Henrry,
MBGP for multicast would solve the issue... you can establish a mBGP
session between R1 and R2 (using iBGP with IP wan interfaces) advertise the
source and destination in the multicast address family after that you can
change BGP attributes in order to handle the downstream traffic (I supp
Not really an expert on multicast but would vrf-lite be a solution?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of henrry huaman
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 10:13 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp
above is better than my quick thoughts.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of henrry huaman
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 9:13 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp
Hi Guys,
We have the next scenary:
R1- e0/0---e0/0- R2
\ e0/1---e0/1--/
And, we want to have differents groups multicast passing by its own path.
Is possible to configure any feature "PBR" with multicast?
R1 e0/0 --- only group 239.32.32.32 e0/0 R2
R1
