.net] On Behalf Of Andy Saykao
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:36 AM
To: Ivan Pepelnjak; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT-ON-A-STICK for VRF Traffic
I've been able to get this working using NVI but I'm finding the
traceroute is a bit strange. It times out after
ete.
Not sure why all the hops don't show up when I do a traceroute from
either CE's
Thanks.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Pepelnjak [mailto:i...@ioshints.info]
Sent: Monday, 17 August 2009 11:42 PM
To: Andy Saykao; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] NA
From: Ivan Pepelnjak [mailto:i...@ioshints.info]
Sent: Monday, 17 August 2009 11:42 PM
To: Andy Saykao; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] NAT-ON-A-STICK for VRF Traffic
It's probably easier to use the NAT Virtual Interface ("ip nat enable"
instead of "ip nat insid
enabled" can be used in a MPLS
L3 VPN enviroment and whether I've set up the NAT-PE correctly???
Thanks.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Pepelnjak [mailto:i...@ioshints.info]
Sent: Monday, 17 August 2009 11:42 PM
To: Andy Saykao; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [
Message-
> From: Andy Saykao [mailto:andy.say...@staff.netspace.net.au]
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:59 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] NAT-ON-A-STICK for VRF Traffic
>
> I want to set up a NAT-PE Internet Gateway and NAT vrf traffic using
> NAT-ON-A-
I want to set up a NAT-PE Internet Gateway and NAT vrf traffic using
NAT-ON-A-STICK. Is this possible?
Easy enough to do when it's IP traffic using policy-based routing as per
this article:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a
0080094430.shtml
Just wonderi
