Hi Everyone,
What is recommended practice when configuring OSPFv3/IPv6 Loopbacks? Do you
assign /128's or /64's - If /64's do you need to enable ipv6 ospf network
point-to-point under the loopback so that the IPv6 address is advertised as a
/64 and not as /128?
And Is it any more
On 21/11/13 08:38, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi Everyone,
What is recommended practice when configuring OSPFv3/IPv6
Loopbacks? Do you assign /128's or /64's - If /64's do you need to
enable ipv6 ospf network point-to-point under the loopback so that
the IPv6 address is advertised as a /64 and not
Thanks to everyone who replied - /128 it is.
From: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:38:51 +1100
Subject: [c-nsp] IPv6 / OSPFv3
Hi Everyone,
What is recommended practice when configuring OSPFv3/IPv6 Loopbacks? Do
you assign /128's
/128 for me too.
On Thursday, 21 November 2013, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 21/11/13 08:38, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi Everyone,
What is recommended practice when configuring OSPFv3/IPv6
Loopbacks? Do you assign /128's or /64's - If /64's do you need to
enable ipv6 ospf network point-to-point
Same here. We use /128s and configure the loopback interface to be part
of the ospf process and given area.
Jose
On 11/21/2013 5:10 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 21/11/13 08:38, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi Everyone,
What is recommended practice when configuring OSPFv3/IPv6
Loopbacks? Do you
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:38:51 AM CiscoNSP List
wrote:
What is recommended practice when configuring
OSPFv3/IPv6 Loopbacks? Do you assign /128's or /64's -
/128.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 04:06:31 PM Lobo wrote:
Same here. We use /128s and configure the loopback
interface to be part of the ospf process and given area.
I'd normally just make it passive (although passive-
interface for OSPF in IOS behaves different than passive-
interface for
On 21/11/13 14:29, Pete Lumbis wrote:
Take a look at the NANOG best common practices for IPv6 addressing
http://bcop.nanog.org/images/6/62/BCOP-IPv6_Subnetting.pdf
The suggestion is to carve out the first /64 for loopbacks and then assign
them all as /128s
This is a good strategy. FWIW we
Take a look at the NANOG best common practices for IPv6 addressing
http://bcop.nanog.org/images/6/62/BCOP-IPv6_Subnetting.pdf
The suggestion is to carve out the first /64 for loopbacks and then assign
them all as /128s
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:38 AM, CiscoNSP List
