15 11:15:14 +
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DR location
From: and...@2sheds.de
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:45 PM, M K wrote:
Hii have a customer requesting to have a DR in another country (other than the
primary one)What is the best solution to offer
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:45 PM, M K wrote:
> Hii have a customer requesting to have a DR in another country (other than
> the primary one)What is the best solution to offer ? He is asking for the
> same IP address to move to the DR in case of the failure of the primary
> node is that possible ?!
> On 22-Feb-15, at 08:47 , Roland Dobbins wrote:
>
>
> He should be looking for redundant active/active, instead. DNS, not an IP
> address, should be used to reach each active instance of the service in
> question.
>
i think true active/active becomes a nirvana that we all would like to ac
On 22 Feb 2015, at 21:45, M K wrote:
He is asking for the same IP address to move to the DR in case of the
failure of the primary node is that possible ?!
'Disaster recovery' is an outdated mainframe concept that has no place
in the modern world.
He should be looking for redundant
Hii have a customer requesting to have a DR in another country (other than the
primary one)What is the best solution to offer ? He is asking for the same IP
address to move to the DR in case of the failure of the primary node is that
possible ?!
_
