Leave out the spaces. show run | inc channel10\.1911
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
On 9/1/21 12:55 AM, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
Does anyone know how to make a:
show run | i
The symptoms you described seem to indicate that, but without more information
it’s hard to tell.
--
Jerry Bacon
StarTouch - Senior Network Engineer
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 22, 2021, at 11:12 AM, Scott Miller wrote:
>
> What do you mean by NAT might be the problem? I also
I think the NAT might be the problem. Also you need to add the 192.168.4.1
gateway.
--
Jerry Bacon
StarTouch - Senior Network Engineer
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 21, 2021, at 11:30 AM, Scott Miller wrote:
>
> Wondering if anyone has configured a 901 as a DHCP server. It's b
Is there anyone using multi-chassis LACP on ME3600X switches in a
production environment? If so, what IOS version, and what to watch out for?
Thanks.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet
a spike in CPU utilization just before it died.
What does this mean? Is there anything I can do to fix it? Is it likely
to happen again?
Thanks.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
ouples the VLAN encapsulation on the two sides.
Thanks again for all your help.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
On 1/12/2021 9:22 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 18:02
;t get any actual traffic across the VC. Upgrading to 16.7.1,
without any other changes, makes it work.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
On 1/12/2021 9:02 AM, James Bensley wrote:
I set this up with a different ASR920 running 16.7.1 and it works. So
there must be some issue with 3.18.5 (15.6(2)).
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
On 1/6/2021 2:30 AM, James
gured: autosense)
SSO Descriptor: 10.100.25.11/95, local label: 165
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 90237/65659 (used), PWID: 24
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 442, send 1
transit byte totals: receive 31804, send 90
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0,
VPWS name: test1, State: UP
Te0/0/25 Te0/0/25:95(Eth VLAN) 0 UP UP
pw100038 10.100.25.11:95(MPLS) 0 UP UP
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
On 1/
Ethernet
Destination address: 10.100.25.11, VC ID: 95, VC status: up
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 43471, send 0
I have tried both with and without a rewrite on each side, with no
difference.
Ideas, thoughts, suggestions are welcome.
Thanks.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network
rything came up working.
(I had thought about that vlan mode, but the 6500 only has Ethernet or
IP as options, so I didn't think that was it.)
Thanks for your help.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics
I _am_ doing a service instance on the ASR, but not on the 6500 (it
doesn't support them - SUP720).
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
On 1/25/2018 2:17 PM, Bryan Tabb wrote
S2
--+-+--+-+--
UP pri ac Gi0/0:100(Eth VLAN) UP mpls
10.100.101.1:100 UP
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
___
Definitely agree that Solarwinds and, to a lesser extent, PRTG are much
more oriented to the enterprise than service providers.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
On 7/27/2017 12:23
ave many
sites (as we do).
The other I have some experience with is WhatsUp Gold, but when we
evaluated a recent version a while back it was very slow.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Se
Just put each ISP on their own sub-interface.
(Not sure why in the world you would have two different, unrelated
connections on the same sub-interface.)
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet
In my experience, once you get above about 90%, you have to be worried. Any
large bump in the routing can very easily cause memory exhaustion and
subsequent meltdown.
If you can keep it at around 70%, you shouldn't have any issues.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch
There isn't EIGRP but there _IS_ RIP? Really? I thought this was 2016.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp
ion l2tpv3 pw-class 200
^^^
> pseudowire-class 2521
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
Yes, I know the problem is the small buffers, but what surprised me was the
difference between access and trunk modes.
I will look for the information on the port queue adjustments as most of the
ports will have fairly low utilization.
Thanks.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
packet rates). We've tracked it down to output queue
drops, but I don't understand why it's different for access vs. trunk.
Any ideas? And would QOS tuning be likely to help?
Thanks.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext
On 2/27/2013 4:28 PM, Randy wrote:
a stab in the dark:
on R1 BGP-
a)is auto-summary enabled?
or perhaps
b)aggregate-addr with summary-only?
No, neither of those apply in this case. Auto-summary is disabled, and
I'm not doing any aggregation.
./Randy
--- On Wed, 2/27/13, Jerry
On 2/28/2013 10:14 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Jerry Bacon wrote:
On 2/27/2013 7:45 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
Or simplify things more by using prefix filters / route-maps on the
customer BGP sessions to deny/accept+tag routes with communities
that tell the rest of your network
han monster filters at the border where you'll lose track of why
things are there.
I do have filters on the customer BGP sessions, but I have to disallow
his AS from my upstreams, or I become a transit for those routes.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network
or prefix-list filters in place?
Nothing that I can see that would affect this advertisement. And I'm
still puzzled as to why it works on R4 but not on R1.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n
On 2/27/2013 3:47 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
On 2/27/13 3:24 PM, Jerry Bacon wrote:
R1#sh ip bgp a.b.c.0/22
BGP routing table entry for a.b.c.0/22, version 406152
Bestpath Modifiers: always-compare-med, deterministic-med
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
11xx1
h might be preventing the re-advertisment?
No, in fact, i have this:
ip prefix-list announce seq 40 deny a.b.48.0/22
ip prefix-list announce seq 41 permit a.b.32.0/19 le 24
The setup on R1 and R4 is virtually the same.
On 2013-02-27, at 6:24 PM, Jerry Bacon wrote:
I have the follow
hat might cause this
behaviour seem to apply. Any ideas on what more to look for?
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
corrupt ... using default values
C7200 platform with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
I had a couple that did that and I was able to fix one of them by
replacing the battery on the I/O card.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54
gw1.armplc(config)#no ip route 216.24.2.8 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54
gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.248 216.24.0.54
%Inconsistent address and mask
A /29 (.248) has to start on a multiple of 8, so x.x.x.4 255.255.255.248
won't work.
--
Jerry
this tread. :-)
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
( below 12.1(3)T)
-wil
The native vlan configurations changed in 12.1(3)T. Notice the
differences in the two examples in the link below.
I think the real change here is that 12.1.(3)T and later allows you to
specify the any VLAN as native.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
e VLAN and
gi0/0.20 will be a tagged VLAN.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
et analyzer going and see what it's doing
"under the covers".
--
Jerry Bacon - StarTouch
Senior Network Engineer
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
I used to used HP Network Node Manager at a previous employer and
thought it did a really good job of automatically mapping the network,
especially since it handled L3 and L2 discovery well after a bit of
tweaking. I'm at a new place now and
Yes, MPLS. For simplest configuration, use cell-relay.
--
Jerry B.
- Original Message -
Is there any way to do ATM over IP in a following scenario?
Something like L2TPv3 but then for ATM instead of Ethernet.
ATM card 7206 <=> IP connection over Gigabit Ethernet <=> ATM card 7206
Which brings up a question I've had for a while. What's the difference
between the 12.0S and the 12.0SY versions?
TIA
--
Jerry B.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Addison"
The 1600 is obsolete too, but you can still get images for that.
Looks like you can still get GRP images thr
Check the other end and make sure it is also up. I've seen cases where the
PE router on one side shows the circuit as "up", but the other PE router
will show it as "down".
--
Jerry B.
- Original Message -
the vc still is up,but the eompls does't work suddenly.
i got the show messag
39 matches
Mail list logo