bject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird error
What IOS version do you use?
One corrected ECC error is ok. If it continue to repeat you need to change DRAM
module
Ziv Leyes wrote:
> I just find it funny that there's nobody that can tell somet
@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird error
Hey Gert,
I know what cisco-nsp is, I know it's not an official Cisco TAC, and I'm not
expecting anybody to act like that, I just find it funny that there's nobody
that can tell something about it...
I've been reading all the mails
--Original Message-
> > From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 5:06 PM
> > To: Ziv Leyes
> > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird error
> >
> > Can you check for the crashinfo file on bootflas
n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 5:06 PM
> To: Ziv Leyes
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird error
>
> Can you check for the crashinfo file on bootflash: and also provide:
> sh ver
> sh stack
>
> Rodney
>
&g
: Ziv Leyes
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird error
Can you check for the crashinfo file on bootflash: and also provide:
sh ver
sh stack
Rodney
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:45:21PM +0200, Ziv Leyes wrote:
> SHAMELESS BUMP!!!
>
> Is anybody willing to check this out and
ct: Re: [c-nsp] Weird error
Hi Ziv,
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 14:49 +0200, Ziv Leyes wrote:
> Hey Gert,
> I know what cisco-nsp is, I know it's not an official Cisco TAC, and
> I'm not expecting anybody to act like that, I just find it funny that
> there's nobody that can
t; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ziv Leyes
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 1:08 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird error
>
> Just another detail, now I've switched the router back on whil
Hi Ziv,
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 14:49 +0200, Ziv Leyes wrote:
> Hey Gert,
> I know what cisco-nsp is, I know it's not an official Cisco TAC, and
> I'm not expecting anybody to act like that, I just find it funny that
> there's nobody that can tell something about it... I've been reading
> all the
What IOS version do you use?
One corrected ECC error is ok. If it continue to repeat you need to change DRAM
module
Ziv Leyes wrote:
> I just find it funny that there's nobody that can tell something about it...
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
in the past and never had a single
response to them... Is it because of my name
:(
Ziv
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 1:05 PM
To: Ziv Leyes
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird error
Hi,
On Wed, Fe
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:45:21PM +0200, Ziv Leyes wrote:
> Is anybody willing to check this out and give an answer please???
There seems to be a misunderstanding on what cisco-nsp is...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ziv Leyes
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:00 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Weird error
Hi,
One of our border routers (7200 VXR NPE-G1) went down and when we connected
console and restart it it gave this
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ziv Leyes
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:00 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Weird error
Hi,
One of our border routers (7200 VXR NPE-G1) went down and when we connected
console and restart it it gave this
Hi,
One of our border routers (7200 VXR NPE-G1) went down and when we connected
console and restart it it gave this weird error:
%SYS-1-MTNOTFENCED: Expired timer is not fenced, timer = 0, type 0
*** System received a Software forced crash ***
Signal= 0x17, code= 0x24, context= 0x63059804
PC = 0
follow the whole procedure with a TAC case and
direct guidance from TAC.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael K. Smith
- Adhost
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 11:28 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Weird Error
-feira, 15 de Novembro de 2007 9:28
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Weird Error Message in 'sho ver' on GSR after upgrade
Hello All:
I just upgraded from 12.0(28)S to 12.0(32)S8 on a 12008 and I'm now see
this message in a show version.
WARNING: Non-zero CAN jam reset
rom: Sascha E. Pollok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 1:32 AM
> To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Error Message in 'sho ver' on GSR after
> upgrade
>
> Mike,
>
> hm... I am not
Mike,
hm... I am not too sure but afaik the MBUS is a CAN bus. Could
you do a "show mbus can-error" ? And maybe try a
"clear mbus-statistics" afterwards.
Regards
Sascha
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> I just upgraded from 12.0(28)S to 12.0(32)S8 on a 12008
Hello All:
I just upgraded from 12.0(28)S to 12.0(32)S8 on a 12008 and I'm now see
this message in a show version.
WARNING: Non-zero CAN jam reset counter in slot 18
WARNING: Non-zero CAN jam reset counter in slot 19
WARNING: Non-zero CAN jam reset counter in slot 20
Those are the Switch Fabric
Rodney Dunn wrote:
> Code version?
>
> I see some bugs with this that appear to be fixed in 12.2(33)SXH.
>
> I'm trying to understand if it's card specific.
>
For us it was SRA3 on sup7203bxl
--
Steve Lalonde RTFM
Chief Technical Officer
Entanet International Ltd
http://www.enta.net/
s router
>>
>> What a crapshoot...I will have to reboot the edge router to fix
>> this...thanks bro
>>
>> Raman
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Lalonde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:59 AM
>>
s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF6.bin
Thanks
Raman
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 11:19 AM
To: Raman Sud
Cc: Steve Lalonde; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Error
Code version?
I see some
03, 2007 10:59 AM
> To: Raman Sud
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Error
>
> Raman Sud wrote:
> > Has anyone seen this error on a Cisco 6509 running sup 720-3bxls:
> >
> > HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
> > HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:59 AM
To: Raman Sud
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Weird Error
Raman Sud wrote:
> Has anyone seen this error on a Cisco 6509 running sup 720-3bxls:
>
> HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
> HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Typ
Raman Sud wrote:
> Has anyone seen this error on a Cisco 6509 running sup 720-3bxls:
>
> HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
> HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
> HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
> HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
> HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
> HWIF-QOS-ERR: Inval
Has anyone seen this error on a Cisco 6509 running sup 720-3bxls:
HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type
HWIF-QOS-ERR: Invalid QoS Port Type[OK]
I cant find
26 matches
Mail list logo
