Cheers, I labbed it up om ASR1001 -> 4948now the ASR1001 had SPA1x5G, it
had 2 working GE-Tsadded the same SFP's (Copper/GE-T), the ASR logged the
insertion, you could vie the details of the SFPs, but we could not get them to
link to anything (and yes, we had enabled the ports
Copy the config off-box, trim it down to just the subinterfaces, copy
that resulting file to bootflash. Delete the members, add the new
members, and if you have to restore the subinterfaces, copy
bootflash:subints-config-bits running-config
It's not hard, you can have your ducks all ready to
Well tried this last night, and the ASR1K did not cooperate.4500X, played
nice and behaved like the 2960 (Adding 10G ports to the portchan, rejected them
due to speed difference, but still adds them to the portchan, but in suspended
modeso all good there, but ASR1K, (As well as only
I dont believe that you can remove all of a portcchan's member Ints (Ive not
tested this, but read a forum post were someone was attempting something
similar (1G->10G), and the router threw an error when attempting to remove the
last 1G Int (Something along the lines of "portchan cannot be
On 12/06/17 19:28, Nick Cutting wrote:
> I think this is possible, but with a little bit of downtime when you change
> the new links from 1000 to ten gig.
> You should be able to lab this up with 1000Mbit and 100Mbit on an old switch,
> nothing laying around?
If this causes a little downtime,
I think this is possible, but with a little bit of downtime when you change the
new links from 1000 to ten gig.
You should be able to lab this up with 1000Mbit and 100Mbit on an old switch,
nothing laying around?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp
Hi Everyone,
Ive researched this, and the info Ive read s not entirely definitive (I dont
have an opportunity to test the migration in a lab unfortunately_
We have an existing port-chan on an asr1006, with 4 x 1Gb portsegress from
ASR1006 on the member ports is very balanced, but
