[c-nsp] mpls forwarding and ip forwarding

Hi, As we know, if i enable mpls on the appropriate interface then the ip packets will be forwarded based on mpls forwarding table not the ip forwarding anymore.for some reason.my question is that is there any way to make the ip forwarding on the interfaces which mpls enabled?

[c-nsp] Reply:R: mpls forwarding and ip forwarding

Hi,Brian Thank you for your reply!but i think it can not meet the requirements for what i need. the traffic between two vpn sites will always follow the FEC and this command can not distinguish them. At 2014-02-26 17:02:35,Brian Turnbow b.turn...@twt.it wrote: Hi, Hi, As we

[c-nsp] what is the difference between LISP、OTV、FabricPath and TRILL ?

Could anyone can explain what is the difference between those technology when using them to set up a L2 network in DC. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] Reply:Re: what is the difference between LISP、OTV、FabricPath and TRILL ?

Hi Sander, Thank you for correcting my misunderstanding.a few days ago, i started to learn FabricPath and TRILL.the question is i can not find some good materials to read.what i want is something very detailed to talk about these technologies.BTW,the following pdf file which you recommended i

[c-nsp] Reply: ASR9K license install problem

There are two types of licenses on ASR platform: Permanent licenses and Evaluation licenses you are still able to configure L3VPN on your box without a Permanent license,but your L3VPN function will break off once your Evaluation license expired(90 days).also,you better install and manage

[c-nsp] Reply:RE: why vpls need some special line cards to support

] On Behalf Of ying-xiang Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 17:27 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] why vpls need some special line cards to support i have been confused by this question for a long time and i have been looking up some stuff from CCO.but still can not find the answer.what's

[c-nsp] why vpls need some special line cards to support

i have been confused by this question for a long time and i have been looking up some stuff from CCO.but still can not find the answer.what's the difference between when a router need to handle encapsulation of L3VPN and L2vpn?anyone who could give the point?

[c-nsp] how many maximum BGP routers can be to reside in one AS？

in another words,is there a limit to be the amount of one AS BGP routers? we have a network design will put 2500+ routers running ibgp session into a single AS.of course,RR or confederation is required.even so, i am not sure it will be done with this design.AFAIK, router’s memory is a import

[c-nsp] Reply:Re: about IOS XR 4.0.1

Hi Pelle thank you so much ;) At 2011-03-31 14:14:16，Per Carlson pe...@hemmop.com wrote: Hi. does anyone konw on iox xr 4.0.1 version there is any command function equals to the command no bgp default route-target filteron ios version? It's retain route-target all: router bgp AS

[c-nsp] about IOS XR 4.0.1

hi does anyone konw on iox xr 4.0.1 version there is any command function equals to the command no bgp default route-target filteron ios version? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] the result of show mpls forwarding-table is all Untagged

hi what reason can lead to the following result of show mpls forwarding-table ? sh mpls forwarding-table Local OutgoingPrefixBytes tag Outgoing Next Hop tagtag or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface 16 Untagged10.8.19.169/320

[c-nsp] strange problem about stm-1

hi,everyone i got a very strage problem about stm-1 which installed in a cisco 7606-s chassis with a sup-32 engine. according to the 3-7-3 divide the stm-1 into 63 2MB E1 ports that are connected to our branch devices,respectively recently,many 2MB lines have encountered varying packet

[c-nsp] rsvp can not generate SNMP traps

HI,everyone i am testing rsvp function on my lab rack and the requirements is very simple.i just want the rsvp generates a snmp trap to a NMS server.however it does not work,i can get any information by using debug snmp packets. the following is the part of configuration,could someone

[c-nsp] supervisor 32 nvram chip

hi anyone could tell me where i can find the nvram chip on the supervios 32 engine,i think it can be replaced ?! ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] 6500 ipsec vpn

hi may i config ipsec vpn between two 6500 chassis without vpn service module? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] ipsec over mpls vpn

hi,everyone is there possible to terminate a ipsec tunnel on a VRF enabled interface on PE routers? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] the ospf 0*E2 route type can not be redistributed between two ospf process

hi,folk anyone knows the reason why i can not redistribute the O*E2 route which generated by one ospf router using default-information originate command to another ospf process? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] even Eompls vc is up but can not work

hi the vc still is up,but the eompls does't work suddenly. i got the show message on the cli Local interface: VFI SDH-NEC VFI up MPLS VC type is VFI, interworking type is Ethernet Destination address: 192.168.4.16, VC ID: 807, VC status: up Output interface: Te2/0/0, imposed label

[c-nsp] about eompls on 7609

hi： following is my topology brief： SwitchA---PE1（7609-1）---PE2（7609-2）---SwitchB Both switchA and switchB are configured a vlan100 to achieve layer two transport through EoMPLS and they works without any issue but i got an error when i tried to set the same vlan id on the PEs could anyone