP+) virtualization cluster ports". I assume the virtualization cluster port is to do with VSS/nV,

[c-nsp] MPLS EXP QOS

2016-01-20 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi all I have two eBGP peerings that am running VPNv4 sessions on (Inter-AS option-C) What am trying to achieve is to make sure that packets going out from my CE is matched and placed on the ASBR in the appropriate hardware queue What I have is 4-class QoS model (Gold , silver , platinum and

Re: [c-nsp] A9K-RSP440 SFP+ ports

2016-01-20 Thread Tom Hill
On 20/01/16 17:07, David Wilkinson wrote: > So I am guessing they are normal ports which can be configured to be > cluster ports and could used normally to link up to rest of the network? They are not, as far as I'm aware. Very much the opposite to 6500/7600 supervisors. Certainly there are no

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Unified Computing System Manager and Cisco Firepower 9000 Remote Command Execution Vulnerability

2016-01-20 Thread Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Unified Computing System Manager and Cisco Firepower 9000 Remote Command Execution Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160120-ucsm Revision: 1.0 For Public Release 2016 January 20 16:00 UTC (GMT

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

2016-01-20 Thread Peter Kranz
Happy to clarify James, to expand: " Anyone have any thoughts the most cost effective chassis available currently that supports 100G ports? Need to route upwards of 200 Gbps and handle full tables, but cost is definitely a factor." I would be using 2x100G ports to upstream providers pulling full

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

2016-01-20 Thread James Bensley
I guess it depends where in your network this is going but have you seen the new ASR907's - I haven't seen any prices yet so can't comment. Reach out to your Cisco bod. James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

2016-01-20 Thread Tom Hill
On 20/01/16 22:17, Peter Kranz wrote: > Anyone have any thoughts the most cost effective chassis available currently > that supports 100G ports? Need to route upwards of 200 Gbps and handle full > tables, but cost is definitely a factor. I suspect you can pick two out of the three in most cases:

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

2016-01-20 Thread James Bensley
Sorry I missed the full table requirement. Can you give some more info on what you want, I mentioned ASR907's because I'd like to see someone deploy the 100G cards :) But various cisco do you for 200Gbps. Do you want the smallest box that can do that, or have you got space/power/cooling/budget

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

2016-01-20 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:34 PM, James Bensley wrote: > > Sorry I missed the full table requirement. I’ve used 9904 for this before. - Jared ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

2016-01-20 Thread Peter Kranz
Anyone have any thoughts the most cost effective chassis available currently that supports 100G ports? Need to route upwards of 200 Gbps and handle full tables, but cost is definitely a factor. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com pkr...@unwiredltd.com