I believe it works like this:
The firmware updates immediately upon device package install, but isn't
available until TFTP is restarted. The device defaults are updated as well.
Just go into device defaults before you restart (since you do have to do a full
restart for new device models to
So to not look like a complete nut, this may have been sitting in my outbox on
my laptop for several days...
Doh!
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
Hi All,
Give me a few days to check and I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Ryan LaFountain
Unified Contact Center
Cisco Services
Direct: +1 919 392 9898
Hours: M - F 9:00am - 5:00pm Eastern Time
On Jan 7, 2015, at 6:54 AM, Dave Cardwell
Hi All,
Apologies for the miss. We’ve added it to the upcoming qualifications with an
ETA of January 23rd. We’ll qualify it at that time and update the Compatibility
Matrix. It should be pretty straightforward as it is already presumed qualified
with 8.5(1)SU4 (as 9.1(2)SU1 is qualified with
I used 10.5.2 upgrade media to upgrade from 8.6, at that point you need to
do the fresh install and DRS restore routine to correct the unaligned
partition issue.
The issue occurs when you try to install a fresh subscriber after having
done the DRS restore on the Publisher.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at
Thanks Ryan!
Exactly the info I need to beat up sales/presales with.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Ryan LaFountain (rlafount)
rlafo...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Erick,
1. The campaign management APIs were introduced in 10.0 that allow for
management of the dialing list through the REST
That totally makes sense now. Sorry for being dense.
Thanks for sharing the defect too by the way. I have done a few upgrades
from pre 9x to 10x recently and have yet to see an unaligned partition
issue. But I'll keep this one handy nonetheless.
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 10:19:36 PM Erick
Hi Erick,
1. The campaign management APIs were introduced in 10.0 that allow for
management of the dialing list through the REST configuration APIs (page 50 of
https://developer.cisco.com/fileMedia/download/bf325c6f-a1a0-485d-88a1-10b612ff59e7)
But, in 8.5, the upload is still manual.
2.
Not if both DNS are in the same partition. But if you change that, then you
no longer have a shared line.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:13 PM Lisa Notarianni lisa.notaria...@scranton.edu
wrote:
Currently at Call manager version 8.6:
Does anyone know of a way to have an extension ring on one
You would have to place a different DN on Phone A and make the hunt pilot
the old DN number.
Easier method may just be to change the Call Forward No Answer on Phone A's
line to forward to Phone B's DN. Then change the Call Forward No Answer
timer to about 12 seconds for 3 rings.
Brian
On Wed,
One way is if the DNs are in different partitions.
So the hunt group DN is in a partition that most/appropriate people can access.
Phone A's DN is in a different partition that only the hunt group can access.
Phone B's DN is in a third partition that only the hunt group can access.
That way if
I could be mistaken, bu this functionality doesn't exist today.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Pavan Kmailto:pav.c...@gmail.com
Sent: 1/7/2015 1:28 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Blocking Jabber file
For those of you sill out there doing upgrades from pre-9.x to 10.x and
running nto the unaligned partition issue...
There is a bug that was opened on 12/30 regarding the fresh install with
110.5.2.1-5
and installing the subscriber(s) ater the restore to the Publisher.
You get about 99%
I am migrating UCCX version 8.5(SU4) from MCS to a Virtualized platform
(Version 10.5(SU1) and was following these steps outlined here:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Virtualization_for_Cisco_Unified_Contact_Center_Express
I have a couple questions:
1. In the pre-migration step 1 I have
Hi,
Please can any one suggest the reason for the router reload due to software
forced crash PC 0x21BC8BD4.
I tried to find the some significance for the code PC 0x21BC8BD4, but unable to
find it.
Below is the show version after the reload.
Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software
I'd also be really interested in the answer, if anybody has already asked
TAC?
Thanks
Dave
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Anthony Holloway
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah ok. My experience with the UCCX compatibility documents is that it's
generally up to date and if you open a
16 matches
Mail list logo
