Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

On 22/01/16 06:55, Gert Doering wrote: >> Yeah, one PSU would be enough - that'll draw about ~1300-1400W, adjusted >> > from the spec that I've got setup elsewhere. > Is the 9k6 PSU so expensive that it's worth running a router on a > single feed? I wouldn't do it, but I did know the answer. :)

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

> Peter Kranz > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 11:18 PM > > Happy to clarify James, to expand: > > " Anyone have any thoughts the most cost effective chassis available > currently that supports 100G ports? Need to route upwards of 200 Gbps and > handle full tables, but cost is definitely a

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

On 21 January 2016 at 09:13, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: >> Peter Kranz >> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 11:18 PM >> >> Happy to clarify James, to expand: >> >> " Anyone have any thoughts the most cost effective chassis available >> currently that supports 100G ports?

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

On 21/01/16 09:13, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Maybe the cheapest would be good old ASR9K6, -now with the advent of new > chassis these should be pretty cheap > where each would have just a single A9K-RSP440-LT -that's 180G/slot > upgradeable to 440G/slot (I'm pretty sure customer won't be pulling

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

Hi, On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:57:35PM +, Tom Hill wrote: > On 21/01/16 09:13, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > > Maybe the cheapest would be good old ASR9K6, -now with the advent of new > > chassis these should be pretty cheap > > where each would have just a single A9K-RSP440-LT -that's 180G/slot

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

On 21/Jan/16 01:17, Peter Kranz wrote: > > 1 100G port facing an upstream > 1 100G port facing the other chassis > 10 10G or 4 40G ports facing the downstream customer > Full routes The Cisco NCS5000 is an option, but I don't think it supports full tables. What seems most viable to me is the

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

Happy to clarify James, to expand: " Anyone have any thoughts the most cost effective chassis available currently that supports 100G ports? Need to route upwards of 200 Gbps and handle full tables, but cost is definitely a factor." I would be using 2x100G ports to upstream providers pulling full

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

I guess it depends where in your network this is going but have you seen the new ASR907's - I haven't seen any prices yet so can't comment. Reach out to your Cisco bod. James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

On 20/01/16 22:17, Peter Kranz wrote: > Anyone have any thoughts the most cost effective chassis available currently > that supports 100G ports? Need to route upwards of 200 Gbps and handle full > tables, but cost is definitely a factor. I suspect you can pick two out of the three in most cases:

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

Sorry I missed the full table requirement. Can you give some more info on what you want, I mentioned ASR907's because I'd like to see someone deploy the 100G cards :) But various cisco do you for 200Gbps. Do you want the smallest box that can do that, or have you got space/power/cooling/budget

Re: [c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:34 PM, James Bensley wrote: > > Sorry I missed the full table requirement. I’ve used 9904 for this before. - Jared ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] Most cost effective 100G router?

Anyone have any thoughts the most cost effective chassis available currently that supports 100G ports? Need to route upwards of 200 Gbps and handle full tables, but cost is definitely a factor. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com pkr...@unwiredltd.com