On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:24:17PM +0100, Brian Turnbow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Dears,
> >
> > Anyone know what is wrong with the below range ?
>
> Yep, host bits are set
> You need to put in the network
X.X.X.80 is a valid network for a /28.
> > router ospf 386
> > vrf AAA
> > area
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:50:39AM +, Jeff Bacon wrote:
On 11/21/2011 06:59 PM, Jeff Bacon wrote:
Is there some better way to handle this? Or do I just do the
virtual-links/dual-connects and accept the hack?
Do you actually need areas? How many routes are involved?
There's
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 08:04:00PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:12:44AM -0500, Tony Varriale wrote:
Then hire someone that knows what they are doing.
Am I the only one to find that sort of remark a bit nasty?
While not sporting any nice certificates, I consider
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:53:18AM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/01/2011 07:57, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
its on Cisco 7606-S , the connection is port channel with 5 physical
interfaces
Oh, you Really Don't Want To Do That(tm). For etherchannels on
EARL7 architecture, if you want your
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:40:32PM -0500, Todd Shipway wrote:
I've got a rather basic question, or at least I hope it is.
A customer is trying to migrate from a point-to-point setup to a
point-to-multipoint setup. I'm trying to help them with this by
supplying serial and multilink ppp
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 07:24:51PM +0700, Rin wrote:
Hi group,
We need to design a MPLS network that has around 100 nodes (7600) divided
into Core, Aggregation Access layer. OSPF and MPLS is deployed up to
access layer. According to Cisco, an OSPF area should have no more than 50
nodes in
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:34:50PM +0100, Zoe O'Connell wrote:
On 23/08/10 13:07, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Zoe O'Connell:
729078: Aug 22 16:21:39 MDT: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor A.B.C.D
3/1 (update malformed) 21 bytes 31FE420C 31FE58C8 124683E8 0206CC67 00
729079: Aug 22
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:30:51AM -0600, victor wrote:
Maybe someone would know why when router receives DHCP offer on a vrf
interface the default route (option 3) gets installed in the main routing
table and NOT in the corresponding VRF? Here is a piece of config and show
ip route outputs:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:46:24AM -0800, Yuri Bank wrote:
I understand that they use different frequency ranges, but why can't the DSL
freqencies be converted and sent over fiber somewhere between the CPE and
the DSLAM ?
They could be. Do you think installing devices to do that at the point
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:49:40PM -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
I've come across route-leaking examples but they all require me to point
traffic to an outward-facing interface. Ie, I can't just point the
default route to a specific upstream-facing interface. Is there another
way? I
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Murphy, William wrote:
In all recent IOS versions and switching hardware you can disable
VLAN 1 on trunk ports (switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1) and
the protocols you mentioned will still continue to function. This is
how Cisco recommends you
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:23:45PM +0200, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
The last time I've seen discussion on this topic, you had to have an
external back-to-back connection between a VRF interface and a global
interface.
Depending on the platform, you can do it with a GRE tunnel with both
ends on
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:03:08PM +0100, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
Well, it looks like the linux NAT/firewall is not NAT'ing the
keepalive GRE packets correctly, otherwise they would not arrive with
the 172.16.1.1 src address on router2. Not sure what's happening
there, but I would
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 04:26:09AM +0200, Mario Spinthiras wrote:
Most beneficial is to port-channel the interfaces. This is clever in many
ways. Handling the interface redundancy any other way complicates things
IMHO. With a port-channel interface you have more bandwidth and redundancy.
And
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:43:10PM -0400, Mike Johnson wrote:
What happens if a layer 2 switch receives a frame that needs to be
forwarded out the same port that the incoming frame was received on?
It will discard it.
Back when Layer 2 switches were typically used to connect multiple
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:28:09PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
Tony Varriale wrote:
Are they cheaper once you buy the software license? Let's not forget,
the software license is not transferrable.
That's a typical oops not only in this method but from 3rd party resellers.
This may be
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:06:01AM -0500, Tolstykh, Andrew wrote:
You can schedule a simple job in Kiwi Cattools (freeware up to 5 managed
devices).
KRON supports only the exec level cli commands.
I haven't tried it but would assume that the exec level command
copy flash:filename
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:57:39PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At 05:00 AM 07-06-07 -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
Also depends if you have the priority set and who came up first.
From the OSPF Design Guide:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/104/1.html
DR and BDR election is done via the
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:51:29PM +0200, Jerome Covini wrote:
There is only one 'vlan1'
if you have vlan1 on more than one interface (eg: gig1/1 and gig1/2)
they are actually the same vlan. This device is a switch, not an
independent router.
You should be able to 'no
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 02:32:22PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
7600/Sup720 will do whatever you need, provided you use a different local
address for each tunnel source (if you have multiple tunnels on the
same local IP address, the hardware can't do the tunneling, and the CPU
is much
20 matches
Mail list logo
