Bug CSCvm57265 has happened to me. The ASR920 in question had its
OSPF/MPLS Router-ID on Lo0 (only loopback configured) and the TCL script
changed it into the MGMT VRF (from the GRT) when inserting a 10G optic
for the first time after enabling the license. Needless to say it took
the site dow
I have this same issue with this same behavior. A reboot was also
required to get it to detect. The kicker is we have one of these cards
in the chassis working already. TAC told me to RMA the SPA.
We are sending a second SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 that was tested in an ASR1002
(not an X, all we had to t
I would also be interested.
On 10/30/2015 1:51 PM, Santiago Martinez wrote:
+1 for the webinar.
Cheers
santi
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Oct 2015, at 03:12, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Yes - I would be interested also - Thanks Waris.
From: cisco-nsp on be
EoMPLS is supported, it will give you a layer 2 tunnel if MPLS is
enabled in the core.
On 5/12/2014 6:00 PM, Pete Lumbis wrote:
I can't find info that says they are supported, but I'd assume not.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Ivan wrote:
Thanks Pete. Do you know if any of the other tunn
default route on both of those originating PEs?
kind regards
Pshem
On 6 December 2013 07:09, Andrew K. wrote:
I have a VRF configuration with MP-BGP/MPLS.
In vrf A there are two default gateways being advertised to the
route-reflectors.
Half of the PE devices in VRF A need to send traffic out one
I have a VRF configuration with MP-BGP/MPLS.
In vrf A there are two default gateways being advertised to the
route-reflectors.
Half of the PE devices in VRF A need to send traffic out one gateway and
the other half out the other, but the route-reflectors are only sending
one best route to th
Anyone know if this feature is supported on the ASR901? I believe it is
on the 903, but I am not finding anything to say it is or isn't on the 901.
If not are there any plans?
Thanks in advance.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
h
Will all these sessions be available on CiscoLive! 365 for those who
could not make it to the event? I found the ASR-903 event but no joy on
the other three.
On 6/16/2013 10:50 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:
Hi,
ASR903, ME800X, ME3600X, ME3600X-24CX, ME2600X& ME3400E Product team will b
I believe the 'connect' command should do the trick.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sb/feature/guide/28sblcl.html#wp1099309
Works well using the EVCs configurations.
On 4/19/2013 10:12 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 19/04/2013 13:51, Sander Steffann wrote:
Any reason why you're not usin
I am able to confirm I see the same thing on my ME3600x running the same
code 15.3(1)S.
On 12/19/2012 3:29 PM, Aaron wrote:
Any idea why I see an interface g0/25 on my me3600x? this may be following
the ios upgrade to 15.3(1)S
There are only 24 physical sfp interfaces on this box
Aaron
A downfall for using the SVI on the ME3600 is you can not apply an
inbound/outbound policy map to the SVI.
We are applying them on the layer 2 trunk interface, gets annoying when
you can to aggregate the rate-limit between multiple interfaces.
(as for version me360x-universalk9-mz.152-2.S1.bi
Are you running the advanced services license?
me360x-universalk9-mz.152-2.S1.bin
switch#sh license
Index 1 Feature: AdvancedMetroIPAccess
Period left: Life time
switch(config)#connect ?
WORD Name for this connection
On 9/27/2012 6:38 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/09/2012 03:38,
Connect does exist but you can't use it with a bridge domain.
The connect command is only used for two service instances. If you need
to link three or more that traffic must be switched, so then just use a
bridge-group.
Connect example
Switch (config)# interface gigabitethernet0/2
Switch (c
Would be great if multicast worked corrected through the efp.
On 8/9/2012 10:19 AM, Aaron wrote:
Thanks Reuben. By efp's, I take it you mean the command structure for
Ethernet service instance, bride domain, etc. right ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Reuben Farrelly [mailto:reuben-c
The AP is in Lightweight Access Point mode, it needs a controller in
order to be configured.
You need to change it into Autonomous mode in order to configure it via CLI.
In order to do this the AP software needs to be changed.
I can't find the cisco.com doc describing this process, but this ca
The ME3400, 3600 and 3800 do not support pushing tags onto frames yet.
This feature will be available in future releases.
ME3600(config-if-srv)#rewrite ingress tag ?
pop Pop the tag
7606-ES20(config-if-srv)#rewrite ingress tag ?
popPop the tag
push Rewrite Operation of pu
I'm attempting to configure WRED with LLQ on a 7606 runing dual sup720
and advanced IP Version 12.2(33)SRE2.
I have the following configuration applied to my 7600-SIP-600
SPA-2XOC48POS interface.
7600#
!
class-map match-any IMPORTANT-TRAFFIC
match mpls experimental topmost 6
!
policy-map OC48
I know on the ME3600 SPAN is not working, I asked cisco about it and
they said its in the road map to get it enabled, I imagine its the same
for the ME3800.
I've been told SPAN/RSPAN is in the works for 15.2(5)S, not committed
for 4th quater of 2012 (along with EVC Push/Translate, this can't c
I've attempted this before and failed, this was with a 7606 running SRE5.
The bootvar is the spare sup720 I was adding was set to boot from the
bootflash, and not the CF disk.
When I inserted the card it loaded the bootflash IOS (which was from a
totally different train).
After this the box
Hello list,
I am having trouble thinking up a migration plan to move all our
internal routes from the general routing table (GRT) to a VRF.
A little background; we are a medium size ISP located in northern
canada. Traditionally we have used iBGP as our IGP and we are looking
to move our cor
Not sure if you looking for the smallest or largest device to accomplish
this but here are two options.
We run a 7204VXR (NPE-G1);currently terminates 300 tunnels with 2500
sessions @ 400 megs of aggregate traffic. CPU load is current 65%, max 75%.
On the other side of the spectrum we run an
I've been waiting for my SE to get back to me on this but I wanted to
ping the community to see what has been successfully used in the field.
Proving WAN services in a remote rural area we have several small POP
sites providing minimal customers (some 10 or less).
We are looking to run MPLS i
planned to make more than one member link be supported in IOS-XE
3.4 with MLPoE ?
On 22-8-2011 15:55, Andrew K. wrote:
We were having issues using an ASR1002-F and ASR1002 as an LNS
termination L2TP/PTA sessions.
This has been fixed in the latest IOS release, the bugID for this
issue was
We were having issues using an ASR1002-F and ASR1002 as an LNS
termination L2TP/PTA sessions.
This has been fixed in the latest IOS release, the bugID for this issue
was CSCtj44098.
An other issue with the ASR as LNS is PPPoE Multilink.
IOS-XE 3.4 did introduce MLPoE support, but only one me
I am searching through cisco documentation in an attempt to prove or
disprove my theory and I am wondering if someone has a quick answer.
We are currently running a 7606 with Dual PWR-1900-DC / PEM modules.
With the addition of 10G ports we need to increase the power in the chassis.
I am to in
,
Andrew.
On 3/30/2011 5:29 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 23:23 +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:34 -0400, Andrew K. wrote:
To achieve this I am trying to use layer 2 local switching between two
router ports on a ES20 (7600-ES20-GE3C) card.
[...]
connect
I am attempting to aggregate multiple layer 2 switches into a 7606
(12.2(33)SRE3) but I do not want the 7606 being part of the layer 2 network.
To achieve this I am trying to use layer 2 local switching between two
router ports on a ES20 (7600-ES20-GE3C) card.
The configuration seems simple e
o terminate any kind of sessions (such as LNS) without
even purchasing the license. Correct ?
Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
Y.
2011/2/1 Piotr Wojciechowski
On 1/31/11 9:56 PM, Andrew K. wrote:
Does anyone have any experience purchasing this license for an ASR1002?
The Cisco site
Does anyone have any experience purchasing this license for an ASR1002?
The Cisco site does not offer much information about it, the only real
information is followed :
hxxp://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-447652.html
I am looking to find out how to input t
A little hard to compare but I've seen an NPE-G1 hold 4000 sessions with
a 70% average CPU usage.
Andrew.
On 12/3/2010 11:32 AM, Stephane MAGAND wrote:
Hi
I am search a information:
How many L2TP/LNS session (for Adsl pppoe) can support a NPE 400 ?
Thanks
Stephane
__
We, a moderately sized ISP, attempted to upgrade our current 7206VXR
NPE-G2 to an ASR 1002-F as an LNS but we ran into some issues. The ASR
would start to ignore sessions and the only fix was to reload the
device. This seemed to start happening after about 2000 PPPoE and 4000
PPPoE over VPDN
31 matches
Mail list logo
