Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-10 Thread Olof Kasselstrand
it, and would update. > > Thanks > Arie > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Olof Kasselstrand > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 13:03 > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-10 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
: Thursday, September 10, 2009 13:03 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness I think there is some serious problems with BVIs and IPv6. // Olof On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Joe Abley wrote: > > On 2009-09-09, at 04:56, Bjørn Mork

Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-10 Thread Olof Kasselstrand
I think there is some serious problems with BVIs and IPv6. // Olof On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Joe Abley wrote: > > On 2009-09-09, at 04:56, Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> Joe Abley writes: >> >>> interface FastEthernet0/1 >>> description facing the exchange point >>> bridge-group 1 >>> bridge-gr

Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-09 Thread Joe Abley
On 2009-09-09, at 04:56, Bjørn Mork wrote: Joe Abley writes: interface FastEthernet0/1 description facing the exchange point bridge-group 1 bridge-group 1 output-pattern-list 1100 And this access list does allow e.g. IPv6 multicast frames? That access list is just cleaning frames being s

Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-09 Thread Joe Abley
On 2009-09-09, at 04:13, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: Did you check for MTU issues? IPv6 has different MTU requirements than IPv4, and the setup you are describing is prone to MTU issues due to the reduced MTU on the L2 transport. That's an interesting idea, but in this case I've tested and t

Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-09 Thread Joe Abley
On 2009-09-08, at 18:47, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: I don't think the bridge is really transparent due to the 'bridge 1 route ip' on your exchange-point side device. If possible, you might want to try removing that statement (if you're local to the device, of course) to see if that does

Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-09 Thread Bjørn Mork
Joe Abley writes: > interface FastEthernet0/1 > description facing the exchange point > bridge-group 1 > bridge-group 1 output-pattern-list 1100 And this access list does allow e.g. IPv6 multicast frames? Bjørn ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-ns

Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-09 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
] On Behalf Of Joe Abley Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 01:37 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness I have the following setup in place for remote access to an exchange point in Toronto: juniper J2320 router

Re: [c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-08 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello Joe: > > Is there something fundamental I'm missing, here? Why should a > transparent bridge behave differently with IPv4 than it does with IPv6? > > > Joe > > ! cisco bridge 1 > > cisco 2620 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x102) with 61440K/4096K bytes > of memory. > System image file

[c-nsp] small cisco as ethernet bridge, IPv6 broken, sadness

2009-09-08 Thread Joe Abley
I have the following setup in place for remote access to an exchange point in Toronto: juniper J2320 router | cisco bridge 1 | | ) telco-provided ---|--- ) layer-2 | ) transport | cisco bridge 2 | e