Re: [c-nsp] IP Address management software

Hi Gary, you can try this http://www.brownkid.net/NorthStar/ cheers, -- Peter Nyamukusa Technical Manager Africa Online (T) Ltd. Tel: +255 (22) 211 6090 Fax:+255 (22) 211 6089 Email: peter.nyamuk...@africaonline.co.tz A member of the Telkom South Africa Group - Original

Re: [c-nsp] Recommend IOS for 7200?

Hi Howard, Why do you have a look at the Software Advisor tool http://tools.cisco.com/Support/Fusion/FusionHome.do cheers ___ Peter Nyamukusa - CCIP, JNCIS, MCSE, Linux+ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [c-nsp] BGP over Etherchannel Issue

Are you peering with interface IPs or Loopback IPs? Regards, Peter Nyamukusa - CCIP, JNCIS, MCSE, Linux+ Technical Manager Africa Online (T) Ltd Tel: +255 (22) 211 6090 Fax: +255 (22) 211 6089 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: petenya A member of the Telkom South Africa Group -Original Message

Re: [c-nsp] Converting OSPF backbone to iBGP

hardware (memory) on the ones which have routers is an additional expense. So my plan is to Run IGP as my Core Backbone IGP and let the customers choose their PE to CE routing protocol Just my side of the coin considering the environment I am in Cheers, ___ Peter

Re: [c-nsp] Strange PIX interface problem

Hi William, It looks like the 'interface ethernet1 auto' command has solved the problem Many thanks for the effort Cheers Peter -Original Message- From: William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:50 PM To: Peter Nyamukusa Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n

Re: [c-nsp] Strange PIX interface problem

rnet1 auto shutdown Usage: interface [ [shutdown]] [no] interface [logical|physical] [shutdown] interface change-vlan show interface pixfirewall(config)# -Original Message- From: William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:50 PM To: Peter Ny

Re: [c-nsp] Strange PIX interface problem

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:39 PM To: Peter Nyamukusa Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Strange PIX interface problem Peter can you include a 'show run' ? On 25/02/2008, Peter Nyamukusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi fo

[c-nsp] Strange PIX interface problem

Hi folks, I just reset a Pix 515E to factory default using the command "wr erase". I am now trying to reconfigure it again and it looks like everything is working fine except the interfaces I cannot seem to bring them up When I type the command interface Ethernet 1 form the config prompt its simp

Re: [c-nsp] OT: How do you fight spam in your enterprise? I need help

les. We are also in the process of deploying an Ironport at some of the major internet exchange points as our primary MX like LINX and SAIX. One thing to note about the Ironport appliance is that its is expensive compared to most spam filtering solutions. HTH Cheers

Re: [c-nsp] RE. Cisco 3750 Rate limit

tion drop You can try to shape the traffic to 50Mb rather than policing or you can reclassify the exceeding traffic instead of dropping it then shape it. Cheers, Peter Nyamukusa MCSE, MCSA:messaging, MCSA, MCP, CCIP, CCNA, A+, JNCIA, JNCIS Technical Manag

Re: [c-nsp] Filtered BGP routes

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Faubel > Sent: 14 December 2007 10:52 PM > To: Peter Rathlev; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Filtered BGP routes > > Maybe I am asking the question in the wrong way.

[c-nsp] Software Advisor Error

t.java(Compiled Code)) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java(Compiled Code)) ----- Peter Nyamukusa MCSE, MCSA:messaging, MCSA, MCP, CCIP, CCNA, A+, JNCIA, JNCIS Technical Manager Africa Online Swaziland Tel:  +268 404 4705 Cell: +26

Re: [c-nsp] BGP neighbors & load

12.3(15b). Each neighbor would receive a default route > from As long as your only receiving default routes then BGP will not take up too much resources I am sure this should be manageable Unlike the full internet feed which is over 200K of routes Cheers Peter Nyamukusa - MCSE, CCIP, A+, JN

Re: [c-nsp] BGP and IGP

is best practice on this much > > appreciated. If you intend on being a transit network I would recommend running BGP on all your routers and an IGP to carry your loopback IPs, this is a more scalable solution Regards Peter Nyamukusa CCIP, JNCIS-ER, MCSE > &

Re: [c-nsp] Inbound redundancy with two ISPs

Hi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Father > Sent: 01 November 2007 02:45 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] Inbound redundancy with two ISPs > > One of our customers is looking to us to provide a fai

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 1721 with WIC-1ENET -> dot1q

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thierry De Vriendt > Sent: 25 October 2007 12:33 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 1721 with WIC-1ENET -> dot1q > > Hello *, > > > > I have a Cisco 1721 with a W

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber issue, banging my head.

Hi, What type of Media converters are you using? What speed are they running at? Have you tried to use different media converters? I have ran into something similar to this it started all of a sudden I used to get input and CRC errors on my 7206 router, the fibre was terminating on a 2950 switch.

[c-nsp] Distributed Director functionality

Hi folks, I am trying to run the Distributed Director functionality on a 2610 router with 8 MB flash according to the software requirements below I would need IOS 12.2 (1) or higher with Plus feature-set. I downloaded 12.2 but unfortunately the min requirements for running this are 16MB of flash.

[c-nsp] static Nat on Non Standard TCP port on PIX 506

Hi guys, I am trying to allow external access to an oracle web server sitting on a private IP behind a PIX 506 The public ip is 2.2.2.2 and the private IP of the server is 192.168.1.5 and the application is running on port 7778 I am access the server from a source ip 10.1.1.2 but its not working

Re: [c-nsp] Debug redistribute

Hi Rick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Rick > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 11:55 PM > To: c-nsp > Subject: [c-nsp] Debug redistribute > > Is there an equivalent command for debugging redistribution from one > OSPF process to

[c-nsp] OSPF Interface problem

Hi Guys, I am running ospf as my IGP and on my access server which is running IOS image c5300-jk9s-mz.123-12a.bin. I have disabled all interfaces from participating in ospf routing except my fast Ethernet yet when I check the ospf process it show that all the interfaces are participating in

Re: [c-nsp] BD9 - DB15 Pin-out

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Nyamukusa > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:36 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] BD9 - DB15 Pin-out > > Hi Folks, > > > &

[c-nsp] BD9 - DB15 Pin-out

Hi Folks, Can anyone point me in the right direction where I could get the pin-out for a DB9 to DB15 Cable Thanks in advance Peter ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp ar

[c-nsp] Channelized E1/PRI Problem

Hi Folks, I have just installed a Channelized E1/PRI card on my 3725 router and I am getting a local alarm from the E1 card could it be possible that the Chassis is not compatible to the card. I have pasted the show version & show controllers from my router, any help is appreciated in pointing

Re: [c-nsp] Access-list Question

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 5:37 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] Access-list Question > > Ok... I know I had a rough weekend but I don't get this.. > >

Re: [c-nsp] bgp and update-source

Hi It would take the physical IP but also remember it would take the primary IP address on the interface just incase you have any secondary IPs Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gernot Nusshall Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:09 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] BGP received-routes

Hi Dimitry, I looks like those routes are originating via your IGP which has a lower AD than IBGP. In this case do so ip route XX.XX.XX.0/22 to see how that route is being learnt and injected into the routing table. Regards, Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM