Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MPLS interoperability with Mikrotik (or Linux) MPLS

2009-04-30 Thread Allan Eising
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:35:40 -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote: Have anynone done any testing interoperating Cisco MPLS (Cat 6k or 7600 families) with Mikrotik (which is just packaging of MPLS Linux) ? I'm specially curious about EoMPLS and H-VPLS interoperating, but basic LDP/RSVP/MPLS-TE/MPLS-FRR

Re: [c-nsp] Initiating Connections to VPN Clients

2009-02-03 Thread Allan Eising
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Aaron Riemer arie...@wesenergy.com.au wrote: Hi guys, I am trying to work out why I cannot initiate connections to our VPN clients. ICMP seems to be okay and I can see that there is nothing in the log indicating the connections are denied. What could I be

Re: [c-nsp] Not Allowing Vlan 1 on trunk ports

2009-01-18 Thread Allan Eising
You could always use: switchport trunk allowed vlan 2-4094, or specify exactly the vlans you want passing over the trunk, eg. interface GigabitEthernet0/14 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk switchport trunk allowed vlan 2,10,200-300 ! Allan On Sun, Jan 18, 2009

Re: [c-nsp] Restricting VLANs on 802.1q Tunnel Port

2008-10-30 Thread Allan Eising
You cannot control what vlans are allowed on a QinQ interface as the dot1q-tunnel port does not see those vlans. It only pushes a vlan tag on the outside of the ethernet frame, with no regard to the already existing vlan tags. It can be considered an access port that does not override the existing

Re: [c-nsp] %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF

2008-10-16 Thread Allan Eising
I've seen this trap a few times, and it can mean a lot of things depending on the service being provided over the vlan. In my experience, it can happen in large layer-2 service provider networks, where a vlan will carry a customer point-to-point link, and two links are bundled outside of your

Re: [c-nsp] Transparent LAN over Layer3

2008-10-01 Thread Allan Eising
We're having some of the same thoughts in my company, and are a bit concerned over overhead on L2TPv3 and the following MTU limitations. How do you people deal with this? -Allan On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Paul Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks guys... I hadn't head much about l2tpv3

Re: [c-nsp] Allow VTY access by telnet and ssh

2008-09-05 Thread Allan Eising
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 permit 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 deny any log ! line vty 0 4 transport input telnet ssh access-class vty in ! That should do it. Best regards, Allan Eising On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Jay Hennigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ang Kah Yik wrote: I think more specifically, he

Re: [c-nsp] 2950 L2 ?

2008-07-30 Thread Allan Eising
://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Allan Eising ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/