Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Android or iphone apps?

2011-01-12 Thread Eninja
John, Pingsta recently released an iphone (droid coming soon) app for its TAC-in-the-Cloud(tm) engineers in NA. http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pingsta-ice/id385669606?mt=8 Should be available globally shortly with a customer version on the horizon. /eninja Sent from my iPhone. On Jan 12

Re: [c-nsp] Unstable IOS Version for LNS on Cisco 7206 NPE-G2

2010-11-12 Thread Eninja
software bugs in IOS. I understand some folks enjoy commenting, but it should always be to add value rather than throwing out unfounded speculations without factual data to back it up. /eninja ex-Technical Leader - OS & big fat (and skinny) routers. On Nov 12, 2010, at 3:17 AM,

Re: [c-nsp] Unstable IOS Version for LNS on Cisco 7206 NPE-G2

2010-11-12 Thread Eninja
your case and move on to the next one. Your VAM might have failed, but it's failure is a separate issue from your SegV outage. eninja www.multiven.com - simple, efficient & affordable maintenance for all networks™ On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Kevin Graham wrote: > > >>

Re: [c-nsp] Unstable IOS Version for LNS on Cisco 7206 NPE-G2

2010-11-11 Thread Eninja
would be a misdiagnosis. eninja :-) www.multiven.com - simple, efficient & affordable maintenance for all networks™ On Nov 11, 2010, at 2:27 PM, "Matlock, Kenneth L" wrote: > Exactly! > > The only way to determine 100% if it's a hardware problem or software problem &

Re: [c-nsp] Unstable IOS Version for LNS on Cisco 7206 NPE-G2

2010-11-11 Thread Eninja
Ken, Rather than speculate, do you have an actual example of a crash that IOS reported as 'SegV exception' that was caused by failed hardware? People come here for answers, not speculation. eninja On Nov 11, 2010, at 6:08 AM, "Matlock, Kenneth L" wrote: > Always

Re: [c-nsp] Unstable IOS Version for LNS on Cisco 7206 NPE-G2

2010-11-10 Thread Eninja
Michael, 'stuck bits'? SegV exceptions are _always_ caused by software bugs. http://bit.ly/98QqhO eninja ;-) On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:56 PM, Michael Loftis wrote: > SegV is most certainly not always software. Stuck bits in IO memory or in > memory used by a PPP session d

Re: [c-nsp] Unstable IOS Version for LNS on Cisco 7206 NPE-G2

2010-11-10 Thread Eninja
provider to resolve it. /eninja www.multiven.com - simple, efficient & affordable maintenance for all networks™ On Nov 10, 2010, at 11:33 AM, "Dominic Ogbonna" wrote: > (a.) Running Cisco 7206VXR with NPE-G2 > (b.) Currently running c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRD

Re: [c-nsp] %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Failure of ACTIVE processor detected, resetting

2010-11-06 Thread Eninja
Antonio, Were crashinfo files generated by the RP & SP? If yes, feel free to unicast and I'll take a look. eninja www.multiven.com - simple, efficient & affordable maintenance for all networks™ On Nov 5, 2010, at 3:27 PM, "Antonio Soares" wrote: > The active

Re: [c-nsp] %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Failure of ACTIVE processor detected, resetting

2010-11-05 Thread Eninja
The question is why did the active SP fail to respond to heartbeat messages from the standby? Grab the sh tech, crashinfo files from the former active SP and contact your maintenance service provider to troubleshoot. eninja www.multiven.com - simple, efficient & affordable maintenance for

Re: [c-nsp] Spanning-Tree Loop (12.2.18SXF7)

2010-11-05 Thread Eninja
e storms and a once-in-while proactive reboot will go a long way to coalesce fragmented memory blocks. eninja www.multiven.com - simple, efficient & affordable maintenance for all networks™ On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:25 AM, "Antonio Soares" wrote: > Hello group, > > I'

Re: [c-nsp] 12810 oddness for halloween =)

2010-10-30 Thread Eninja
wice -sh contr fia (from an "attach" session to any two LCs in slots 0 - 7) - twice -sh diag -sh log eninja www.multiven.com - simple, efficient & affordable maintenance for all networks™ On Oct 30, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: > So, > > Oct 30 11:29:55 EDT:

Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

2010-04-30 Thread eNinja
Where is 'here'? Where are these equipment located (geographically)? You still need to research what changed in the locale, atmosphere, network, environment etc. prior to these events occuring. Stay calm, the answer is out there ;-) eninja On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:25 AM, Mike

Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

2010-04-29 Thread eNinja
Let's apply logic... 1 - What changed prior to the 'events'? 2 - What's common to all the impacted devices experiencing the 'events'? Location, vendor, etc 3 - Which other devices could be experiencing similar 'events' but aren't. Eninja

Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

2010-04-28 Thread eNinja
iance when handling components. Eninja On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Mike cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com> wrote: Howdy, Well that was fun, I discovered that my trusty 7204vxr reloaded unexpectedly and I find myself without a good explanation. Show version gives me 'processor me

Re: [c-nsp] GSR: Failed to Allocate MBUS Channel / Fabric Handing Faield: Invalid bandwidth mode.

2010-03-08 Thread Eninja
the errors? /Eninja On Mar 8, 2010, at 2:48 PM, bharath kondi wrote: HI Everyone, Good day to you. I have some issues with our GSR 12012 router, kindly check the below log. This log is taken just before i lost connection to my router. Can anyone tell me what is wrong with our router.

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR rebooted by watchdog hard reset with PA-FE in slot 1

2010-03-08 Thread Eninja
Youssef, You've answered your own question- you have a bad slot 1. Check to see if there are any bent pins in it/make sure the PAs actually seat properly in it. ITMT, avoid using slot 1 to prevent further reloads. /eninja "When I remove the PA-FE from slot 1 or insert it in an

Re: [c-nsp] 'show isis database' delayed crash on 15.0(1)M1

2010-02-07 Thread Eninja
Bryan, Your box crashed because the memory got corrupted. This is a software bug. Set it up for a core dump and send to bug manufacturer for rectification. /eninja On Feb 7, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Bryan Fields wrote: I was trouble shooing my network today and found a nasty little bug

Re: [c-nsp] CIsco 6509-E issues

2009-12-29 Thread Eninja
If you can log into the device, it is not down ;-) What does a 'sh ver' say? /eninja On Dec 29, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Renelson Panosky wrote: I am experiencing a small problem with one of my Cisco 6509-E on my network, My management device (SNMP) showing one of my switch is

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E crash after bringing up lots of BGP sessions

2009-12-07 Thread Eninja
Much better, SP crashed with a bus error. Can you broad/unicast a 'sh tech' and logs? Eninja On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:33 PM, "Andy B." wrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: Without a crashinfo, you're not going to be able to proceed. Just

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E crash after bringing up lots of BGP sessions

2009-12-03 Thread Eninja
Andy, Your snipped 'sh ver' post is inadequate to understand the root cause of this problem. Unicast or broadcast a full 'sh ver' (prior to a reload), 'sh stack', and crashinfo files from both SP and RP if available. eninja On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:31 PM,

Re: [c-nsp] 2821 spurious reload

2009-12-02 Thread Eninja
On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: On 2009-12-02 20:24, Eninja wrote: Pete, Get off the T train to 15.0. T train is too unstable to be run in _any_ production network and should _only_ be used when there is absolutely no alternative. Actually, the 15.0M *is* the

Re: [c-nsp] 2821 spurious reload

2009-12-02 Thread Eninja
Pete, Get off the T train to 15.0. T train is too unstable to be run in _any_ production network and should _only_ be used when there is absolutely no alternative. Eninja PS. Rodney, feel free to post the release notes of sv85009 so others can be enlightened about its cause and effect

Re: [c-nsp] 2821 spurious reload

2009-11-30 Thread Eninja
Pete, This is a software issue. The address - 0x1E - is invalid. Eninja On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Pete Barnwell wrote: I've had a 2821 reload unexpectedly -sh ver shows a bus error as below Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(22)T1, RE

Re: [c-nsp] FABRIC-3-ERR_HANDLE

2009-11-25 Thread Eninja
Cool /eninja On Nov 25, 2009, at 12:22 PM, "Antonio Soares" wrote: Just to let you know that the problem is resolved after the CSC0 replacement. Thanks. Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S) amsoa...@netcabo.pt From: Eninja [mailto:eni...@gmail.com] Sent: qu

Re: [c-nsp] FABRIC-3-ERR_HANDLE

2009-11-18 Thread Eninja
'Exec-on' commands are sent via IPC over the switch fabric and 'attach' sessions go over the mbus. Eninja On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Aaron wrote: So, what is the difference in output from doing exec-on vs attach? You are still connecting via the same method. On Mon

Re: [c-nsp] how not to write a release note

2009-11-17 Thread Eninja
. Eninja On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:57 PM, "Arie Vayner (avayner)" wrote: Well, as feedback for the issue raised, the bug you flagged is not causing anything other than a traceback message... Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisc

Re: [c-nsp] FABRIC-3-ERR_HANDLE

2009-11-17 Thread Eninja
Cool. ITMT, you may want to shut down CSC0 with a 'hw-module...' to minimize further impact to the fabric and clear fabric errors on all LCs. A fresh 'sh contr fia' (repeated a few times) thereafter should reveal 0 CRCs. Eninja On Nov 17, 2009, at 1:36 PM, "

Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406

2009-10-15 Thread Eninja
Any worthwhile "real world" feedback would involve folks understanding what protocols and technologies you intend to deploy rather than just a list of LCs. Eninja On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Leif Sawyer wrote: I understand this. My point is that Feature Navigator is not a

Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406

2009-10-15 Thread Eninja
GSR 12Ks only run DCEF. So any software suitable for this platform will support DCEF. Feature navigator is imperfect - like a lot of 'tools' on CCO. Eninja On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Leif Sawyer wrote: I'm stating a that Feature Set Navigator is unstable for purposes

Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406

2009-10-15 Thread Eninja
Leif, Not sure what you're asking but GSR 12K is a distributed platform where each LC switches packets independently of the RPand whatever IOS is running on the box. Eninja On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Leif Sawyer wrote: In the process of upgrading from a c12008 to a c

Re: [c-nsp] GSR CPU Process is very HIGH 95%

2009-10-08 Thread Eninja
e minimal impact on RP CPUs. Bottomline, the whole idea of distributed switching is to take the 'load' off the RP and 'outsource' packet switching to the ingress LCs. Therefore, RP CPU on a distributed architecture platform that is configured well _should_ never be und

Re: [c-nsp] GSR CPU Process is very HIGH 95%

2009-10-07 Thread Eninja
y be re-phrased to say "contact your maintenance service provider" - which may or may not be Cisco ;-) Eninja On Oct 7, 2009, at 3:22 PM, "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" > wrote: bharath kondi <mailto:bluffmaster4hea...@gmail.com> wrote on Wednesday, Octob

Re: [c-nsp] Troubleshooting High CPU

2009-08-31 Thread Eninja
onsite personnel pull out traffic-laden cables one by one until device is responsive, grab captures before reinserting cable/s). -Eninja PS. Disable console logging On Aug 31, 2009, at 10:46 PM, David Warner wrote: Hi All, Just wondering if I can get some advice. We have two routers

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 hang while writing SP crashinfo?

2009-08-18 Thread Eninja
rom SP and console logs. -Eninja On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:04 PM, Kevin Graham > wrote: We had a Sup720B (non-redundant, running modular SXI) crash, due to what looks like was due to a CPU_MONITOR watchdog event. What was nasty though was that rather than reload, it hung (dead and

Re: [c-nsp] RES: Feedback on Bug Toolkit (BTK), IOS Software Download Planner, etc...

2009-08-17 Thread Eninja
"Shared Support" is a variant of SMARTnet where Cisco and its partners 'share support' delivery. Wilson, To simplify. - Make the Bug toolkit and Bug fixes freely available to all customers that have purchased Cisco software. -Eninja On Aug 17, 2009, at 2:07 PM,

Re: [c-nsp] SSH no longer functions after hostname change

2009-08-10 Thread Eninja
Jon, What is different with respect to software version, SSH config & platform between this swtich and the dozen others that (could be seeing a similar problem but) aren't? -Eninja On Aug 10, 2009, at 6:19 PM, Jon Wolberg wrote: Hi Paul- The funny thing is this is the on

Re: [c-nsp] SFC DOWN

2009-08-02 Thread Eninja
That 'spam' was the result of a Pingsta mailserver bug. What exactly has that got to do with working smarter? Eninja On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote: Gert Doering wrote: Contributors to this list should just post to this list. Archives are available in m

Re: [c-nsp] CSC CARD info

2009-08-01 Thread Eninja
ondary CSC. Eninja On Aug 1, 2009, at 9:06 AM, jack daniels wrote: Hi all, what is significance of slot no of CSC. If we use 2 CSC and 3 SFC When I do OIR of slot 17 CSC ( when MASTER ) we get 3 ping drops for transit traffic through the router. When I do OIR of slot 16 CSC ( when MASTE

Re: [c-nsp] GSR 12008 GRP ISSUES

2009-07-22 Thread Eninja
to reset it via the MBUS and then marks it dead via the MBUS-6-DEADSCDY. You should reinsert it to see if a reseat clears the problem before an RMA. Eninja On Jul 21, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Chris Lane wrote: Slot0 we think has a defective GRP, we removed and errors are gone. I have a new

Re: [c-nsp] Two events in EEM

2009-06-15 Thread Eninja
Inder, Sounds like you're a Cisco software development engineer. Shouldn't this be sent to a Cisco internal list rather than a public list? Eninja ;) On Jun 15, 2009, at 5:57 AM, Rishi Kochar wrote: hi i work for cisco in UC technology. i am very new to EEM. I dont deal with

Re: [c-nsp] %IPC-SPSTBY-5-WATERMARK errors on dual-sup 6500 & SXI

2009-05-01 Thread Eninja
ather critical housekeeping function) In the meantime, you may want to start reviewing what's different between your other working boxes and this one with regards to IPC (what do your 'show ipc ' say?) and IOS image. Eninja On Apr 30, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Phil Mayers wrote

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 sup720-3bxl crash

2009-04-26 Thread Eninja
Sig 20 = cache parity exception aka parity errors. Take no action for now and only replace mem/board should this recur within a 12-month window. In the meantime, ensure you follow proper ESD procedures when handling devices/modules/memory etc. Eninja On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:23 PM, o