Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-08-03 Thread Christian MacNevin
:tdur...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:31 PM To: Christian MacNevin Cc: Chris Nicholls; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Christian MacNevin wrote: > Oh really? So there's still no native ipv6 MPLS?

Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-07-02 Thread David Freedman
> > -Original Message- > From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se] > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 1:47 PM > To: Christian MacNevin > Cc: Tim Durack; Chris Nicholls; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-07-01 Thread Christian MacNevin
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6? On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Christian MacNevin wrote: > Anyone from cisco care to comment on the LDPv6 road map? Last I checked (couple of months ago) there wasn't even a standard for it, I expressed my opinion in the IE

Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-07-01 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Christian MacNevin wrote: Anyone from cisco care to comment on the LDPv6 road map? Last I checked (couple of months ago) there wasn't even a standard for it, I expressed my opinion in the IETF WG IPv6 control plane for MPLS needs feature parity with IPv4, and LDPv6 is def

Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-07-01 Thread Christian MacNevin
Anyone from cisco care to comment on the LDPv6 road map? -Original Message- From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdur...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:31 PM To: Christian MacNevin Cc: Chris Nicholls; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6? On

Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-07-01 Thread Tim Durack
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Christian MacNevin wrote: > Oh really? So there's still no native ipv6 MPLS? > > OK, well thanks to finding out about the new CLI and this doc, which seems to > be making out that everything should work just fine: > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configu

Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-07-01 Thread Christian MacNevin
Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:54 AM To: Christian MacNevin Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6? I have it running, 6PE is pretty simple I extended our current peer groups for ibgp into the address-family ipv6, and added the "send-label" attribute. then peer over a v4 tra

Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-06-30 Thread Mateusz Blaszczyk
On 30 June 2010 02:57, Harold Ritter wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Most recent IOS versions should support 6PE. The command "mpls ipv6 > source-interface" has been removed from most recent IOS versions as well. > This command only applied to locally originated traffic and the source > address sele

Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-06-29 Thread Harold Ritter
Hi Christian, Most recent IOS versions should support 6PE. The command "mpls ipv6 source-interface" has been removed from most recent IOS versions as well. This command only applied to locally originated traffic and the source address selection is now as per RFC3484. Regards Le 2010-06-29 à

[c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

2010-06-29 Thread Christian MacNevin
Ok,so anybody got any experience with 6PE? I'm having trouble finding an image that supports the feature, particularly the command: 'mpls ipv6..' anything. Anybody? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christ