Re: [c-nsp] OT Solarwinds Alternatives

We run a bunch of different systems today including Solarwinds. For many years I have dealt with Solarwinds in various companies and found their system to be “not bad” but when it comes to features, especially for service providers, they are less than responsive. They are driven purely by numb

Re: [c-nsp] Slightly off-topic - Network Monitoring software

It also really depends on what you want out of the monitoring system and on what scale. I came from a Solarwinds shop - we really liked it overall but it had a few annoying glitches and some of the interface wasn't intuitive (like alerts). Changed companies a few months back and Observium, Nagios,

Re: [c-nsp] ME3400 high cpu

Can you describe the traffic going through the switch? It looks like the CPU is getting pushed up due to IGMP snooping. Also spanning tree is pretty busy but that could be related to the software switching the debug is referencing. Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-

Re: [c-nsp] Incorrect ASN in Traceroute

default route in the BGP tables, when the 7200 was doing an ASN lookup for local addresses it was matching 0.0.0.0/0 from BGP and associating that to their ASN. Cheers, Paul On 2013-08-07 12:27 PM, "Mark Tinka" wrote: >On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 05:45:25 PM Paul Stewart >w

Re: [c-nsp] Incorrect ASN in Traceroute

Found the issue - sorry for the noise… Paul On 2013-08-07 11:26 AM, "Paul Stewart" wrote: >Hey folks? > >I can't say I've ever run across this and looking for ideas. > >Turning up a 7206VXR for the purpose of being a looking glass. Created >multi hop BGP

[c-nsp] Incorrect ASN in Traceroute

Hey folksŠ I can't say I've ever run across this and looking for ideas. Turning up a 7206VXR for the purpose of being a looking glass. Created multi hop BGP connections to nearest core boxes and everything looks good except the trace route information. They are showing the wrong ASN lookups on

Re: [c-nsp] NetflowAuditor

Going by memory I think we were trying to do 2000 or so FPS Cheers, Paul From: John Elliot Date: Thursday, 20 June, 2013 3:35 PM To: Paul Stewart , Cisco-NSP Subject: RE: [c-nsp] NetflowAuditor > > Thanks Paul - How many flows per second were you doing? > > > I&

Re: [c-nsp] NetflowAuditor

Hey thereŠ. We used it quite some time back and it was "ok". Our issue with it was scaling - once we started to do 1:100 sampling across several routers it had a really difficult time keeping up. The hardware we were using was "beefy" Š. Granted this was quite a while back when we were using GSR

Re: [c-nsp] ip tcp adjust-mss

We used to use "ip tcp adjust-mss" a lot for applications where PPPOE was required. ie Cisco 877 router at customer premise connecting via PPPOE back to us. Never seen it in MPLS core functions though if that's where it's being used.. Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@

Re: [c-nsp] 1811/1841 Performance with PPPOE

Thanks... we'll find out soon enough...;) -Original Message- From: Tom Storey [mailto:t...@snnap.net] Sent: April-04-12 9:42 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 1811/1841 Performance with PPPOE The 1811 is supposedly even more powerful than the lo

[c-nsp] 1811/1841 Performance with PPPOE

Hey folks. Just wondering regarding performance impacts on 1811/1841 when terminating PPPOE on the router? The "router spec sheet" from Cisco (http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/router performance.pdf) shows about 35Mb/s of traffic on one of these routers but

[c-nsp] Dial-Backup / OSPF

Hey folks. Looking for some pointers (docs are fine too). We have a customer that has multiple locations fed by fiber or other dedicated connectivity. At each location we will be also installing an analog phone line for dial-backup purposes. Each remote location also communicates back to our n

Re: [c-nsp] rate-limit problem 7206VXR

-plane ! ! -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 3:56 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] rate-limit problem 7206VXR On 01/10/2012 07:11 AM, Paul Stewart wrote

Re: [c-nsp] rate-limit problem 7206VXR

platforms not too long ago and starting to wonder if that's what is causing this. Appreciate the "second set of eyes" .. Paul From: Tony [mailto:td_mi...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 3:30 PM To: Paul Stewart; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] rat

[c-nsp] rate-limit problem 7206VXR

Hi there. We have some 7206VXR's in place for BRAS functions. They have functioned very well for a number of years.. Recently (past couple of months it seems) we have discovered that rate-limiting isn't working any longer - suddenly it seems. Example customer (connected to DSLAM via AD

Re: [c-nsp] Subnetting problem

You want "ip route 216.24.2.0 255.255.255.248 216.24.0.54" or "ip route 216.24.2.8 255.255.255.248 216.24.0.54" ;) Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joseph Mays Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 3:23 PM

Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco

Cisco or Juniper would be our preference. We won't touch anything that has Brocade attached to it period - too many issues with our customers who have purchased Brocade. Biased opinion more towards Juniper because we are a partner as well ;) Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun

Re: [c-nsp] prefixes in AS-Set

Yeah - we used to filter based on AS-SET at one time - we quickly maxxed out the available memory (for config storage) on Cisco 7600 platforms with Sup720-3BXL's doing this. Now it's just max-prefix except our downstream customers where we specifically run filters to control what they announce to

Re: [c-nsp] configuing 2610XM as an aggregation router

Yes, they work fine for small scale Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Sent: July-19-11 9:47 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; ccie Subject: Re: [c-nsp] configuing 2610XM as an aggregation route

Re: [c-nsp] Average throughput of a Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gig interface?

We've got some doing a lot more than that with no issues. I've seen a G1 do 450Mb/s without major problems (can probaby do more?). Paul On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Scott Granados wrote: Hi, I have a basic question about the Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gigabit interfaces? What do people find is the avera

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 L2TP and Gigawords

tly Let me know if I can be of any other assistance ;) Paul -Original Message- From: Gerald Krause [mailto:g...@ax.tc] Sent: January-19-11 10:35 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7206 L2TP and Gigawords Hi Paul, that's interesting! :) I&#

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 L2TP and Gigawords

Yes, we're running it without any "known issues" on 12.2(33)SRD1 if that helps...;) Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gerald Krause Sent: January-19-11 9:51 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

Re: [c-nsp] DHCP Helper

So sorry - wrong list .. Paul From: Paul Stewart [mailto:p...@paulstewart.org] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:57 PM To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: DHCP Helper Hi folks.. Need to forward all requests for DHCP off to an offsite server .. is there any

[c-nsp] DHCP Helper

Hi folks.. Need to forward all requests for DHCP off to an offsite server .. is there anything else needed from a config perspective? ;) set forwarding-options helpers bootp interface vlan.10 server 192.168.10.10 So anything on VLAN 10 that makes a DHCP request will relay this to 192.16

Re: [c-nsp] Ipv6 traffic management

Are you exporting flow data today by chance? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of VALEY Jean-Michel Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:02 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Ipv6 traffic management A

Re: [c-nsp] 10G DWDM UP/DOWN

Do you have the ability to see the DWDM stats? Is the 10G interface configured to drop when wavelength goes down? We need to figure out if the DWDM equipment, the actual fiber connection, or the router interfaces is the issue here. I'll bank initially on a problem with the DWDM based connection -

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

bject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination On 09/21/2010 08:48 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: > Ok... so here's the latest. > > I put a static route at our Internet edge - we redistribute static into OSPF > so now this /32 destination is able to be seen in the routi

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

No, just OSPF only - we thought about extending BGP to measure the effects (just a BGP default route though as Sup2). I just don't see where that would help though ;) Paul -Original Message- From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: September-21-10 4:34 PM To: Paul Stewa

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

Ok... so here's the latest. I put a static route at our Internet edge - we redistribute static into OSPF so now this /32 destination is able to be seen in the routing table (other than the default originated route). This solves the issue if I statically assign it the next hop (which is their ISP

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

n the surface it appears that only a single /32 is causing us all this grief. The CEF version was taken before the reboot - so it's pretty low again ... Paul -Original Message- From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: September-21-10 3:03 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

are not inline neither... We'll keep poking away - appreciate it.. Paul -Original Message- From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: September-21-10 12:59 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: Gert Doering; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

No, just pure routing ;) Thanks though for the thought... Paul -Original Message- From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: September-21-10 12:35 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination Just a

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

>> dis2-rtr-mb#show ip route xx.xxx.2.226 >> % Network not in table >> dis2-rtr-mb#show ip cef xx.xxx.2.226 >> 0.0.0.0/0, version 8684984, epoch 1, cached adjacency xx.xxx.0.226 >> 0 packets, 0 bytes >> via xx.xxx.0.226, Vlan4, 0 dependencies >>next hop xx.xxx.0.226, Vlan4 >>valid cached a

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:38 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination I need a coffee or 2, I am misreading absolutely everything today!! Ok so that IP is

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:24 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination If my understanding is correct here, then the DSL user is probably blocking inbound icmp so yo

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

t the traceroute would at least transverse our igp properly . Thanks, Paul From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:00 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination If

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

Thank you - good thinking but I checked and there's nothing in there to limit ICMP at all..;) Paul From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:05 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Iss

[c-nsp] Weird Traceroute Issue to Specific Destination

Hi folks.. We have a customer who is connected over DSL who is having issues getting to a certain remote site more often than not. Sometime they can reach this site, but most of the time they cannot. They connect to a 7206VXR, which then connects to a 6509 which then connections to 6509, 6

Re: [c-nsp] GigE Throughput on 3825

We have several in production but have never pushed them to their limits. One that comes to mind is a 3825 with max memory/max flash - it's going DHCP services to 1200 students in a university residence, handing off a few meg of voice traffic to those students and running two full BGP tables provid

Re: [c-nsp] Juniper M320 vs. 7600/SUP320-3BXL and WS-X6148A-GE-TX

Yes, I'd like to throw in that we are migrating to pure MX in our core .. and moving out of 7600 platform (sup720-3bxl). This is partly price related although BGP performance (scanner) was the driving force on this decision. Also, for MPLS the price/features to deploy was much more attractive to u

Re: [c-nsp] QoS on Cisco 2600

2621XM's and I believe 2621's do NBAR no problem... we have it running on XM's in several locations today... Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Wojciechowski Sent: July-01-10 11:22 AM To: Stephane M

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE offered bandwidth

We do 20+ Mb/s connections all the time on PPPOE using Cisco 7206VXR-NPE-G2 today (moving to Juniper but that's a different story). Was that your question or was there something configuration related you were inquiring about? Cheers, Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck

[c-nsp] weird BGP stuff

Hey folks... I'm looking for a second set of eyes here ;) Have a pair of 7606 boxes that have been handling 100's of BGP sessions for a long time now with no problems (well, performance but I'll leave that alone). We added a Juniper MX480 into the mix recently and now seem to be having a r

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS over VLAN

Can someone explain this a bit better for me? ;) Sorry if this is "MPLS 101"... We are getting ready to deploy some equipment (mixture of Cisco/Juniper) that is MPLS capable. We'd like to transport some VPLS traffic however in the middle of a few of the links are layer2 switches - we've been to

[c-nsp] Radius Accounting Question

Hi there.. On a 7206VXR with the following radius configuration, does the accounting packets get delivered to all radius servers or is it something else like round robin? I'm trying to troubleshoot an issue where accounting packets are not showing up where expected all the time... in particula

[c-nsp] BGP peer groups / performance question

Hi folks.. Has anyone studied how much faster BGP peer groups are on very loaded routers? I have a customer that I'm doing work with currently that has about 300 BGP peers on a Sup720/7613 box. Downstream customers take about 10 minutes to receive a full routing table. I'm used to seeing

[c-nsp] Best Practice - Downstream BGP Customer - Advertising Point to Point

Hi there... I'm looking to see what best practice is or if folks do anything with /30's that are used to feed downstream BGP customers? What I mean specifically is that we have a downstream customer who is requesting that our end of the /30 is only visible when layer2 is established. The /30

Re: [c-nsp] BGP - Multihop across igp network

- From: Sascha E. Pollok [mailto:nsp-l...@pollok.net] Sent: April-06-10 12:34 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BGP - Multihop across igp network Hello Paul, > We have the capability to bring up iBGP on the 6500's which we might examine > (just never

Re: [c-nsp] BGP - Multihop across igp network

t participates in OSPF as well)? I'm thinking it would make more sense at the 3825 side? Cheers, and thanks again for making this more logical for me..;) Paul -Original Message- From: Sascha E. Pollok [mailto:nsp-l...@pollok.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 11:03 AM

[c-nsp] BGP - Multihop across igp network

Hi folks. I've run into a scenario and confused - this list is so helpful .. at the risk of sounding like a dummy here I'm posting anyways LOL We have two core BGP boxes (7600's). Everything is fine with them. Connected to these 7600's we have a pair of 6500's not doing BGP (however par

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Balancing

For inbound traffic our outbound traffic? Or both? MED's are not going to help here... Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Gotstein Sent: March-20-10 1:19 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] Long list of route-maps

Hmmm.. that's definitely strange. Have a pair of 7600's with 720-3BXL's in them doing similar (roughly 250 public peers per box, a few transit connections per box, dozen downstream customers per box rough) and even though the boxes are loaded down pretty good we don't see what you describe. Our CP

Re: [c-nsp] Long list of route-maps

Thanks... it's definitely not the issue described though ;) Can you share more on the platform itself? What supervisor, memory etc? -Original Message- From: Andy B. [mailto:globic...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 12:29 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nethe

Re: [c-nsp] Long list of route-maps

Why a route-map PER peer? Can you not group them under the same conditions and simplify things a bit? This may not be the problem sounds like something else possibly.. Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Beh

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 SVI Question

: Tim Stevenson [mailto:tstev...@cisco.com] Sent: February-22-10 8:12 PM To: Paul Stewart; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6500 SVI Question Hi Paul, The bandwidth does not affect the throughput etc and doesn't take into account the underlying L2 interfaces bandwidth. It str

[c-nsp] 6500 SVI Question

Hi there... Typically when we require higher bandwidth, we upgrade the interface to something larger ... recently though we were faced with having to do 2XGE on a LAG until our new 10GE ports arrive. The SVI interface shows a bandwidth of 1 Gig even though there are two physical GigE interface

Re: [c-nsp] Renumbering serial interfaces

Test this ahead of time with a lab box if you can ;) What I've done in this scenarios is to build the snippets of config I need to apply and put them into a plain text file. Then do a "copy tftp://blahblah/filename running-config" which merges the changes. Before I do the copy I do a "reload in

[c-nsp] LAG Problem Cisco/Juniper

Hey folks. I'm cross posting this so apologies if you are both lists. Trying to get a LAG group up between a Juniper EX4200 switch and a Cisco 7606 using a pair of GigE's - rush job etc.. can't get the group to come up and missing something obvious ;) Cisco: interface GigabitEthern

Re: [c-nsp] Card Throughput - 6148A-GE-TX

te Templin [mailto:peteli...@templin.org] Sent: January-31-10 9:06 AM To: Matt Buford Cc: Paul Stewart; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Card Throughput - 6148A-GE-TX Matt Buford wrote: > Each range of 8 ports (1-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48) has an ASIC. > Each ASIC c

[c-nsp] Card Throughput - 6148A-GE-TX

Hi there. We are aware of what the entire card is capable of (2 Gb/s), but is there any way to see how much is being utilized from within IOS itself? We can start counting up all the ports but is there an easier way? ;) Relating to this, is the card limited to 2Gb/s total or 1Gb/s per hal

[c-nsp] QOS - Multilink Question

Hey folks... I haven't run across this before so hoping someone can suggest a quick fix..;) Cisco 6500 - off this box feeding three T1's out to customer prem using multilink PPP. These are full rate T1: dis1-rtr-pt#sh interfaces Serial 5/0/2:21 Serial5/0/2:21 is up, line protocol is up

[c-nsp] Weird ARP Issue with 3rd party equipment

Hi folks.. We've had an ongoing issue for a while involving ARP timeouts - we're pretty confident it's a 3rd party hardware issue but wanted to solicit some feedback please... 2 X Cisco 3825 and a Cisco 1841 so far have been identified - all three of these routers have different software lo

Re: [c-nsp] Any good Cisco (or other vendor) appliances for application server DDoS prevention?

What about some of the smaller Juniper SRX stuff? Just getting ready to start using them and I understand they have some features in them for DOS related attacks - no first hand experience specific to DOS stuff yet, perhaps others on here can chime in or the IDP series possibly too..? Paul

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Version for 7206VXR

Good point.. we've been running 12.2(33)SRD1 on several 7206VXR's both G1 and G2 since March and been pretty solid ... YMMV... Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rob Shakir Sent: December-06-09 9:04 AM T

Re: [c-nsp] mlppp dot1q question

Thanks very much .. that gives me what I was looking for unfortunately ;) Paul -Original Message- From: Justin Shore [mailto:jus...@justinshore.com] Sent: November-26-09 10:57 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] mlppp dot1q question Paul Stewart

[c-nsp] mlppp dot1q question

Hey guys... Is there any way to run subinterfaces across a MLPPP bundle in IOS? thanks, Paul ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue

We noticed it after a new site had grown some in size if I recall .. hope that helps.. Paul -Original Message- From: D.J. O'Berry [mailto:dobe...@zcorum.com] Sent: October 23, 2009 1:47 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions i

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue

Did this start "out of the blue" or is this a new installation? We had something like this occurring for a while but only on our own DSLAM's. It ended up being a timing issue from the DSLAM manufacturer which I confirmed from others using the same gear (Occam). To work around this issue, we adju

Re: [c-nsp] sliding window quota

One of the best solutions in my opinion is Arbor (presuming I understood your reference to sliding window BW quotas) highly recommend their gear. Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kaegler, Mike Sent

Re: [c-nsp] Abnormal CPU usage on a G1 engine

One thing I noticed is your T train release - there are MD (think that's the new term) of software releases for the G1 engine. I'd suggest looking at a new IOS to see if that helps. Also, there could be several configuration items that are causing this can you post a sanitized config? Paul

Re: [c-nsp] Gut check needed - QoS

Hi Graham... That should work just fine... One minor thing to note by matching UDP port ranges.. any traffic (not just RTP) that hits those ranges will get priority .. typically not a big thing but worth mentioning. In my earlier posting, I was actually matching by the IP blocks where the softsw

Re: [c-nsp] QOS Problem - T1 Interface

match access-group 66 policy-map KGCC2 class KGCC-QOS priority 1000 1500 Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart Sent: September-17-09 1:36 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [

[c-nsp] QOS Problem - T1 Interface

Hi folks... I need a second set of eyes here...;) We have a customer fed off T1 to an Adtran router that is having problems with their voice quality... they also share this as their Internet connection. A ticket is open with Adtran to confirm their QOS settings but I'm hoping to clarify if

Re: [c-nsp] VPN Auditing

Thanks - didn't know about that ;) I think we'll end up moving to Radius anyways - just makes better sense Take care, Paul -Original Message- From: John Kougoulos [mailto:k...@intracom.gr] Sent: August-31-09 9:30 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subje

[c-nsp] VPN Auditing

Hi folks... We have a site that runs a Cisco 2800 with a IOS VPN server. Users connect via their Cisco VPN clients to gain access to an internal network there... I would like to start auditing it a bit more and have a way to tell who logged in and when. Is this difficult? I've searched a

Re: [c-nsp] C7206VXR boot issue

For sure... bootloaders are one of those things I don't like to touch until I have to... it's been so long since I had to upgrade the bootloader on anything we have that I'd have to read the docs again to remember how..;) Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [

Re: [c-nsp] SSH no longer functions after hostname change

Normally all we do is a "crypto key gen rsa" if a hostname changes and we continue on... this regens the keys and stops/starts the SSH process Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jon Wolberg Sent: Mo

Re: [c-nsp] SSH no longer functions after hostname change

on Wolberg Systems Engineer Virtacore Systems Inc. "We Virtualize IT!" - Original Message - From: "Paul Stewart" To: "Jon Wolberg" , cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 12:17:14 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: RE: [c-nsp] SSH n

[c-nsp] 7206VXR BGP Sessions

Hi there. I need to move several hundred BGP sessions (low traffic peers, about 500 Mb/s combined) over to another box - have a 7206VXR with NPE1G and a 7206VXR with NPE2G sitting spare at moment. How many sessions/traffic should the 1G and the 2G be able to handle approximately? Than

[c-nsp] Power Upgrade 7600

Hey folks.. Does anyone know how the 7600 chassis (7606) handles power inbalance? To explain a bit more, we have a pair of 2700Watt DC power supplies in a 7606 that needs to be upgraded soon. To avoid downtime, we are looking at upgrading one side and then the other. They are running redunda

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Best Online Antispam Service

Yeah, Postini is what we use today... been very good to date. Service Provider pricing you can get them much more aggressive in pricing depending on volume. I believe we're doing about 35,000 mailboxes today with them - overall pretty happy. Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 vs RSP720 - Difference?

Hey there... Between the two 7206's in question, we have about 280 BGP peers configured split about 60/40 between them ;) Paul -Original Message- From: Rick Ernst [mailto:r...@woofpaws.com] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 12:32 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Su

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 vs RSP720 - Difference?

I'm not sure about performance numbers but biggest thing I can see is support for 4GB RAM - for us, this is becoming an issue with BGP tables chewing up 60% of our memory today in 3BXL's. I miss the PRP2 platform for BGP now... thinking of moving back to GSR's in the near future on PRP3's Paul

Re: [c-nsp] L2TPv3 and VLANs

@cisco.com] Sent: June 18, 2009 10:32 PM To: Ge Moua Cc: Paul Stewart; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L2TPv3 and VLANs Hi Ge, On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Ge Moua wrote: [snip] > I haven't done this yet but one can adjust max segment size on end-station > hosts to somethin

Re: [c-nsp] L2TPv3 and VLANs

nal Message- From: Ge Moua [mailto:moua0...@umn.edu] Sent: June 18, 2009 11:33 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: 'Ziv Leyes'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L2TPv3 and VLANs Yep, ran into that to; on the upstream layer-3 hop from hosts do something like "tcp-mss adjust 1

Re: [c-nsp] L2TPv3 and VLANs

How did you deal with MTU issues from l2tpv3? In our testing we would see packets drop instead of fragmenting where they should... I've been meaning to followup on this as we have some great l2tpv3 deployments waiting in the wings... Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE blade questions

Thanks folks.. I figured the 720 upgrade would come along as part of this..;) Cheers, Paul From: Tim Stevenson [mailto:tstev...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:51 PM To: Gert Doering; Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE blade questions

[c-nsp] 10GE blade questions

We have a 6509 sup2/msfc2 switch which only does layer2 services - is there 10GE options available for this platform? The WS-X6708-10G-3CXL blades are also of interest for Sup720 platform - if they are only doing VLAN trunks out to remote switches and any routing would be done on SVI interface

[c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

Hi there. We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they have a new deployment currently going into an MDU (condos). They have asked for a recommended switch that is "IPTV friendly" - I'm presuming they mean multicast aware etc. Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff appr

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?

Occam... ;) -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Juan C. Crespo R. Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:34 AM To: Cisco Post NSP Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ? Guys Does anyone of you

Re: [c-nsp] "sh run" crashes router

What are some of the versions you are running? We have some 1710/1711 routers and many 2621 in the field and have never experienced that particular issue.. Agree with eninja though - always IOS bug 95% of the time anyways...;) Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Advertising - Question re more specific block

rom: Stephen Kratzer [mailto:kratz...@pa.net] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 10:39 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Paul Stewart Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP Advertising - Question re more specific block If the provider to which you are advertising a /22 is well-connected, I would suggest determining what comm

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 router and Etherchannel across multiple line card

Apologies for bumping the post My notes show the following: WS-X6148A-GE-TX *Number of ports: 48 Number of port groups: 6 Port ranges per port group: 1-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48 *The aggregate bandwidth of each port group is 1 Gbps. WS-X6148-GE-TX *Number of ports: 48 Number

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 router and Etherchannel across multiple line card

You may wish to clarify the 1Gb/s limit however on the 6148A unless I am mistaken. Yes, 1 Gig per ASIC but doesn't the 6148A have one ASIC per 8 ports or am I thinking of a different card? Thank you for the clarification... Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Advertising - Question re more specific block

om peering points of course). Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Bertrand [mailto:st...@ibctech.ca] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:02 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP Advertising - Question re more specific block * PGP - S/MIME Si

[c-nsp] BGP Advertising - Question re more specific block

Hi folks. I'd like to know if there's a better way to approach this. We are advertising a specific /22 that belongs to a /18 block via one specific upstream BGP connection. The /18 is advertised to all upstreams, the /22 is only advertised to one upstream as a method of influencing traffic

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 Errors - Revisited

errors and found it to be in software somewhere but it doesn't look like my luck is going to get that good ;) Take care, Paul From: Ibrahim Abo Zaid [mailto:ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com] Sent: May 9, 2009 9:13 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp

[c-nsp] Sup720 Errors - Revisited

Hi folks. I posted about this before and was told it was either bad memory or bad sup cards.. Have a pair of 7606's with sup720-3bxl . these errors occur on one system and not the other. To top it off, we got these same errors showing up a couple of times now on 6509 with sup2/msfc2 recently..

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit

I would tend to agree - ASR series from Cisco would be next upgrade, at least that's where we're headed at some point I think To answer your original question though, we've found on the 7206VXR-NPE2G that we'll run out of CPU long before IDB's. Here's a box running at average of 30% CPU at an

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C2950G-24-EI memory upgrade

age- From: Jason Link [mailto:jason.l...@whgroup.com] Sent: April 26, 2009 12:17 PM To: Paul Stewart; Cisco-nsp Subject: RE: [c-nsp] WS-C2950G-24-EI memory upgrade This might be a silly question, but are you certain you only have 8MB ram? Everything I see online shows that switch to have 16MB. I d

  1   2   3   4   >