Thanks Juergen - Did you notice any significant increase in ram utilisation
once you enabled the 2 full tables? (i.e. ours is currently sitting at ~83%,
base conf)or did memory usage not change that much (i.e. it was
"reallocated" from other processes)
Cheers
__
Wow...thanks - okthought this was referring to the "other" memory leak bug,
but this looks to be a new one, no IOS fix yetworkaround is
"interesting"
Workaround:
Issue 'no shut' on all the interface in the system, consumed memory is released.
From
> Thanks Juergen
> - Did you notice any significant increase in ram utilisation once you
enabled the 2 full tables?
> (i.e. ours is currently sitting at ~83%, base conf)or did memory usage
not change that much
> (i.e. it was "reallocated" from other processes)
One Pair of them:
46.9% (1.62
I see the main difference between the two is the 32 bit OS vs a 64 bit and
1.5 single core vs a 2.2 dual core. Yes the memory is increased and hard
drive space.
If a 1006 will be used for some DS1 and Ethernet termination would an RP1
be enough? I could also do with an ESP20 and SIP10s since t
Thanks.
My reply is inline.
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 23:04:29 +
> From: Lukas Tribus
> To: Mike - st257 , "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS: Polling OSPF External LSA count via
> SNMP
> Message-ID:
> <
> am3pr08mb01023b5907ccb2cd9fc73feaed...
Sent from a mobile device
>
> Now that my typo is out of the way, I receive a zero value for the proper
> OID.
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.14.1.6 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.14.1.6.0 = Gauge32: 0
>
> I'm able to successfully poll another router and get the proper value
> r
--- Begin Message ---
NX-OS appears to do this:
actual acl:
show access-list v1873
IP access list v1873
10 permit ip 10.28.0.0/16 10.28.72.0/24
20 permit ip 10.28.0.0/16 10.28.74.0/24
30 permit ip 10.28.73.0/24 10.28.73.0/24
40 permit ip 10.28.73.0/24 10.28.75.0/24
50 permit ip 10.28.73.0/24 10.2
Andrew,
See the output below.
Thanks.
- Mike
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
>
>
> Sent from a mobile device
> >
> > Now that my typo is out of the way, I receive a zero value for the proper
> > OID.
> > .1.3.6.1.2.1.14.1.6 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID
> >
Ive got some ASR1006's with RP1/SIP10purchased years ago, and they do the
job, but If buying one now, Id def go RP2...writing conf, sh commands(Both can
be horribly slow vs RP2), flexibility to add more ram, bigger/newer SIPs/ESPs
etcmore $, but worth it imo.
__