[c-nsp] SIP-2XGE-V2 Question

I can't use a Copper SFP and set the speed to 100.I'm looking at the SPA-2XGE-V2 but I can't find anywhere if the RJ45 ports are 10/100/1000 or just 1000. Does anyone have a 7600 with a SPA-2XGE-V2 that can verify that you can lock it to 100M? -Richey _

Re: [c-nsp] Private IP in point to point link on internet

If you have Adtran CPE on the far end of your links they will also support /31s as well. - Richey On 6/24/16, 2:00 PM, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Nick Cutting" wrote: >Good move > >Only the two devices need to support it > >ASA will not, Cisco IOS/XR/XE will > >

Re: [c-nsp] Looping up far end smartjack

I just thought about that for a second.. If the T1 is down then the router will be down as well. In the event of a power outage I still can't tell if the power is off or the T1 is down.If I can hit the smart jack and not the router then I could assume it's a power outage.

Re: [c-nsp] Looping up far end smartjack

Will the card respond to loop codes even if the router is in ronmon? Richey From: Adam Korab [mailto:adam.ko...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:01 PM To: Richey Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Looping up far end smartjack On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:17 AM

Re: [c-nsp] Looping up far end smartjack

I was hoping to avoid having to go to the colo late at night. We did finally hear from the customer. A breaker had tripped and they person on duty had no idea where the breakers were in the building. Richey -Original Message- From: joe mcguckin [mailto:j...@via.net] Sent: Thursday

[c-nsp] Looping up far end smartjack

not. In a brilliant move the customer's primary and secondary contact numbers are numbers on the circuit so no one can call to verify that they have power at their site. Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.net

Re: [c-nsp] Console problems

from the router but I could not send anything to it. The LEDs on the device indicated that I was transmitting and receiving. I guess LEDs come before whatever component broke. Richey From: Anh Khoa Le Viet [mailto:lvak...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 12:22 PM To: Richey Cc

[c-nsp] Console problems

onsole session going with it. Does anyone have any ideas on this one? Everything I am googleing relates to the router crashing or hanging which this one does not seem to do. Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https:

Re: [c-nsp] 6 T1s in a 2851

Thanks, That's what I am looking for. Richey -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 6:49 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6 T1s in a 2851

[c-nsp] 6 T1s in a 2851

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5854/prod_qas0900aecd80 169bd6.html Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Will this work?

MLPPP Bundles and some basic QOS. The only ACLs in the box would be to protect the box it's self and the occasional SMTP block for a user that won't clean up their network. I am basically trying to merge two non VXR 7206s with NPE-150s into one

[c-nsp] Smartnet pricing?

he image. They were quoted over $25k just to upgrade an image. The part that sounds fishy is being forced to pay for 5 years of smartnet. Does this sound right? Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/ma

Re: [c-nsp] Metro E best practices

uff I didn't know before. Richey -Original Message- From: Steve Bertrand [mailto:st...@ibctech.ca] Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 7:51 PM To: Richey Cc: Cisco-NSP Mailing List Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Metro E best practices Richey, I am very sorry. My response is not typical of my norm

Re: [c-nsp] Metro E best practices

t take rocket science to figure out if a provider is using the LEC as their Metro E transport. Richey -Original Message- From: Steve Bertrand [mailto:st...@ibctech.ca] Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:45 PM To: Richey Cc: 'Cisco Mailing list' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Metro E b

[c-nsp] Metro E best practices

k to. I have some 3660s and 7206s that are doing nothing and thought one of the two would make a decent router to start with. Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-

[c-nsp] "sh run" crashes router

are running various versions of the same image type.The only thing that they all have in common is that it's been months since anyone has logged into the router. Is this some bug that comes from long uptimes without any activity at the CLI? Richey __

[c-nsp] T3 fixed when cables are reseated..

cable. I went back checked the T3 and all of the T1s were backup.Has anyone had this happen before? I can't find any clues as to what happened. My only guess is that the far end is looped when I unplug the cables and it may reset the far end.

[c-nsp] 7206vxr npe300 throughput

Mb FE feed. Should I worry about this router being able to handle 80 to 100mb of traffic? Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer..

Couldn't resist. 4. Do you think it is important that all mailing list members should be informed of your absence via an auto responder when you take a day off? Richey -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol Sent: Friday, Ju

Re: [c-nsp] Giving customers access to your gear.

Thanks for the replies. I am getting the feeling that after talking to our sales guy who is dealing with them that they want to second guess everything I am doing because we are a small ISP and not the big billion dollar a year ISP of their choice. Richey -Original Message- From: Eric

[c-nsp] Giving customers access to your gear.

. They say that Verizion and AT&T don't have any problems giving them this kind of access to their gear. Any thoughts from the group? Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] access-list speed limiting.

ddition to: access-list 150 permit ip host x.x.10.71 any Now the bandwidth hogs are at the 3Mb they are paying for and the sales guys have stopped knocking on my door. Thanks for the help Richey -Original Message- From: Mike Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008

Re: [c-nsp] access-list speed limiting.

. Richey -Original Message- From: Mike Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 11:52 PM To: Richey Subject: RE: [c-nsp] access-list speed limiting. Looks like you are limiting in the upstream direction..are u trying to rate limit their downloads or uploads or both

[c-nsp] access-list speed limiting.

ion drop access-list 150 permit ip host x.x.10.71 any I've also tried the following: interface FastEthernet0/1.103 description DA1-SM2 Link encapsulation dot1Q 103 ip address x.x.34.193 255.255.255.248 ip access-group 102 out traffic-shape group 155 300 75000

[c-nsp] Pix Image upgrade

o you have to re-register the firewall's licenses? This box is past it's EOL so I don't want to end up with a box that is useless. Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/

[c-nsp] DSL Multi Link

a DS3 BBG Circuit from AT&T(BellSouth). Can someone point me in the right direction or is it even possible with the BBG Circuit? Thanks, Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/list

[c-nsp] access-list question

If I do the following will it rate-limit each IP to 1.8Mb or will it limit the group of IPs to 1.8Mb? I want for each IP to get 1.8Mb. interface Ethernet1/1 description EB1 - Wireless ip address 69.18.x.x 255.255.255.224 rate-limit input access-group 199 180 337500 675000 conform-

Re: [c-nsp] multilink bundle

So curiosity has me. Why bundle 23 T1s? Richey -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 8:41 PM To: Joseph Jackson Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] multilink bundle On Tue, 4 Dec

Re: [c-nsp] 3660 Hot Swap?

No. I needed a 100Mb card for another router and that one was never used. Heh I put a label on the blank plate that says to reboot the router before inserting a card in that slot just in case I forget about that a year from now. :) Richey -Original Message- From: Paul Stewart [mailto

Re: [c-nsp] 3660 Hot Swap?

I found that and another document after I found out that it's called OIR and not just Hot Swap. Heh. I can verify that the 3660 does not pitch a fit when you pull a NM-1FE-TX out of it. Richey -Original Message- From: Christophe Fillot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, Nov

[c-nsp] 3660 Hot Swap?

I just wanted a second opinion, maybe a 3rd or 4th :) Is it safe to pull a NM-1FE-TX out of a running 3660? If I am reading correctly the cisco site says yes, but it would be nice to hear someone say they have done it before. Richey ___ cisco

[c-nsp] Advice on Terminating T1s

twork. Any suggestions on what to start looking at? At what point would you stop using multiple 7200s and go to a bigger box? Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archi

[c-nsp] NM-HDV with 1MFT-T1.

this card be used to hand the circuit to the customers PBX? I was going to use a 3600 with this card and 2W with 2 T1 CSU/DSU Cards for this location. Is this a decent way to do this or is there a better way? Richey ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Hot Swaping 7206 Power Supplies

ed. I couldn't tell anymore than the green leds were lit up on them. Richey -Original Message- From: Jon Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 7:59 AM To: Richey Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Hot Swaping 7206 Power Supplies On Tue, 5 Jun 20

[c-nsp] Hot Swaping 7206 Power Supplies

wap the power supply in the non VXR 7200s? -Richey ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] BGP Propigation

ondering how long I should wait before I should gripe. I was given the /24 a week ago and it's still not useable today. I opened a ticket at the end of last week and it's still not working. Before I start pestering everyone I want to make sure I am not

Re: [c-nsp] Sub Interfaces on 3660

hate sales. Richey -Original Message- From: Church, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:03 PM To: Richey; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Sub Interfaces on 3660 Can the radio do ISL encapsulation? Seems like it'd be unlikely, since Ci

Re: [c-nsp] Sub Interfaces on 3660

I have tried this with FA0/1 numbered and unnumbered. I get the same result for any sub interface, though I can ping 10.1.1.1 if that IP bound to FA0/1 -Richey -Original Message- From: Burton Windle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:52 PM To: Richey Subject

[c-nsp] Sub Interfaces on 3660

dress 10.100.100.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet0/1.101 encapsulation isl 101 ip address 10.100.101.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet0/1.102 encapsulation isl 101 ip address 10.100.102.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! Thanks -R