http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute_bgp/configuration/guide/irg_
remove_as_ps10592_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
neighbor {ip-address | peer-group-name} remove-private-as [all
[replace-as]]
Robert Crowe
Email: rocr...@cisco.com
-Original Message-
From:
First two things that come to mind are to:
1. Change the new core AS number
2. Look into CsC
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:50 PM
To: Oliver Boehmer
, 2011 4:36 PM
To: Robert Crowe (rocrowe)
Cc: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Label propagation and/or
MP-BGPand/orroute-reflecting, oh my.
On 2011-01-21, at 4:22 PM, Robert Crowe (rocrowe) wrote:
First two things that come to mind are to:
1. Change
Unfortunatly CsC requires EBGP+label or IGP+label. No IBGP support
-Sent from my Droid-
Robert Crowe
Solutions Architect
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lixfeld [ja...@lixfeld.ca]
Received: Friday, 21 Jan 2011, 4:48pm
To: Robert Crowe (rocrowe) [rocr...@cisco.com]
CC: Oliver Boehmer
1. Tune your IGP to your desired level of convergence (SPF timers, etc).
2. Use BFD with your IGP
3. Use LDP IGP-Sync or LDP Session Protection.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michael Robson
Sent:
7:05 PM
To: Robert Crowe (rocrowe)
Cc: Mack O'Brian; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF design
Just remember
that you cannot summarize (today) your main Loopback used for your
LDP/BGP ID as there needs to be a full LSP from ingress-to-egress PE
across areas, if you providing
You can summarize at ABR's, just don't summarize your main
Loopback/LDP-ID/BGP-ID range.
Robert Crowe
Email: rocr...@cisco.com
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rin
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:25 AM
To:
services.
Robert Crowe
Email: rocr...@cisco.com
From: Mack O'Brian [mailto:mackobria...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 11:39 AM
To: Robert Crowe (rocrowe)
Cc: Rin; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF design
So what is main reason of carrying MPLS all the way
Many ways, simple to complex:
1. Static routes - route specific destinations down the TE tunnel
2. Autoroute - let the IGP SPF compute paths down the TE tunnel (headend local)
3. Forwarding Adjacency - injects the TE tunnel into the IGP
4. CBTS/PBTS - forward specific EXP values down the TE
The main benefit of having a different RD per VRF per PE is for IBGP multipath
in the core. If you don't need or ever foresee using/benefiting from multipath,
then you can use the same RD for a given VRF on all PE's.
Thanks,
Solutions Architect
SP Mobility Advanced Services
CCIE RS
Cisco
10 matches
Mail list logo
