Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 RP1 vs RP2

Ive got some ASR1006's with RP1/SIP10purchased years ago, and they do the job, but If buying one now, Id def go RP2...writing conf, sh commands(Both can be horribly slow vs RP2), flexibility to add more ram, bigger/newer SIPs/ESPs etcmore $, but worth it imo.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS: Polling OSPF External LSA count via SNMP

Andrew, See the output below. Thanks. - Mike On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Andrew Miehs wrote: > > > Sent from a mobile device > > > > Now that my typo is out of the way, I receive a zero value for the proper > > OID. > > .1.3.6.1.2.1.14.1.6 = No Such Instance currently

Re: [c-nsp] use of discontiguos-netmasks to optimize TCAM resource usage as applicable to acls

--- Begin Message --- NX-OS appears to do this: actual acl: show access-list v1873 IP access list v1873 10 permit ip 10.28.0.0/16 10.28.72.0/24 20 permit ip 10.28.0.0/16 10.28.74.0/24 30 permit ip 10.28.73.0/24 10.28.73.0/24 40 permit ip 10.28.73.0/24 10.28.75.0/24 50 permit ip 10.28.73.0/24

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS: Polling OSPF External LSA count via SNMP

Sent from a mobile device > > Now that my typo is out of the way, I receive a zero value for the proper > OID. > .1.3.6.1.2.1.14.1.6 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID > .1.3.6.1.2.1.14.1.6.0 = Gauge32: 0 > > I'm able to successfully poll another router and get the proper value >

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS: Polling OSPF External LSA count via SNMP

Thanks. My reply is inline. Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 23:04:29 + > From: Lukas Tribus > To: Mike - st257 , "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS: Polling OSPF External LSA count via >

[c-nsp] ASR1000 RP1 vs RP2

I see the main difference between the two is the 32 bit OS vs a 64 bit and 1.5 single core vs a 2.2 dual core. Yes the memory is increased and hard drive space. If a 1006 will be used for some DS1 and Ethernet termination would an RP1 be enough? I could also do with an ESP20 and SIP10s since

Re: [c-nsp] ISR4431 memory usage

> Thanks Juergen > - Did you notice any significant increase in ram utilisation once you enabled the 2 full tables?   > (i.e. ours is currently sitting at ~83%, base conf)or did memory usage not change that much > (i.e. it was "reallocated" from other processes) One Pair of them: 46.9% (1.62

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - Any "outstanding" TAC cases people are working through?

Wow...thanks - okthought this was referring to the "other" memory leak bug, but this looks to be a new one, no IOS fix yetworkaround is "interesting" Workaround: Issue 'no shut' on all the interface in the system, consumed memory is released.

Re: [c-nsp] ISR4431 memory usage

Thanks Juergen - Did you notice any significant increase in ram utilisation once you enabled the 2 full tables? (i.e. ours is currently sitting at ~83%, base conf)or did memory usage not change that much (i.e. it was "reallocated" from other processes) Cheers