I'm assuming no on this question, based on the fact that I haven't heard even
an inkling, and I know they're working on multi-line support for Jabber, but I
was wondering: Has anyone heard anything about them possibly coming up with a
new IP communicator that is based on the 8800 series code? I
All signs point to EOL for CIPC one multi-line and EM are supported on
Jabber. I don't see them making another standalone softphone.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Ben Amick wrote:
> I’m assuming no on this question, based on the fact that I haven’t heard
> even an inkling, and I know they’r
I can see it maybe just because BIB for recording still isn’t supported as far
as I recall. That and some organizations just don’t want to deal with the
compliance issues of an IM platform. But I do agree with you on both points.
Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst
From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead.
My understanding is that the answer is "No," to updated IP communicator. I am
also not sure of the true commitment to multi-line Jabber support. I have yet
to see any dates around multi-line Jabber at this point, which my experience
with Cisco say's don't count on it or expect it.
Dennis Heim
There have been a few updates to CIPC in the last couple of years, but I
haven't read the release notes as to what, so someone has been spending a
bit of time on the code.
I've seen a lot of contact centers use CIPC, I don't see it going away soon.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Heim, Dennis
I’ll raise my hand as one of those contact centers. Right now it’s because of
the two reasons I mentioned in a parallel chain: a need for multiple lines and
the BIB for QM recording. The former is on the roadmap for jabber (with no
ETA), but the latter as far as I’m aware still isn’t a part of J
We use SCCP SecureVPN phones now for remote access for SOHO users. We would
like to use newer SIP phones, but so far, I haven’t seen a solution for the
88xx phones. We also need multiple lines, shared lines, hunt groups, etc… As
far as I know ExpressWay is only for Jabber clients, does anyone kn
I'm fairly certain both the 7800 and 8800 phones support Cisco VPN, and I think
they also support expressway over MRA. Could be wrong, but I vaguely recall
that.
Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst
On Feb 28, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Matthew Huff mailto:mh...@ox.com>>
wrote:
We use SCCP SecureVPN phones now f
At least desktop jabber supports BIB for recording:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/11_5/CJAB_BK_C9858CC7_00_cisco-jabber-features-guide/CJAB_BK_C9858CC7_00_cisco-jabber-features-guide_chapter_0110.html
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Ben Amick wrote:
> I’ll raise my h
88XX phones work with MRA with shared lines and multiple lines now.
Limitation is BiB doesn't work over MRA yet that I'm aware of.
Jabber BiB does work for call recording, just not in an MRA scenario.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> We use SCCP SecureVPN phones now for re
Yes, they do support SSL VPN and MRA although MRA has a smaller featureset.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Ben Amick wrote:
> I'm fairly certain both the 7800 and 8800 phones support Cisco VPN, and I
> think they also support expressway over MRA. Could be wrong, but I vaguely
> recall that.
>
Hi Matthew,
The 88XX phones do work with expressway I believe. Here's a link to show how to
configure it:
https://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2015/05/26/collab-edge-mra-for-78008800dx-series-endpoints/___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.
Okay, so, I’ve been until recently a CME admin, now I’m doing CUCM, so…. What’s
MRA?
Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd
Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577
OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff| Fax: 914-694-5669
From: bmead...@gmai
MRA is Mobile and Remote Access – a fancy word for a procedure that enables
Jabber and other specific phones to be used remotely without a VPN by tunneling
through the Expressway product, requiring separate licensing.
Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst
From: Matthew Huff [mailto:mh...@ox.com]
Sent: Tues
MRA is free now so just need to request the Expressway licensing through
PUT.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Ben Amick wrote:
> MRA is Mobile and Remote Access – a fancy word for a procedure that
> enables Jabber and other specific phones to be used remotely without a VPN
> by tunneling throug
Oh, cool. I never saw that change announced. So they did away with licensing
for MRA and CMR, so RMS licensing is essentially just for B2B video calls again?
Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst
On Feb 28, 2017, at 2:18 PM, Brian Meade
mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote:
MRA is free now so just need to reque
Yea, CMR is included with WebEx if you do annual subscription I believe.
Also they changed licensing in Expressway so that CMR calls do not use RMS
licensing. So now you only need RMS licensing for B2B calls. SMP and PMP
licensing are now coming with RMS licensing so not many people will be
order
Mobile Remote Access.
At a 10,000 foot view; a way to register Cisco Jabber clients and Cisco IP
8800/7800 to Communications Manager without VPN (replaces phone proxy and phone
vpn).
It involves Cisco Expressway (VCS) servers that are configured like a standard
reverse internet proxy (called a
Arguably, one of the coolest licensing things Cisco has done in awhile ;).
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Brian Meade
mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote:
MRA is free now so just need to request the Expressway licensing through PUT.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Ben Amick
mail
The caveat to the free license, even in version 8.9 I believe, is that if you
do any sort of transform on the expressway (such as using a abbreviated dial
pattern in call manager and then transforming it into the appropriate WebEx
suffix domain in expressway C) does consume a RMS license.
Thank
Yea, have to stick to the exact search rule they give you for it to not
consume RMS licensing.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> The caveat to the free license, even in version 8.9 I believe, is that if
> you do any sort of transform on the expressway (such as using a abbreviat
That said, I have found a way around that even by using a Lua script on the CCM
trunk; essentially fixing up the called URI before getting to expressway C.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Brian Meade
mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote:
Yea, have to stick to the exact search rule t
22 matches
Mail list logo
