[c-nsp] Problem with the same route in the general routing table and in vrf

Good morning, I need to insert a route in the general routing table and in a VRF. Reading on Internet, I thought to use ip vrf receive command on the interface. this is CS router : hostname CS ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip vrf VTC ! interface Loopback1021030 ip vrf

[c-nsp] Problem with ip vrf receive command

Good morning, I need to insert a route in the general routing table and in a VRF. Reading on Internet, I thought to use ip vrf receive command on the interface. this is CS router : hostname CS ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip vrf VTC ! interface Loopback1021030 ip vrf

Re: [c-nsp] Problem with ip vrf receive command

for your ping source please? adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Luca Tortiglione Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:39 AM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] Problem with ip vrf receive command Good morning

Re: [c-nsp] Problem with ip vrf receive command

I know RD and route-target are used only by BGP. 2012/8/9 Aaron aar...@gvtc.com: Doesn't a vrf require an rd to even be functional? Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Luca Tortiglione Sent

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K limitations

You can run one eigrp instance. Inviato da iPhone Il giorno 27/giu/2012, alle ore 23:56, MKS rekordmeis...@gmail.com ha scritto: We are in the process of evaluating the ASR9K as a next gen platform I would like to ask you, what was most surprising about the platform, e.g. I expected that