Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-23 Thread L'argent
L'argent wrote: Gert Doering wrote: On the interface that forms the EoMPLS bridge ("towards the customer"), you should NOT enable any MPLS stuff. (I'm not sure what happens if you do, but that's not required). Ok. Removed. You need the MPLS stuff on the 10G int

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-23 Thread L'argent
Gert Doering wrote: On the interface that forms the EoMPLS bridge ("towards the customer"), you should NOT enable any MPLS stuff. (I'm not sure what happens if you do, but that's not required). Ok. Removed. You need the MPLS stuff on the 10G interface that interconnects the routers. The

[c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-22 Thread L'argent
Setup: Two directly connected Sup32's directly connected one running 12.2-33.SXH5, the other 12.2-33.SXI1 otherwise identical configurations. Goal: Test (new) MPLS configuration using EoMPLS (xconnect) between G4/2 on each. I want to transport 1G over a 10G link between two sites. Problem: T

[c-nsp] 3560E wire-speed or not?

2009-04-16 Thread L'argent
Quick question regarding whether a 3560E is wire-speed or not. According to the Cisco website here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7078/prod_models_comparison.html For example, I don't see how a 3560E-12D and a 3560-12SD can both be wirespeed when their max PPS is different only by a

[c-nsp] Small IAD - Voip to PRI

2008-12-24 Thread L'argent
I'm looking for a small box, pref Cisco, that will take 23 channels of VOIP and hand it off as a PRI suitable for use in a Norstar/Meridian phone system. [transparent SIP gateway basically -- pass through caller id/name/etc] I believe a ISR 1841 can do it, but I'm not 100%. Anyone been here/