Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-24 Thread Jeff Tantsura
TE is supported by OSPF only, some other stuff as well Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: dinsdag 24 april 2007 15:54 To: Joe Shen Cc: nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP? Hi

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-23 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Hi, http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0006/katz.html jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of omar parihuana Sent: zaterdag 21 april 2007 19:32 To: nsp Subject: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP? Hi list, We're redesigning a small

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-22 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2007-04-22 03:04 -0400), Richard A Steenbergen wrote: Welcome to the miracle of having every config command lag because it has to query against a tacacs server. Sensible people would have a) not designed a system that is so easy to fuck up, or b) at least have a local configuration

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-22 Thread heh heh
True, but the lag isn't that bad compared to having to reload the router. :) Defining things locally becomes a nightmare to manage, but having a local copy that is dl'ed from a central server(s) would be useful On 4/22/07, Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at

[c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-21 Thread omar parihuana
Hi list, We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 PE Routers and 2 P Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the IGP is OSPF, however ISIS was proposed too. What is the best? IS-IS or OSPF? and Why? regarding the small network. Thank you for your suggestions... Rgds. -- Omar

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-21 Thread Gary Stanley
At 01:50 PM 4/21/2007, Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\) wrote: check the archives, this has been discussed before.. it boils down to use what you're most comfortable and familiar with, and as you're using OSPF already, the choice should be clear. Indeed. Stick with OSPF.

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-21 Thread Alex Burba
How about just to read this: :) http://www.amazon.com/OSPF-Choosing-Large-Scale-Networks/dp/0321168798/ref=pd_bbs_2/102-8633462-4102568?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1177196013sr=8-2 On 22/04/07, Gary Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 01:50 PM 4/21/2007, Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\) wrote: check the

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-21 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: omar parihuana wrote on Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:32 PM: Hi list, We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 PE Routers and 2 P Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the IGP is OSPF, however