I've used this to fake local switching as well and it works fine.
Since another limitation is the inability to do VPLS, you have to work
with hokey solutions or purchase expensive gear, or use another vendor.
Phil
On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:54 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:2
Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
> Not with SVI but with mux-uni it works just well:
>
> RouterA:
> interface TenGigabitEthernet6/2.3097
> encapsulation dot1Q 3097
> xconnect 888 encapsulation mpls
>
> RouterB:
> interface GigabitEthernet4/15.888
> encapsulation dot1Q 888
> xconnect 888 encapsula
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:36:57AM -0500, Jose wrote:
> One quick side question since we're all talking EoMPLS. Is it possible
> to do VLAN translation/remapping with EoMPLS? Can one side have SVI 800
> and the other side have SVI 400 but use VC 300 on both xconnect
> statements to "tie them"
On 2/6/08, Peter Rathlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 06:36 -0500, Jose wrote:
> > One quick side question since we're all talking EoMPLS. Is it possible
> > to do VLAN translation/remapping with EoMPLS? Can one side have SVI 800
> > and the other side have SVI 400 but use V
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 06:36 -0500, Jose wrote:
> One quick side question since we're all talking EoMPLS. Is it possible
> to do VLAN translation/remapping with EoMPLS? Can one side have SVI 800
> and the other side have SVI 400 but use VC 300 on both xconnect
> statements to "tie them" togethe
Jose wrote:
> Hi everyone. I'm doing some preliminary testing in our lab in order to
> deploy EoMPLS on our ethernet network but I've run into a little bit of
> a snag and was wondering if anyone could clarify something for me.
>
> The setup I have is 3550---7603-SUP32---7204VXR---3550
>
> I hav
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:28 +0100, Michel Renfer wrote:
> > EoMPLS Port Mode uses a physical interface to transport "raw" Ethernet
> > frames, not just a single VLAN, which means you can run trunks through
> > it. We use it as a cheap way of having local switching using LAN
> > cards.
>
> How do y
Hi Jose,
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:44 -0500, Jose wrote:
> Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > Port mode (physical<->physical) works on 6500 SXF, not 7600 SXF (or
> > 12.2SR at all?) according to FN. Very strange, but one of the few
> > feature differences between 6500 and 7600 on SXF.
>
> I'm familiar w
Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 21:48 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:15:40PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
>>
>>> I'm in a similar boat as Jose. What options for EoMPLS do we people
>>> with 6700s have? I'm trying physical to physical with no luck.
Chris Griffin wrote:
> For 12.2SR there is mux-uni, which allows you to run ports in switchport
> mode, but then create a subinterface to support eompls.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/hfb5p
>
> Says its supported by normal LAN cards, but haven't tried it yet.
Chris,
That's definitely interesting. I
Wade (wwade) wrote:
>> Jose,
>>
>> SVI (vlan interface) based EoMPLS requires an OSM, SIP-400, SIP-600
>> or ES-20 as core facing interface.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>&g
Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 21:48 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:15:40PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
>>> I'm in a similar boat as Jose. What options for EoMPLS do we people
>>> with 6700s have? I'm trying physical to physical with no luck.
>> physical t
Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:15:40PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
>> I'm in a similar boat as Jose. What options for EoMPLS do we people
>> with 6700s have? I'm trying physical to physical with no luck.
>
> physical to physical should work, according to the documenta
That should be SRC, not SXC...
Phil
On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Phil Bedard wrote:
> I've setup port mode between a RSP720 SXC to a 6500 SUP720 SXH and
> it worked fine. The lack of VPLS support on the 6500/7600 without
> an expensive upstream linecard is a huge oversight imho.
>
> Phil
>
I've setup port mode between a RSP720 SXC to a 6500 SUP720 SXH and it
worked fine. The lack of VPLS support on the 6500/7600 without an
expensive upstream linecard is a huge oversight imho.
Phil
On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 21:48 +0100, Gert Doer
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 21:48 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:15:40PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
> > I'm in a similar boat as Jose. What options for EoMPLS do we people
> > with 6700s have? I'm trying physical to physical with no luck.
>
> physical to physical should work
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:15:40PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
> I'm in a similar boat as Jose. What options for EoMPLS do we people
> with 6700s have? I'm trying physical to physical with no luck.
physical to physical should work, according to the documentation. I
haven't tried it yet, t
day, February 05, 2008 11:16 AM
>> To: Cisco
>> Subject: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 & 7200 config clarification
>>
>> Hi everyone. I'm doing some preliminary testing in our lab
>> in order to deploy EoMPLS on our ethernet network but I've
>> run i
t; Subject: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 & 7200 config clarification
>
> Hi everyone. I'm doing some preliminary testing in our lab
> in order to deploy EoMPLS on our ethernet network but I've
> run into a little bit of a snag and was wondering if anyone
> could clarify
> Is this the only way to get EoMPLS to work between these two devices?
> I'm sure I've seen the xconnect command used on VLAN interfaces before
> and it has worked fine.
Use VLAN interfaces on both sides, or subinterfaces on both sides, or
ports on both sides.
Some platforms/versions also don't
Hi everyone. I'm doing some preliminary testing in our lab in order to
deploy EoMPLS on our ethernet network but I've run into a little bit of
a snag and was wondering if anyone could clarify something for me.
The setup I have is 3550---7603-SUP32---7204VXR---3550
I have VLAN 800 setup to cros
21 matches
Mail list logo
