Hello list .
Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE and Sup 720
3BXL.
We are running 12.2(18)SXF8 on it on both 10GE linecards went down on the
same time this morning hereWe had to reload it
to get things back to normal .
Any inputs are welcome
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list .
Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE and Sup 720
3BXL.
We are running 12.2(18)SXF8 on it on both 10GE linecards went down on the
same time this morning hereWe had to
Hello list .
Has anyone ever encountered
David Ponsdesserre
+44 207 762 4877
-
London Telecom and Network
Societe Generale Corporate and Investment Banking
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
31/10/07 13:14
To
David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list .
Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
31/10/07 13:14
To
David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list
-
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
31/10/07 13:14
To
David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello list
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
31/10/07 14:12
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED], cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]
Running out of space on the 3BXL would be impressive at this point,
unless you are doing testing
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:39:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all for the replies .
I am not about how to check the number a tcam entries on 6500 sh tcam
counts detail ip?
David,
Try these out for size:
sh run | inc mls
sh mls cef sum
show platform hardware
PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:39:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks to all for the replies .
I am not about how to check the number a tcam entries on 6500 sh tcam
counts detail ip
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:57:55PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for this Jared. As you will see below i think we are far away to
overflow the Tcam on this switch .
You should be able to re-enable cef by doing:
conf t
ip cef distributed
if that doesn't work, what
10 matches
Mail list logo