There is a lot of talk about how PFC makes Ethernet loss-less and suitable
for FCoE or ISCSI. My question is, for single-type-of-traffic interfaces,
for example ISCSI arrays connected to a Ethernet switch. Why doesn't
traditional PAUSE based flow control give the same level of loss-less
performance
On 12/10/2012 08:23 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 10/12/2012 19:12, Lobo wrote:
Hi everyone. Been having a hard time trying to get a copper SFP to work on
our ME-3600X-24TS-Ms. According to Cisco documentation, the GLC-T SFP is
supposed to be supported on one of the fiber ports. However every Ci
I have a customer who intends to inter-connect two pairs of FibreChannel
switches (Cisco or Brocade) between two DCs, and will be using Transmode
4G FC Transponders to light the black fibers.
The two black fibers are 25km and 70 km. The distance can be handled
with the line optics in the Trans
We help customers "light" fibers by terminating them with simple
switches so the customer can have a monitored 1G or 10G circuit between
two sites using dot1q-tunnel to transparently pass customers VLANs.
As we only provide the customer with 1 client port on the remote device,
there is only on
