[c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread david . ponsdesserre
Hello list . Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE and Sup 720 3BXL. We are running 12.2(18)SXF8 on it on both 10GE linecards went down on the same time this morning hereWe had to reload it to get things back to normal . Any inputs are welcome

Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread Phil Mayers
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello list . Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE and Sup 720 3BXL. We are running 12.2(18)SXF8 on it on both 10GE linecards went down on the same time this morning hereWe had to

[c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread david . ponsdesserre
Hello list . Has anyone ever encountered David Ponsdesserre +44 207 762 4877 - London Telecom and Network Societe Generale Corporate and Investment Banking

Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread david . ponsdesserre
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 31/10/07 13:14 To David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC] On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello list . Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE

Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread Mohacsi Janos
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 31/10/07 13:14 To David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC] On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello list

Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread Phil Bedard
- - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 31/10/07 13:14 To David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC] On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello list

Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread david . ponsdesserre
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 31/10/07 14:12 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED], cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC] Running out of space on the 3BXL would be impressive at this point, unless you are doing testing

Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread Jared Mauch
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:39:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to all for the replies . I am not about how to check the number a tcam entries on 6500 sh tcam counts detail ip? David, Try these out for size: sh run | inc mls sh mls cef sum show platform hardware

Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread david . ponsdesserre
PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC] On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:39:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to all for the replies . I am not about how to check the number a tcam entries on 6500 sh tcam counts detail ip

Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

2007-10-31 Thread Jared Mauch
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:57:55PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for this Jared. As you will see below i think we are far away to overflow the Tcam on this switch . You should be able to re-enable cef by doing: conf t ip cef distributed if that doesn't work, what