Thank you, everyone!
On 9/27/17 12:52 PM, Jim Glassford wrote:
On 9/27/2017 1:47 PM, Chris Russell wrote:
On 27/09/2017 16:44, Bryan Holloway wrote:
In case anyone's interested, this problem mysteriously stopped
occurring about two days after I first reported it to the list.
Curiously enou
On 9/27/2017 1:47 PM, Chris Russell wrote:
On 27/09/2017 16:44, Bryan Holloway wrote:
In case anyone's interested, this problem mysteriously stopped
occurring about two days after I first reported it to the list.
Curiously enough, it started happening again on Monday, September
25th, and agai
On 27/09/2017 16:44, Bryan Holloway wrote:
In case anyone's interested, this problem mysteriously stopped
occurring about two days after I first reported it to the list.
Curiously enough, it started happening again on Monday, September
25th, and again it has gone silent.
This is a bug - can't
To answer my own question, I tested this by trying a /22 within the supernet
statically routed to a next hop on the routercommunity tags applied
correctly, prefix advertised to RR's, so then I tried routing the /22 to Null0
(Expecting it not to work - but it did? Community tags applied/RR a
Hi,
Thanks for the reply - route-map show its getting a hit for the supernet (And
redist statements are not new unfortunately) - The route is in bgp table, and
being advertised to upstreams.just not to our RRsI did some further
checking post identifying the "no community tag" issue -
In case anyone's interested, this problem mysteriously stopped occurring
about two days after I first reported it to the list.
Curiously enough, it started happening again on Monday, September 25th,
and again it has gone silent.
Two separate individuals reached out to me off-list -- first in
HI Divo,
We use asr1ks with rp2s for this type of service without any issues .
One thing you can't do is aggregate shaping on 2 service vlans so you
can't have one shaper for 2 sub ints when using pppoe
So
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/0.1
encapsulation dot1q 100 second-dot1q any
and
interf
Drew Weaver wrote:
> I've always loved the idea of a central configuration point for
> everything but obviously there used to be drawbacks to that
> convienience.
These days, the general wisdom is that the central configuration point
should be a database and that the network should be slaved to th
Hello,
I need to buy a new BRAS/BNG to terminate about 10K PPPoEoQinQ dual-stacked
users.
I've found a platform that looks fine, ASR1002-X with SPA-1X10GE-L-V2
cards, but I wonder if it is able to handle my traffic shaping needs.
I'll use 802.1q double tagged ambiguous interfaces:
interfac
Is the model of distribution switch -> tor switch and trunking vlans all over
the place still the best way to accomplish this or has the 'remote linecard'
thing matured to the point where it is no longer fraught with compromise?
I've always loved the idea of a central configuration point for eve
10 matches
Mail list logo
