I know Nexus 5ks do not support straight up provider backbone bridging but
is there any way to emulate such a thing?
Scenario is thus:
Two N5596 uplink to two ASR9000 "Core routers". Any VLAN in this VDC is
considered infrastructure. A couple of hosts connect to the N5596 which
are VPC'd into 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance SNMP Remote Code
Execution Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160817-asa-snmp
Revision: 1.0
For Public Release: 2016 August 17 18:45 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller
Enterprise Module Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160817-apic
Revision 1.0
Published: 2016 August 17 16:00 GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Cisco Firepower Management Center Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160817-firepower
Revision 1.0:
For Public Release: 2016 August 17 16:00 GMT
Summary
===
A vulnerability in the web-based GUI of Cisco Firepower
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Cisco Firepower Management Center Remote Command Execution Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160817-fmc
Revision 1.0
For Public Release: 2016 August 17 16:00 GMT
Summary
--- Begin Message ---
What is the diference between LNS and BNG?
Tks
--
Welisson Tomé
br.linkedin.com/in/welissontome/
--- End Message ---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
ar
On 16/08/16 13:33, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
Quick question... I'm about to install my first ACE30 into a 6500
(SUP720)...
"don't"
We've just pulled ours *out*. I can't imagine why anyone would be
deploying them now...
Maybe ther
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/services-modules/eol_C51-728979.html
Extract from that same page:
Customers are encouraged to migrate to the Citrix NetScaler 1000V
(offered by Cisco) or alternative vendor offerings. Information about
this product can be found
at
Hi,
> Op 16 aug. 2016, om 14:33 heeft Gert Doering het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
>> Quick question... I'm about to install my first ACE30 into a 6500
>> (SUP720)...
>
> "don't"
>
> It's a dead product, and Cisco has a long
> Just found out the hard way indeed. I can create an EVC on
> the 3400g, I can put an interface into the EVC but cannot
> associate any bridge domain with it.
Forget EVC on the 3400 series. Its not real EVC functionality, but some subset
of it for OAM/CFM/E-LMI use.
> I’m guessing I need a ME3
Hi,
Is it somehow possible to include interface info in BGP-syslog Msg ?
As it is done e.g. with PIM. Interface-Info is required by our NMS for
correct filtering
*%PIM-5-NBRCHG: VRF test1: neighbor 1.1.1.1 DOWN on interface
GigabitEthernet4/2.15 DR *
*BGP: 1.1.1.1 resetting - interface Gigabit
Hi Rutger,
> I have a Q-in-Q tunnel with a few different S-VLANs that I want
> to terminate into a bridge-domain, effectively doing EVPN/VPLS
> in a single ME box and hiding all customer specific VLAN
> information while still bridging. I would like to do
> something like:
>
> interface gi3/1
>
Hi all,
I’m struggling with the ME3400G and my google-fu is failing me.
I have a Q-in-Q tunnel with a few different S-VLANs that I want to terminate
into a bridge-domain, effectively doing EVPN/VPLS in a single ME box and hiding
all customer specific VLAN information while still bridging. I wou
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Harald Kapper wrote:
Hi again,
to answer my own question:
Hi
Could anyone let me know if this tunnel mode is done by PFC/DFC on
sup720-3B/3C systems?
After some testing it seems we're accelerated in this mode:
Tunnel1
Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts
14 matches
Mail list logo