Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 local L2 bridge or local PW

2020-03-13 Thread Mark Tees
fi192.168.0.92 1 UP > > VFI 1 vfi192.168.0.96 1 UP > > > Router# > > -- > *From:* cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark > Tees > *Sent:* Thursday, March 12, 2020 11:45 PM

[c-nsp] ASR1000 local L2 bridge or local PW

2020-03-12 Thread Mark Tees
Hey guys, Has anyone got any form of local L2 working on ASR1000? Still seems broken in latest code I have and needed it for a customer. By broken I mean MAC's are learnt inside bridge domain but on either ingress or egress tagging is something unexpected. I still need to confirm PCAP. I was usi

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 IOS XE / ISG L2 DHCP subscribers

2020-01-07 Thread Mark Tees
1 remote-id radius-server attribute 31 append-circuit-id radius-server configure-nas radius-server retransmit 2 On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 at 03:06, James Bensley wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 07:18, Mark Tees wrote: > > > > Hi listers, > > > > I was wondering if anyone o

[c-nsp] ASR1000 IOS XE / ISG L2 DHCP subscribers

2019-11-06 Thread Mark Tees
Hi listers, I was wondering if anyone out there has an example config of ISG L2 DHCP subscribers with AAA controlled VRF membership. Happy to pay for it. My next step is TAC. I have a basic setup working with a dynamic VLAN interface and IP pool working with auth to RADIUS. What hasn't worked is

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 3548 No Traffic on a Port

2019-06-18 Thread Mark Tees
What's the port status? Are there logs? On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 11:55, Nick Cutting wrote: > > What is the port? > > There is a certain port on that code that stops passing traffic like 17 or > something > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Mike Hammett > Sent: Tuesday,

[c-nsp] Cisco NSO/NCS

2019-06-16 Thread Mark Tees
Hey guys, I am trying to find out ballpark pricing on licensing/using Cisco NSO (Tail-F NCS product). If anyone can possibly share something around this please direct message me. Cheers, Mark ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR vs Juniper

2017-05-12 Thread Mark Tees
From memory when I last asked that question HCOS/HQOS was still an MX only thing :( That was why the ASR920's were so handy for me. On 12 May 2017 at 18:51, James Bensley wrote: > On 10 May 2017 at 22:08, Aaron Gould wrote: >> I also like what I've seen recently in the Juniper ACX5048 (48/72 -

Re: [c-nsp] Segment Routing

2017-01-03 Thread Mark Tees
d you say that if I > learn about RSVP-TE and what I can accomplish with it, that I should NOT > move in that direction, but spend time deploying SR and then benefit from > the easier TE ? > > > > Thanks again Mark, > > > > -Aaron > > > > From: Mark Tees

Re: [c-nsp] Segment Routing

2017-01-03 Thread Mark Tees
Two benefits I can think of: Label distribution without having to worry about LDP or LDPv6. Easy TE cases without having to worry about the state that comes with RSVP-TE. On Wednesday, 4 January 2017, Aaron wrote: > I run an MPLS network for an ISP and have heard about SR/SPRING but I don't

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1K forwarding failures on 10G SPA's

2016-10-03 Thread Mark Tees
That sounds like what I experienced in ASR920 land recently with bad packets filling up interface input queues causing a wedge. When it happens check the interface input queues and save the output. The resolution for us so far has been tight CoPP with discards, iACLs, and the like to only allow t

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 software images

2016-07-29 Thread Mark Tees
TAC have come to the rescue and provided the images manually. Thank you for the replies. Mark On Wednesday, 27 July 2016, Mark Tees wrote: > Hello C-listers, > > I have an ASR920 that was bought refurb and I am currently jumping > through the hoops to get support but due to it

[c-nsp] ASR920 software images

2016-07-27 Thread Mark Tees
Hello C-listers, I have an ASR920 that was bought refurb and I am currently jumping through the hoops to get support but due to it still being under the previous owners name it's probably going to be painful/drawn out. I was wondering if anyone could ping me with a download for the below image or

Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR with NPE-G2 / 12.4(4)XD4

2014-01-30 Thread Mark Tees
Thanks everyone. I am going with the 15.2 train. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Steve Glendinning wrote: > I have two 7204VXR with NPE-G2 running 15.2(4) S3 for some time. It's >> doing BGP, but no OSPF, but it's been very stable. >> > > 15.1(3)S3 is also very stable for us on both NPE-G1 and

Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR with NPE-G2 / 12.4(4)XD4

2014-01-27 Thread Mark Tees
Can anyone recommend a 15.x release for these devices? The device is only doing BGP + OSPF with a small amount of connected routes. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Mark Tees wrote: > Point taken. Will arrange to do so. > > Thank you. > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:57 AM,

Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR with NPE-G2 / 12.4(4)XD4

2014-01-27 Thread Mark Tees
Point taken. Will arrange to do so. Thank you. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > On Monday, January 27, 2014 04:40:59 PM Mark Tees wrote: > > > Any pointers for investigating this would be appreciated. > > Can we still get support for those devices? I hav

[c-nsp] 7206VXR with NPE-G2 / 12.4(4)XD4

2014-01-27 Thread Mark Tees
Hi listers, We have a 7200 with NPE-G2 that has happily acted as a border router for around a year. We are only using the onboard interfaces. On Sunday night the device randomly rebooted and the reboot cause shows as "System returned to ROM by error - a Software forced crash, PC 0x6FC26C" from "s

Re: [c-nsp] VTP problem between remote PoP

2013-10-31 Thread Mark Tees
Oh my. It's part of the VTP specification. "VTP frames being sent over a distance of 20 light years will be dropped at random." Or they are just the same as any other frame :) Sent from some sort of iDevice. On 31/10/2013, at 7:30 PM, Andrey Teslenko wrote: > Hello, > > > > We observe

Re: [c-nsp] EEM for BGP

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Tees
Zabbix discovery templates and the BGP4 mib will achieve exactly what you want. Or if you have an existing monitoring system that supports SNMP polling the BGP mib will give you the data. Sent from some sort of iDevice. On 05/08/2013, at 6:20 PM, amir agha wrote: > Hi list, > Is that possible

[c-nsp] Cisco ASR1002 software images in the wild

2013-08-02 Thread Mark Tees
Hi listers, I was wondering what software images people are running out there in the wild on the ASR1000 series and what versions are recommended for stability. The company I work for is about to receive some Cisco ASR1002 units with ESP5. The boxes will be used for border routing (3 full intern

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K Netflow nextas/prevas only?

2012-12-27 Thread Mark Tees
I believe nprobe's proxy mode should do what you want Sent from some sort of iDevice. On 28/12/2012, at 2:19 PM, Mark Tees wrote: > You can also use a tool like nprobe to add in the AS data and push it on > > Sent from some sort of iDevice. > > On 28/12/2012, at 1:57 PM,

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K Netflow nextas/prevas only?

2012-12-27 Thread Mark Tees
You can also use a tool like nprobe to add in the AS data and push it on Sent from some sort of iDevice. On 28/12/2012, at 1:57 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > It's been a while since I've played with netflow, but back in the olden days, > I seem to remember srcas and dstas were pretty useful. I'd

Re: [c-nsp] How to use multiple virtual web servers with one 1 public IP address?

2011-04-26 Thread Mark Tees
Another solution may be to use Mod_Proxy for Apache and proxy off requests to virtual machines behind the proxy HTTP server. There is an example on this page: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/examples.html ProxyPreserveHost On ProxyPass / http://192.168.111.2/ ProxyPassReverse / http://19