Thanks Tom for your kind email.
I got your points.
our customers will never accept any interruption !!!
i can move some VLANs from 1st trunk to 2nd one, in this case should i care
about loop ? i think it will not happen , each trunk will carry different
VLANs and at swtich side configure 2nd
There should be no loops as the two router ports are routed, not switched.
Configure the second trunk on the switch, and plug the cable in to the
second router port, make sure its up/up on both ends and configure a test
service on it to be 100% sure traffic is flowing over it.
Then in a text
Sorry, For some reason I read 7606 as 7206. Dont far too much work with the
7200 platform. :-)
That could present a different situation. Are you using SVIs on the 7606 to
terminate the customer VLANs, or sub-interfaces?
If sub-interfaces, then there shouldn't be a problem because the ports are
Hello Friends,
I have a Cisco SW ( 3560 ) with one Trunk link to my router ( 7606 ), Trunk
link is fully utilized so i need to add 2nd Trunk.
Shall all move some customers from old trunk to 2nd one and create a new
subterface for them ?
I am think if i can create bundle and add subinterfaces
Depending on the hashing algoritm, it is still possible for one link to run
hotter than the other in a bundle.
Just like it is possible for the right mix of customers to run one link
hotter than the other.
Using a second trunk means that most customers will not experience any
interruption, only
