of 100
-Aaron
On 7/11/2024 9:49 AM, Arne Larsen via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hi all
I hope that someone can clarify something for me, that I don’t
understand.
In the scope of replacing a route reflector in our network, we have 2,
there has been deployed a route-map on the peer clients vpnv4
Are you running BFD on the link as well?
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 8:33 AM Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Can you point me towards a hint on how you implement import/export filters
> in OSPF on IOS XR?
>
> Are you referring to 'distribute lists'?
>
> Another thing t
https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html
nice website to check port mix capabilities.
-Aaron
On 2/22/2023 5:06 PM, Thomas Scott via cisco-nsp wrote:
Yes - 400 Gbps throughput total If I recall correctly.
The MX204 has four rate-selectable ports that can be configured as
100
i think the problem is they let the good ones go.
On Wednesday, February 8, 2023, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/8/23 10:23, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote:
>
> Working would be much more pleasurable if half the
>> world's white collar workers wouldn't be u
netconf?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:03 PM Sander Steffann via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the best/most efficient/most convenient way to push large prefix
> lists or sets to an XR router for BGP prefix filtering? Pushing thousands
> of lines through the CLI seems
few sources on the internet that I trust for time. It depends
on your level of comfort.
Aaron
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:43 PM harbor235 via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> I hear what your saying but NTP is an active attack vector, I don't trust
> outside resourc
Are the sessions that bounced hashed to use the failed/turned off link?
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 12:07 PM Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> I have 4 individual links defined as part of a Bundle-ether (IOS-XR
> 5.3.3 on ASR9010):
>
> interface TenGigE0/2/0/1
> bundle id 2 mode active
> flow-control bid
I typically use 3 external as servers and then have the core peer with
themselves. I don't think that will help in this case but it does seem like
something is borked.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:42 AM Lukas Tribus wrote:
> I don't think you will get anywhere without actually capturing the
> entir
+1 overload bit.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:58 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Can someone help me out here? I'm trying to find a way to delay the
> > propagation of a loopback interface in isis.
> >
> > The problem is the border node in sd-access, which uses the loopback
> > interface for Lisp,
r wrote:
> >
> >> Ya I tried that too, it still tries to find the wrong ios file and
> start's
> >> its loop again. This one might be a brick.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:15 PM Aaron wrote:
> >>
> >> > Try this
&g
Try this
https://packetlife.net/blog/2010/oct/11/recovering-no-service-password-recovery-service/
On Thursday, December 3, 2020, Aaron wrote:
> Looks like you need to talk to TAC. The password recovery being disabled
> is not your friend.
>
> https://community.cisco.com/t5/rou
Looks like you need to talk to TAC. The password recovery being disabled is
not your friend.
https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/asr-920-boot-fail/td-p/3834996
On Thursday, December 3, 2020, Scott Miller wrote:
> The output didn't seem to format well, let's try it again:
>
> System Bootstra
This isn't at typo is it?
aaa authentication login default group TACACS line!
should it be
aaa authentication login default group TACACS line <<< no !
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:13 PM Eric Van Tol wrote:
> No, all I have is:
>
> control-plane
> management-plane
> inband
>interface TenGig
6.6.x should work too. After that I think everything else is the 64bit.
What is everyones opinion of the 64bit XR?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:37 PM wrote:
> Never ends :)
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisc
You didn't specify the platform or code version it is running. Would help
with platform specifics
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 11:47 AM wrote:
> I wonder if bgp neighboring isn't timing out quickly enough for your
> satisfaction and holding routes for a few minutes
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
you could deduce if it is a line card or by adding 1 line card at a time.
On Wednesday, September 30, 2020, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Aaron wrote on 30/09/2020 20:11:
>
>> He is suggesting reseating all cards. Starting with the Supervisor.
>>
>
> correct. power down the b
You may need to ask TAC. Unfortunately I do not know.
He is suggesting reseating all cards. Starting with the Supervisor.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:14 AM Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 30.09.2020 19:03, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> > Eugene Grosbein wrote on 30/09/2020 05:14:
> >> Yesterday I've created
sharp increase recently (weekly, daily, hourly). I'd be more concerned
with daily and hourly (or less).
How frequently do you see them and what is the amount?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:41 AM Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 29.09.2020 18:56, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> > Eugene Grosbein wrote on 29/09/202
Unfortunately no.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:50 AM Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 28.09.2020 17:12, James Bensley wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:35, Eugene Grosbein
> wrote:
> >> One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses
> only two,
> >> one for IP uplink and another
CPP is the other issue.
ex
control-plane
management-plane
inband
interface hundred-gige0/1/1
allow SSH
allow blah
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:51 PM Ted Pelas Johansson
wrote:
> Regarding isis, it looks like you have MTU mismatch since you configured
> 1600 byte on both platforms.
>
>
;t always mean 10 gig
>
> set interfaces xe-0/1/4 gigether-options speed 1g
>
> agould@dallas-204-1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 | grep speed
> Link-level type: Flexible-Ethernet, MTU: 9216, MRU: 9224, LAN-PHY mode,
> Speed: 10Gbps, BPDU Error: None,
> Speed Configuration: 1G
Good Morning Drew,
They are TenGigabitethernet Interfaces:
PortNameStatus VlanDuplex Speed Type
Te10/0/44 connected xxx a-full a-1000
100/1000/2.5G/5G/10GBaseTX
Have a good day,
Aaron
Aaron Childs Director
Infrastructure Services
use ipv6
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020, harbor235 wrote:
> How are you IP'ng your connector networks between core and distribution?
> Public space or private? I do not like the potential overlap with
> management networks and I cannot DNS mike connector networks making my
> traceroutes look pr
aver
> Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 1:58 PM
> To: 'Aaron'
> Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading NXOS
>
> Howdy and thanks for replying.
>
> So the switch is running 7.0(3)I1(3)
> According to docs:
>
> Upgrad
Check to see if you have to upgrade to an intermediate version first. There
was an issue that would brick the switch if you tried to go straight to the
latest version.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:54 AM Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Current version: 7.0(3)I1(3)
>
> Upgrading a 9508:
>
> Checked fo
x code or any related feedback.
Thanks in advance,
Aaron
1. https://tmgmatrix.cisco.com/?npid=193
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Absolutely. Make sure to add enough overhead, 25%, so you do not keep
getting warning messages in the logs.
These are the defaults for XR
To prevent a peer from flooding BGP with advertisements, a limit is
placed on the number of prefixes that are accepted from a peer for
each supported address fa
I'm gonna hate when Flash is EOL. We have servers that use that GUI thing.
I agree, I hate it too.
I don't want to throw out a decent server just because flash no longer
works. I hope Adobe don't have a programmed kill switch.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:21 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 21/Jul/20
ethernet console should be on the list.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:01 PM joe mcguckin wrote:
> We don’t buy anything that can’t be managed with a serial connection. That
> means no fancy web based guis. Licensing is in the same category… A piece
> of equipment has to do something extraordinary be
Ive done FRR with success.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 8:20 AM emmanuel manoni
wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> I'm trying to deploy MPLS TE tunnel protection method with as minimal
> switchover time as possible, which one between TE FRR and Path Option
> should I choose and why?If I deploy both of them,wha
I believe the OP was about interop between cisco and juniper using
key-chains.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:56 AM Phil Bedard wrote:
> There shouldn't be an issue using keychains for these functions, I have XR
> and XE devices running IS-IS between each other with keychains on both
> without an issu
eXR is Linux based 64 bit vs classic XR which is the 32 bit qnx kernel.
Some releases have both
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Slightly unrelated to this thread but also sort of related.
>
> Did anyone else notice that this file appears in the ASR9001 IOS XR file
> list now?
>
Thanks James for the confirmation as that's precisely what I'm seeing.
Would be nice to see a link to a cisco document or someone out there online
that speaks to this
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: James Jun [mailto:ja...@towardex.com]
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 3:26 PM
thermore, I think since I have that ldp config in my PE's, I have LFIB
"Unlabelled" entries in my PE, I guess since I have no LDP config in the
transit P nodes. But in XE since I can remove that ldp config I no longer
have Unlabelled lfib entries and a nice clean lfib
arning'
condition 'Internal invalid parameter found.' : fib_mgr : (PID=4352) :
-Traceback= 5f9054 5fb5d8 605062 6fe214 538d69 565efc 567d65 688000 68a
9fc 68adf8 43c59a 7f6122(TRUNCATED)
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisc
have you looked at the ncs software/docs
On Saturday, April 18, 2020, Curtis Piehler wrote:
> Is there any good documentation online of upgrading the software on the
> ONS15454 platform? (MSPP, not MSTP). I know this platform is way end of
> life but unfortunately optical MUX's will just run u
F stamp of approval
-Professional - like MEF-CECP, etc, people can get career certifications
I recall they started with MEF, then MEF 2.0, now MEF 3.0
https://www.mef.net/certification/mef-certification-programs
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.neth
Perhaps that, and also, I think they may be substituting that term "mef" for
"ce" more recently. perhaps to imply that its capabilities are now
beyond the "metro" and extend into "carrier" space and beyond. Trying to
make some educated guesses/recol
I'm sure there is a 2511 somewhere that beats all of these.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:35 PM wrote:
> >> cisco LS1010 (R4600) processor with 65536K bytes of memory.
> >
> > It was just matter of time until someone shows up with LS1010 :)
> >
> > (Un)fortunately our LS1010s are long gone but the u
Oh my gosh a friggin lightstream 1010 up almost 17 years! That's about as
long as atm has been dead. Lol
You gotta tell me for reals if you still have cells going through that box ?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Ha, wow, Sascha holds first place !
...uptime is 14 years, 48 weeks, 4 days, 22 hours, 18 minutes
My gosh, up since 2005 !
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Non-believers I say, non-believers, lol
Jk, thanks, hey could be a bug, doubt it though
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco
What, and have to reset that uptime counter, never! Lol
Dude it's bridging eth frames just fine, why would i
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Holy cow! Beat that
dsw2-4503#sh ver | in uptime
dsw2-4503 uptime is 11 years, 2 weeks, 1 day, 23 hours, 3 minutes
dsw2-4503#sh ver | in IOS
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500-IPBASEK9-M),
Version 12.2(31)SGA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
-Aaron
.1 17 0 123 ?
Total number of prefixes 1
r2#
r2#sh ip ro bgp
10.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B 10.0.2.1 [20/17] via 1.2.3.1, 09:40:38
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https:/
Thanks y'all
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
1.2.3.1 UP21 r2.01
r1 L2 Fa0/0 1.2.3.1 UP22 r2.01
r2#
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.
Ah, and don't forget "additive" as it was crucial in not removing an rt, but
rather, adding another rt to the already present rt.
A nice way of having multiple extend community attributes (rt's) to be able
to match on.
-Aaron
_
vrf's, I'm pretty sure I had
to use an auto-export command in juniper to allow that local route sharing.
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Btw, good job, and thanks Jürgen for the informative and detailed
instruction on XR upgrade.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Aaron Gould
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 10:23 AM
To: c...@marenda.net; cisco-nsp
You just gave me another reason to like Juniper :|
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
It got jumbled ... I'll try again...
admin install add disk1:asr9k-mgbl-px.pie-4.3.4
disk1:asr9k-mpls-px.pie-4.3.4 disk1:asr9k-mini-px.pie-4.3.4
disk1:asr9k-fpd-px.pie-4.3.4 synchronous
admin install activate disk0:asr9k-mgbl-px-4.3.4 disk0:asr9k-mpls-px-4.3.4
disk0:asr9k-mini-px-4.3.4 disk0:asr
with tftp, so I simply ftp the files into disk1 and executed
install from that location
I had issues with a clock and also fpd, simply set the clock to something
like 2009 and add that fpd pie. That's what I did, worked.
- Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mail
clean the fiber.
On Thursday, September 5, 2019, Sheremet Roman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yep we change card to brand new and update our IOS, now looks best
> now:
>
> ASR1002#sh platform | in 10G
> 0/3 SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 ok1w0d
>
> But we have one more problem, media error
..@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > Jared Mauch
> > Sent: lunedì 26 agosto 2019 15:10
> > To: Aaron
> > Cc: Gert Doering; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 and EEM:Mandatory.dualrate_eem.tcl
> >
> > I’ll say this in public (now) - C
Any unexpected config change should be an automatic tac case.
Totally unexpected. Reminds me of the days when swapping a flash card on a
gsr could crash it.
This is a new one .
On Monday, August 26, 2019, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know what "EEM:Mandatory.dualrate_eem.tcl" is?
>
We have lots of zyxel's and manage all them with their public address. Why
don't you just do that?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 3:14 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subje
The XML requirement doesn't sound odd since this is netconf/yang we are
talking about.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:42 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
> Hey Adam,
>
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 17:08, wrote:
>
> > Was just wondering why I can't configure "netconf-yang feature
> > candidate-datastore" on csr1k?
>
has this card worked in a different chassis?
i suspect a bad card
On Thursday, July 25, 2019, Andrew K. wrote:
> I have this same issue with this same behavior. A reboot was also required
> to get it to detect. The kicker is we have one of these cards in the
> chassis working already. TAC told
27 14:20:55.287 CDT
Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 4.1.2[Default]
c-9k uptime is 5 years, 21 weeks, 4 days, 44 minutes
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at ht
XRv9k
-aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Is that XRv or XRv9K?
XRv was great as it didn't require as many resources.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:28 AM Aaron Gould wrote:
> Have you all been able to use EVE-NG ? My gosh, what an awesome emulator.
>
>
>
> I have eve-ng running…
>
>
>
> XRv
>
> v
began working with Junos a few years ago, and wow, it seemed to take routing os
to a whole other level than XR did… again, this could be in my head, but
curious what others think, IF, you have actually done enough work on both
platforms to know enough to speak to it.
-Aaron
.3 and 5.2.0: MTU is 1514 (not configurable) in 5.2.2: ServiceApp
interface will be set by default to Jumbo frame size (not configurable)
CSCuo63064
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo63064
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.neth
The initial is most likely due to arp. Depending how long it is between
runs, the arp cache may clear.
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:57 AM Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
> On 5/3/19 5:14 AM, Martin T wrote:
> > Hi Octavio,
> >
> > instead of a two-card laptop I used the available ports in server
> > named "
)
!!
!!
!!
Is there somewhere I could've seen these drops in a counter somewhere? Or a
way to enable/disable that behavior?
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
The only place I run bgp on pe-ce is for internet uplinks… (junos)
I use a few options to make it work…
- peer-as 123
- local-as 456
- local-as private
- local-as no-prepend-global-as
That works for me.
-Aaron
From: Nathan Lannine [mailto:nathan.lann...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March
Which reminds me... I recall if pe-ce is bgp, then redis into l3vpn is natural
and automatic true ?
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
hat port.and 389 and
53 and 123
- Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Bryan Holloway
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 1:38 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] UDP/0 ACL IOSXR issue?
Anyone awar
Ummm, that too. LOL
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
James Bensley
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:05 AM
To: Tom Ammon; Cisco-nsp List
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] segment routing/evpn on ASR920
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 02:36
look for ASR920 docs/support for EVPN-MPLS in
your desire to see if EVPN will work over SR?
I could be way off.
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nethe
we are running 6.4.2 in classic xr. no confidence with 64 bit at the
moment. need to see testing results from cisco first
On Thursday, December 20, 2018, Charles Spurgeon <
c.spurg...@austin.utexas.edu> wrote:
> * Tom Hill [2018-12-19 20:19:09 +]:
>
> > On 19/12/2018 19:59, Charles Spurgeon
Check out the white paper on terastream
On Thursday, October 11, 2018, harbor235 wrote:
> Gents,
>
> I have a green field IPv6 infrastructure that I am standing up, I plan on
> allocating unique IPv6 net block ranges for infrastructure nets
> (loopbacks/routerid, pt-to-pts), service delivery al
What are you all using for a telemetry collector ?
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
My cable modem mgmt and mta (voice) ip's are on different subnet than CPE.
And we have an ACL on the CMTS to not allow customer ip's to communicate with
those cm ip's
Aaron
> On Jul 29, 2018, at 5:38 PM, ring...@mail.com wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Wondering w
username: xrv
Enter secret:
Use the 'configure' command to modify this configuration.
User Access Verification
Username: xrv
Password:
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ios#
I'm in now !!
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.n
rname, it comes back and says "Failed authentication attempt by user
'' from 'console'..."
so i see this with xrv versions...
5.1.1
5.3.0
6.3.2
- Aaron
Thu Jul 26 13:35:26 UTC 2018 (/proc/self/fd/9): XR control plane: 5120MB RAM
Thu Jul 26 13:35:26 UTC 2018 (/proc/
ailed
-Aaron
..
Section:idt offset:0x006c
base:fed185bc
Section:pgdir offset:0x0070
Page Directory d000: PAE
System page at phys:00017000 user:fed15000 kern:fed17000
Starting next program at vfe0419f8
Unable to access "/dev/ser1" (2)
Restricted Rights Legend
cisco Sy
and a very small MPLS network with core
IGP area 1, ...well, area 1 continued to grow, and area 0 was eventually
decommissioned, and know area 1 remains :)
I guess I could work through maintenance windows and convert everything to
area 0, but I don't feel motivated to do so
Works fine
OSPF (area 0.0.0.1) MPLS/LDP network for
several years, I believe simplicity and only as much complexity as is required
for the job
Aaron
> On Jul 19, 2018, at 2:32 PM, ring...@mail.com wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have some practical design questions.
>
> 1. Is there a bette
Maybe something here
https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Tech-Cafe-Ask-the-Author-MPLS-in/EVPN-advantag
e-over-L2VPN-VPLS/td-p/291810
http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033905.do
https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/mpls-in-the/9781491905449/ch0
8.html
-Aaron
-Original Message
You wanna see the juniper configs for your ASR1006?
Not sure why we didn't use netflow. I guess because syslog worked and that's
where the docs led me
Aaron
> On Jul 9, 2018, at 2:52 AM, Ring Bit wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Could you post the nat configs?
syslogging to slow down
significantly
Aaron
> On Jul 8, 2018, at 10:12 AM, ring...@mail.com wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Have an ASR 1006 doing NAT translations, it is having around 300k+ and
> wanted to ask for a recommendation about logging those NAT translations.
>
> T
on't think I ever got to properly flow.
I also would have to bounce interfaces using a batch file anytime I
restarted gns3 or even if I added a new instance of XRv... so because of
that, I would never reboot my windows vm that it was all contained inside
and tried not to close g
I've actually taken out a little 2600 just to act as a 1-port terminal server
for this exact purpose
(maybe you can even use an old 2500)
Aaron
> On May 18, 2018, at 6:00 AM, Aaron Gould wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if you can use a console port for connecting to another
I'm not sure if you can use a console port for connecting to another router's
console port , but you can use the auxiliary (aux) port to do that. I've done
it many times
Aaron
> On May 18, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> last week
I wonder if it gets pruned right after the first packet maybe you have to
do some igmp config for the underlying vlan804 receiver segment's L2 interfaces
I'm guessing as it's been a while since I did much with mcast
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto
bow and afr
On Thursday, March 15, 2018, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2018, at 20:48, Garrett Skjelstad
> wrote:
> >
> > port-side
>
> What do you call the other side? Starboard?
>
> (SCNR.)
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list
completely taken up in the
latest 20 million dollar US Navy atm-to-the-desktop project…. And also , we had
no idea what he was talking about with mpls…. Then he erased those 4 letters
and went back to talking about LECS, LES, BUS, LEC operations in LANE ELAN’s….
K LOL….
-Aaron
As my teenage son would say. "bet" !
-Aaron
--
Heck yeah, pair of cheapest asr920 at each end and PWs between the DCs and
you're done.
adam
___
cisco-nsp mailing
ll this layer 2 networking madness is because of
that point stated above, I would think that someone (vendors/standards
bodies/companies) would/should be working really hard to make that server
stuff work in different bcast domains (different subnets)...so we wouldn't
have to do all t
Ha, thanks Justin, I just read the answer to my question I just posted...
OTV is cisco proprietary. Is OTV gaining steam in the industry as a
potential ietf standard ?
Interesting things you mention about assigning asics, and linecard
dependancies...
-Aaron
Thanks, so is OTV cisco proprietary ?
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ngineer traffic with same
knobs used in bgp-ip-routes. ?
I thought with evpn, you could have active-active multi-homed forwarding
across 2 ports, 2 CE's. ?
-Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/m
can be
done over non-mpls clouds ?...maybe these are things that would push
me/others in one direction or the other when choosing a l2-emulation
mechanism for DC or whatever we need it for.
- Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
htt
What is this syntax ? Is this an IOS command ? "Cisco-AVpair =
"ip:vrf-id=VRF1"
- Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ospf neighbors won't come up either with different mtu's
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark
Tinka
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 8:00 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600 ospf %100
I had something similar happen to me a couple months ago, and posted it
here...
[c-nsp] ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might
have
https://www.mail-archive.com/cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg65794.html
- Aaron
___
cisco-nsp
Size of the ospf table
On Sunday, January 14, 2018, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 13/Jan/18 18:33, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
>
> > Hmm could it be that you hit the mtu limit of your links (which is not
> 9216
> > but just 9000)?
>
> That would make sense - but if it's been working all thi
This "ip vrf autoclassify source" feature looks to be a very nice auto-pbr
solution for allowing multiple vrf's on one interface!
I'd like to know if anyone has used it, particularly in the cable modem
world...on Cisco uBR7246VXR, u
1 - 100 of 951 matches
Mail list logo