That will reject any route, not just your 0/0 route. Remove the "le 32" to only
match a default (0.0.0.0/0 exact).
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject:
You can specify "neighbor allowas-in" to bypass this check. I'd
proceed carefully if using it... as you are defeating one of the loop detection
mechanisms, filter well.
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rudy Setiawan
Sent: Tuesd
There is also bti photonics... never used any of their active gear, but I'm
very happy with their passive stuff.
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk -
iNAME
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:56 PM
To: 'Fredrik Jacobsson'; ci
global option...
logging event link-status default
(there is also "logging event link-status boot" to suppress the messages during
bootup)
or
interface option...
logging event link-status
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Holemans Wim
S
I do have to agree with Ben on this one... shutdown/negation of shutdown is one
of the last things I would say is counter-intuitive... with JunOS the
equivalent would be "deactivate interfaces ge-0/0/0" to shutdown ge-0/0/0. They
are active by default when you create the entries for them and com
Minus the fallthrough access-list, that won't work... brain is tired.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Crawford
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 12:04 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Wanting to learn Ju
This is all my opinion, obviously and I really don't want to start a flame war
etc etc, but I cannot leave this one alone...
I have Ciscos and will continue to have them... lets face it, they are easy to
get a hold of used, and for the money you cannot beat the power...
Some other nice things a
There is a very unsupported way to learn... you can be the judge of the legal
implications of it etc etc
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive
However you can get your hands on a j-series series off of ebay pretty easily.
It will get you a long way, and will run the latest releases...
The port-channel config should be the one used. If you do a show
spanning-tree, you should notice that your port-channels will show up, but
the member interfaces will not. Other vendors show the member interfaces as
stp disabled due to being a port channel member, cisco just does not show
the inter
the worst (hopefully, I havent tried this) is Cisco will
come back and tell you it is unsupported and you need to try a supported
transceiver to troubleshoot with.
-Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 10:49 AM
To: 'Fr
>Is it enough that it runs fine without
>service unsupported transceiver
>and
>disable detect cause gbic-invalid?
If your gbic requires those to run then it probably isnt a "counterfeit"
supported transciever, it is just flat out unsupported. That said, a few
that we use at work are unsupported an
Your regex should accomplish what you want... as long as you are prefix
filtering your peers incoming and/or filtering your outgoing prefix
announcements then you should be ok... if you are not then you are leaving
yourself open to the possibility of a peer accidentally or intentionally
announcing
Jeff,
We are running 12.2(33)SXH on one of our Cat6.5k's and 12.2(18)SXE6 on the
other... I'd go with the upgrade, there are some nice features like tcp-mss
settings under tunnels, and a few other things I cannot recall right now
that I have missed when going from the newer to older. I've not seen
http://www.apnic.net/db/ranges.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 9:50 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] IP blocks from Asian RIRs?
Is there a good way to retrieve a list o
The prepeding should have nothing to do with your lack of connectivity
through Cogent. All the prepending would do is possibly make another route
look more desireable due to the as-path. They already append their ASN when
you pass through their AS.
As a second note... are you allowing UDP ports fo
Would be interesting to try... but when you are within an AS there are many
other factors at play... I kinda doubt it would work.
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: Tim Durack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:12 AM
To: Jonathan Crawford
Cc: Cisco-nsp
Subject
them and get the
same effect.
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: Tim Durack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 10:27 AM
To: Jonathan Crawford
Cc: Cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Level3/Cogent/HVDataNet specific routing problem -
looking for suggestions
I was hoping
17 matches
Mail list logo
