Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-31 Thread Joseph Mays
List Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 4:31 PM To: Joseph Mays ; Chris Boyd ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem Very bleary eyed - but shouldnt this: ip prefix-list max23 seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0 ge 8 le 16 be: ip prefix-list max16 seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0 ge 8

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-30 Thread CiscoNSP List
: cisco-nsp on behalf of Joseph Mays Sent: Thursday, 27 October 2016 7:06 AM To: Chris Boyd; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem > On the plus side, if you screw up routing with a mistake, you'll free a lot > of memory :-/ See, there could be a si

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-28 Thread Nick Hilliard
Justin Krejci wrote: > We use prefix-lists (not ACL) in our route-maps, BGP filtering, etc > but I am curious what is wrong with distribute-lists specifically. Is > it just that they are old and less efficient CPU-wise or something? > Are there known bugs in certain use cases? distribute lists are

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-27 Thread Mark Tinka
On 27/Oct/16 21:54, Justin Krejci wrote: > We use prefix-lists (not ACL) in our route-maps, BGP filtering, etc but I am > curious what is wrong with distribute-lists specifically. > Is it just that they are old and less efficient CPU-wise or something? Are > there known bugs in certain use cas

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-27 Thread Justin Krejci
: Nick Cutting [ncutt...@edgetg.com] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 1:54 PM To: Jared Mauch; Justin Krejci Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Router memory problem We had a case where we used distribute lists matching prefix lists, but some engineers were forgetting the keyword

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-27 Thread Nick Cutting
o-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:46 PM To: Justin Krejci Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:37:35PM +, Justin Krejci wrote: > What is wrong with distribute-lists? You sh

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-27 Thread Jared Mauch
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:37:35PM +, Justin Krejci wrote: > What is wrong with distribute-lists? You should be using a prefix-list, as it was designed for this type of function. distribute-lists (and a bunch of other IOS crutches) should go away as part of the legacy.

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-27 Thread Justin Krejci
] Router memory problem On 26/Oct/16 22:06, Joseph Mays wrote: > > router bgp > distribute-list prefix max16 in You really shouldn't be using distribute lists. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://p

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Oct/16 22:06, Joseph Mays wrote: > > router bgp > distribute-list prefix max16 in You really shouldn't be using distribute lists. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Joseph Mays
could clear the bgp tables, but I'm hesitant to do that. Maybe better to just let it drop over time. -Original Message- From: Chris Boyd Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 3:57 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem > On Oct 26, 2016,

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Chris Boyd
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 2:19 PM, Joseph Mays wrote: > > I was thinking about using a prefix list to limit the size of the BGP routing > table. Hard to do if you can’t see the config, but I suppose if you are careful you could tftp it in, since you mentioned that’s still working. On the plus si

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Chuck Church
: [c-nsp] Router memory problem Perhaps. Looks like, but I don't know if it's TOO low. core-gw1.noc#show mem HeadTotal(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b) Largest(b) Processor 6381CC60 78368 438972176 5506192 945056 898812 I/O

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Joseph Mays
I was thinking about using a prefix list to limit the size of the BGP routing table. -Original Message- From: Chris Boyd Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:59 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem On Oct 26, 2016, at 1:51 PM, Chuck Church

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Joseph Mays
226055602228776022426364 Maybe if I reduce the size of the bgp tables. -Original Message- From: Chuck Church Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:51 PM To: 'Joseph Mays' ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Router memory problem Is the router out o

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Chris Boyd
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 1:51 PM, Chuck Church wrote: > > Is the router out of RAM? A really low memory condition might cause this. > 'show mem' or 'show log' (if configured) might show some malloc errors if > that is the issue. +1 I had a similar issue a while back with a 7206VXR that was get

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Chuck Church
Of Joseph Mays Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:28 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Router memory problem I’m dealing with a serious problem on a router I can only connect to remotely. Show run on the router returns nothing. core-gw1.noc#show run core-gw1.noc# The running

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Joseph Mays
y, October 26, 2016 2:28 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Router memory problem I’m dealing with a serious problem on a router I can only connect to remotely. Show run on the router returns nothing. core-gw1.noc#show run core-gw1.noc# The running config is definitely there, though

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Nick Cutting
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Router memory problem I’m dealing with a serious problem on a router I can only connect to remotely. Show run on the router returns nothing. core-gw1.noc#show run core-gw1.noc# The running config is definitely there, though and the router is operati

[c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-26 Thread Joseph Mays
I’m dealing with a serious problem on a router I can only connect to remotely. Show run on the router returns nothing. core-gw1.noc#show run core-gw1.noc# The running config is definitely there, though and the router is operational. And interestingly the system that copies the router’s config e