Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:02:21PM +0100, Dean Smith wrote:
Our next load balancing requirement is now in design...and I spent today
with a Foundry SE.
You might want to check out the Citrix Netscaler series. We discovered
them about two years ago, and are happy users since then.
We do
@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CSM for service providers
I've been running the CSM for about the year and a half I've been at
the
service provider I work for. I like the fact that it's pretty scalable
and
that you can be multiple L2 hops down the line and build it out
however
you like
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:06:44AM -0400, Fred Reimer wrote:
I'm not in sales, so I don't have to worry about cost ;-), but I do know
there was, and still may be, a special on the appliance (not the module)
where you get some large percentage off (35% or 50% or something) in
addition to
They are definitely trying to get people to migrate towards the ACE appliance
that don't have 6500's. The licensing thing I find annoying but I guess it
keeps it affordable for a company that may only need 100MB of 500MB of
throughput from the device. They were (as of a month or so ago) also
Gert Doering wrote:
I always thought the ACE has a list price of zero - all you need to
buy is the license for the number of contexts and the license for the
amount of gbits you want it to handle...
That's how our's were billed out. The line item with the dollar amount
was ACE-04G-LIC. The
Moreover, CSM 3.X has announced end-of-support in 2011. While
there is no comparable EOL/EOS data (that I know of) on CSM 4.2
software, I have no reason to think it's going to drop out of
support soon.
While the CSM may not formally be announced EoX, it's not sup-
ported in recent versions
And if Cisco wants to hold us CSM customers hostage for working
redundancy, we'll find another solution.
In my experience, redundancy on CSM has worked fine.
The fact that you have to more or less manually configure and
maintain redundancy, which some people bitch a lot, makes me
wonder...
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:27:00PM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
While the CSM may not formally be announced EoX, it's not sup-
ported in recent versions of SX (since SXH) or SR (since SRA),
which pretty much amounts to the same thing: R.I.P.
Should anyone be surprised?
For me,
Sounds like no one has used the ACE
I have used the ACE in a critical (but simple) HTTP load balancing
environment running 1Gb/s throughput.
We endured 6 months of pain before we got a fully stable platform - and
only then because we knocked off every L7 feature and now run in pure L4.
Last
Hello everyone,
I'm looking to solicit some input from others that are using the Cisco
CSM, in particular, service providers that are using it to host layer
4-7 switching for customers. The archives don't seem to have a ton of
opinions on these guys.
In general, I like the device's performance
over a year since the product was available.
Vijay Ramcharan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Vandegrift
Sent: April 07, 2008 15:20
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] CSM for service providers
Hello everyone,
I'm looking
From: Ramcharan, Vijay A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:30:17 +
To: Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED], cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Conversation: [c-nsp] CSM for service providers
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CSM for service providers
Last I knew, the CSM was on its way out
Of Ross Vandegrift
Sent: April 07, 2008 15:20
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] CSM for service providers
Hello everyone,
I'm looking to solicit some input from others that are using the Cisco
CSM, in particular, service providers that are using it to host layer
4-7 switching
] On Behalf Of Ross Vandegrift
Sent: April 07, 2008 15:20
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] CSM for service providers
Hello everyone,
I'm looking to solicit some input from others that are using the Cisco
CSM, in particular, service providers that are using it to host layer
14 matches
Mail list logo
