[c-nsp] Cisco ASR 9k and Windows RADIUS server

2016-05-03 Thread David Wilkinson
Hi, We have a RADIUS server running on Windows Server 2008. It currently handles the logins for our network devices, a mixture of Cisco IOS, NX-OS and Dell F10 blade switches and this has been working fine. When I went to setup our new ASR 9006 routers to the RADIUS server it was failing to

Re: [c-nsp] Hierarchical FIB on Cisco 7600

2016-05-03 Thread James Bensley
On 23 April 2016 at 20:38, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: >> Reviving this old thread, is anyone running a hierarchical FIB on a 7600, >> how is >> it working for you? Has it halved your PPS rate for >> VPNv4/VPNv6 traffic due to recirculation? >> > Sorry can't comment on this

Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-03 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:30:20AM +0200, Marco Marzetti wrote: > > I have a feature request to at least add a knob for "please use GUA > > next-hop!" - CSCut26765 - it was opened by a friendly Cisco developer, > > and I have no read access to it, so no idea whether it's proceeding or > >

Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-03 Thread Marco Marzetti
On 2016-05-03 08:47, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:39:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ganschow wrote: There's a feature request open for this. The whole "use link-local next-hops for peers where the session is via a global address" is one of the most stupid ideas in this whole

Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-03 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:39:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ganschow wrote: > There's a feature request open for this. The whole "use link-local next-hops for peers where the session is via a global address" is one of the most stupid ideas in this whole IPv6 thing anyway. There is no benefit, but a