Re: [c-nsp] hardware accelerated ipv6ip tunnels?

Hi again, to answer my own question: > Hi > Could anyone let me know if this tunnel mode is done by PFC/DFC on > sup720-3B/3C systems? After some testing it seems we're accelerated in this mode: Tunnel1 Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out Processor

[c-nsp] hardware accelerated ipv6ip tunnels?

Hi Could anyone let me know if this tunnel mode is done by PFC/DFC on sup720-3B/3C systems? Thank you in advance, Harald Kapper. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://p

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 and Rosen multicast VPN?

On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > On the migration, Juniper proposed an architecture to cleanly > transition a network from Rosen to NG-MVPN. The talk was given by > Emil Gagala at PLNOG in Warsaw in 2010. You can find the link here: > >    > http://data.proidea.org.pl/plnog/

Re: [c-nsp] ACE30 Config

In bridge mode the ACE does not participate in spanning-tree, it forwards BPDUs merging the two vlans.(101 & 102) So a spanning-tree recalc will occur for vlan the merged vlan, ~50 seconds. So the cmds are safe but there will be a brief outage, is that what you meant? Setting the default route on

Re: [c-nsp] Optic Shutdown TX State?

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Nick Hilliard wrote: you're very brave with your iphones. Shining a laser on a CMOS sensor doesn't seem like a smart thing to do. Smarter than looking into laser with remaining good eye. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] ACE30 Config

Hi, On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote: > Quick question... I'm about to install my first ACE30 into a 6500 > (SUP720)... "don't" It's a dead product, and Cisco has a long track record of breaking special-purpose modules (ACE, FWSM, WISM) in the 6500 on software upgrad

Re: [c-nsp] ACE30 Config

Thanks Mike. There's no existing svclc's on the 6500, so vlan-group 10 is unused. I was mainly concerned that the 6500 would stop switching VLAN101 after it's been assigned to the svclc. Just wanted to get confirmation on that before I drop all my traffic accidentally :-) On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 a

Re: [c-nsp] ACE30 Config

Config looks good for the 6500 portion of the config as long as the vlans you have specified for vlan-group 10 are unused? I also assume you have created the vlans as well? Mike On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Chris Knipe wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Quick question... I'm about to install my first AC

[c-nsp] ACE30 Config

Hi Guys, Quick question... I'm about to install my first ACE30 into a 6500 (SUP720)... Just a quick question about the svclc if I may... I already have VLAN101 with all my rservers (currently in production, being fed from a old LB we'll be replacing with the ACE30). I created a new VLAN102 whic

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco working as PPPoE Server

> I recommended the ASR9001 because it has 10G ports built in. The only thing with the 9k series is that it doesn't support LNS configurations, you can only do LAC or direct termination with it. LNS functionality aside, the 9k is a good choice as a BNG I guess. Regards, Lukas

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco working as PPPoE Server

On 15 August 2016 at 20:26, Sam Silvester wrote: > Hi James, > > What makes you say that? I've had good success over the years with the > ASR1k series for PPP (L2TP and PPPoE) termination so interested in any > perceived advantages for the ASR9k in this role. >From my personal perspective we had