I am just wondering how many people have ICMP Destination Unreachables
disabled on their core routers. Could an CPE router, which may
encapsulate data, be able to depend on ICMP Unreachables to be sent to
it?
I know there are many cases where router implementations default it to
off (to
It would be interesting to hear from this community what you think
about:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farinacci-lisp-06.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fuller-lisp-alt-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-00.txt
Does this mean Cisco are positioning the Nexus 7010 (and
other forthcoming models in the series) as a replacement of
the 6500 for a pure Layer 2 control plane application that
is looking beyond 40Gbps/slot and/or 80Gbps/slot, e.g.,
high speed core Ethernet switching within a single site?
